Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biodiversidade Brasileira |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169 |
Resumo: | Brazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success. |
id |
ICMBIO-1_d1189f9ac63208bbe899c4e2d7069218 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1169 |
network_acronym_str |
ICMBIO-1 |
network_name_str |
Biodiversidade Brasileira |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected AreasBrazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success.Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)2019-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/116910.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 382236-288610.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileirainstname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)instacron:ICMBIOporhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169/676Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasilhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoproski, LeticiaPaetzhold, EderGoldammer, Johann2023-05-09T12:56:02Zoai:revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br:article/1169Revistahttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBRPUBhttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/oaifernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br2236-28862236-2886opendoar:2023-05-09T12:56:02Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
title |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
spellingShingle |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas Koproski, Leticia |
title_short |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
title_full |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
title_fullStr |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
title_sort |
Media Coverage of Wildlife Affected by Wildfires in Brazilian Protected Areas |
author |
Koproski, Leticia |
author_facet |
Koproski, Leticia Paetzhold, Eder Goldammer, Johann |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paetzhold, Eder Goldammer, Johann |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Koproski, Leticia Paetzhold, Eder Goldammer, Johann |
description |
Brazil is host of almost 120,000 animal species and therefore classified as “megadiverse”. Although fire is a natural agent in some Brazilian ecosystems and fauna historically evolved with its presence, nowadays it can be a potential hazard to fauna conservation as wildfire trends worsen, wildlife populations facing extinction and non-disturbed natural areas are becoming smaller and isolated. Wildlife affected by fires urge emotions, and are used by media to capture public attention. Media coverage may influence people’s perception about fire effects on fauna. This study analyses news available online of five wildfires that occurred from 2014-2018 in protected areas and are representative for fauna species conservation: Poço das Antas Biological Reserve (2014), and the National Parlks Chapada Diamantina (2015), Jaú (2016), Chapada dos Veadeiros (2017), and Serra da Canastra (2018). The majority of news reported protected areas’ location and burned extension, but only half indicated their importance for fauna or flora biological conservation. Half of the reports addressed fauna affected by wildfires, 40% presented dead animals, 12% burned animals and 8% trapped ones. Only 24% mentioned wildlife rescue. Despite Brazilian fauna species amount, wildlife’ images were presented in 35% of the communications, and they were focused on dead animals. Wildlife affected by fire cited were Leontopithecus rosalia, Bradypus torquatus, Nasua nasua, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Dasyprocta azarae, Peltochephalus dumerilianus, besides alligators, snakes, birds and insects that were not specifically identified. Scientifically-based fire ecology aspects were not disclosed in any of the news. Overall there is a lack of information for society. This arouses challenges and opportunities of communication about fire ecology and its effects on wildlife in Brazilian protected areas. There is an urgent need for building public awareness on conservation in Brazil. Wildfires can be used to build environmental perception, and media, scientifically supported, address a crucial role for communications’ success. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169 |
url |
https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1.1169 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/BioBR/article/view/1169/676 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversidade Brasileira ; v. 9 n. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38 Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38 Biodiversidade Brasileira ; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2019): Wildfire Conference: Resumos; 38 2236-2886 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v9i1 reponame:Biodiversidade Brasileira instname:Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO) instacron:ICMBIO |
instname_str |
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO) |
instacron_str |
ICMBIO |
institution |
ICMBIO |
reponame_str |
Biodiversidade Brasileira |
collection |
Biodiversidade Brasileira |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversidade Brasileira - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fernanda.oliveto@icmbio.gov.br || katia.ribeiro@icmbio.gov.br |
_version_ |
1797042391824203776 |