Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista IDEAS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249 |
Resumo: | The objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary. |
id |
IDEAS_1d75cdb83ce58104b4d22a8988bbfbb6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/249 |
network_acronym_str |
IDEAS |
network_name_str |
Revista IDEAS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farmingAnálise econômica comparativa de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados pela agricultura familiarAgricultural productionCostsCommercializationShort channelsProfitabilityProdução de frutasCustosComercializaçãoCanais de comercializaçãoLucratividadeThe objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary.O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar comparativamente a economicidade de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados no escoamento da produção de melancias de uma propriedade rural familiar. O local de pesquisa é uma propriedade localizada no município de Palmeira das Missões, noroeste do Rio Grande do Sul – BR. O método utilizado foi o estudo de caso, que consiste na apuração de custos da atividade produtiva, referente ao ano agrícola de 2018/2019. O canal mais lucrativo é o face a face (comercialização na propriedade), com a margem de contribuição unitária de 84%. A menor margem de contribuição unitária foi identificada no canal em que a melancia foi comercializada por meio de intermediários (63%). Entretanto, a inserção no mercado, por diferentes canais, consiste em uma estratégia para diminuição de riscos mercadológicos nas produções de alimentos perecíveis, e deve ser vista como complementares.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2020-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004Revista IDeAS; v. 14 n. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e0200041984-98341982-257Xreponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJporhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/311https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/310Copyright (c) 2020 Simone Bueno Camara, Tanice Andreatta, Jenaine de Azevedo, Luciana Fagundes Christofari, Marcos Antonio Bauer Casarinhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno Camara, SimoneAndreatta, Tanicede Azevedo, JenaineFagundes Christofari, Luciana Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio2020-12-31T17:42:47Zoai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/249Revistahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideasPUBhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/oairevistaideas@gmail.com||1984-98341982-257Xopendoar:2020-12-31T17:42:47Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming Análise econômica comparativa de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados pela agricultura familiar |
title |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
spellingShingle |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming Bueno Camara, Simone Agricultural production Costs Commercialization Short channels Profitability Produção de frutas Custos Comercialização Canais de comercialização Lucratividade |
title_short |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
title_full |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
title_fullStr |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
title_sort |
Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming |
author |
Bueno Camara, Simone |
author_facet |
Bueno Camara, Simone Andreatta, Tanice de Azevedo, Jenaine Fagundes Christofari, Luciana Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andreatta, Tanice de Azevedo, Jenaine Fagundes Christofari, Luciana Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bueno Camara, Simone Andreatta, Tanice de Azevedo, Jenaine Fagundes Christofari, Luciana Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agricultural production Costs Commercialization Short channels Profitability Produção de frutas Custos Comercialização Canais de comercialização Lucratividade |
topic |
Agricultural production Costs Commercialization Short channels Profitability Produção de frutas Custos Comercialização Canais de comercialização Lucratividade |
description |
The objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Revisado por pares Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249 |
url |
https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/311 https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/310 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004 Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004 Revista IDeAS; v. 14 n. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004 1984-9834 1982-257X reponame:Revista IDEAS (Online) instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) instacron:UFRRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRRJ |
institution |
UFRRJ |
reponame_str |
Revista IDEAS (Online) |
collection |
Revista IDEAS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaideas@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797231563864276992 |