Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Koproski, Leticia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Paetzhold, Eder, Goldammer, Johann
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biodiversidade Brasileira
Texto Completo: https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169
Resumo: Brazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success.
id ICMBIO-1_d1189f9ac63208bbe899c4e2d7069218
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1169
network_acronym_str ICMBIO-1
network_name_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository_id_str
spelling Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected AreasBrazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success.Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)2019-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/116910.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 382236-288610.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileirainstname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)instacron:ICMBIOporhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169/676Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasilhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoproski, LeticiaPaetzhold, EderGoldammer, Johann2023-05-09T12:56:02Zoai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1169Revistahttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBRPUBhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/oaifernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br2236-28862236-2886opendoar:2023-05-09T12:56:02Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
title Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
spellingShingle Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
Koproski, Leticia
title_short Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
title_full Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
title_fullStr Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
title_full_unstemmed Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
title_sort Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
author Koproski, Leticia
author_facet Koproski, Leticia
Paetzhold, Eder
Goldammer, Johann
author_role author
author2 Paetzhold, Eder
Goldammer, Johann
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Koproski, Leticia
Paetzhold, Eder
Goldammer, Johann
description Brazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169
url https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169
identifier_str_mv 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169/676
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38
2236-2886
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1
reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileira
instname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron:ICMBIO
instname_str Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
instacron_str ICMBIO
institution ICMBIO
reponame_str Biodiversidade Brasileira
collection Biodiversidade Brasileira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br
_version_ 1797042391824203776