Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bueno Camara, Simone
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Andreatta, Tanice, de Azevedo, Jenaine, Fagundes Christofari, Luciana, Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista IDEAS (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249
Resumo: The objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary.
id IDEAS_1d75cdb83ce58104b4d22a8988bbfbb6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/249
network_acronym_str IDEAS
network_name_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farmingAnálise econômica comparativa de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados pela agricultura familiarAgricultural productionCostsCommercializationShort channelsProfitabilityProdução de frutasCustosComercializaçãoCanais de comercializaçãoLucratividadeThe objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary.O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar comparativamente a economicidade de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados no escoamento da produção de melancias de uma propriedade rural familiar. O local de pesquisa é uma propriedade localizada no município de Palmeira das Missões, noroeste do Rio Grande do Sul – BR. O método utilizado foi o estudo de caso, que consiste na apuração de custos da atividade produtiva, referente ao ano agrícola de 2018/2019. O canal mais lucrativo é o face a face (comercialização na propriedade), com a margem de contribuição unitária de 84%. A menor margem de contribuição unitária foi identificada no canal em que a melancia foi comercializada por meio de intermediários (63%). Entretanto, a inserção no mercado, por diferentes canais, consiste em uma estratégia para diminuição de riscos mercadológicos nas produções de alimentos perecíveis, e deve ser vista como complementares.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2020-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004Revista IDeAS; v. 14 n. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e0200041984-98341982-257Xreponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJporhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/311https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/310Copyright (c) 2020 Simone Bueno Camara, Tanice Andreatta, Jenaine de Azevedo, Luciana Fagundes Christofari, Marcos Antonio Bauer Casarinhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno Camara, SimoneAndreatta, Tanicede Azevedo, JenaineFagundes Christofari, Luciana Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio2020-12-31T17:42:47Zoai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/249Revistahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideasPUBhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/oairevistaideas@gmail.com||1984-98341982-257Xopendoar:2020-12-31T17:42:47Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
Análise econômica comparativa de diferentes canais de comercialização utilizados pela agricultura familiar
title Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
spellingShingle Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
Bueno Camara, Simone
Agricultural production
Costs
Commercialization
Short channels
Profitability
Produção de frutas
Custos
Comercialização
Canais de comercialização
Lucratividade
title_short Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
title_full Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
title_fullStr Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
title_full_unstemmed Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
title_sort Comparative economic analysis of different marketing channels used by family farming
author Bueno Camara, Simone
author_facet Bueno Camara, Simone
Andreatta, Tanice
de Azevedo, Jenaine
Fagundes Christofari, Luciana
Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio
author_role author
author2 Andreatta, Tanice
de Azevedo, Jenaine
Fagundes Christofari, Luciana
Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bueno Camara, Simone
Andreatta, Tanice
de Azevedo, Jenaine
Fagundes Christofari, Luciana
Bauer Casarin, Marcos Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural production
Costs
Commercialization
Short channels
Profitability
Produção de frutas
Custos
Comercialização
Canais de comercialização
Lucratividade
topic Agricultural production
Costs
Commercialization
Short channels
Profitability
Produção de frutas
Custos
Comercialização
Canais de comercialização
Lucratividade
description The objective in this article is to comparatively assess the economics of different marketing channels used in the outflow of watermelon production from a family farm. The research site is a property located in the municipality of Palmeira das Missões, northwest of Rio Grande do Sul-BR. The method used was the case study, which consists of calculating the costs of the productive activity for the 2018/2019 agricultural year. The most profitable channel is face-to-face (commercialization on property), with a unit contribution margin of 84%. The lowest unit contribution margin was identified in the channel where watermelon was marketed through intermediaries (63%). However, insertion in the market, through different channels, is a strategy to reduce market risks in the production of perishable food and should be seen as complementary.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249
url https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/311
https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/249/310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004
Revista IDeAS; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004
Revista IDeAS; v. 14 n. 1 (2020): jan./dez. 2020 – Publicação contínua ; e020004
1984-9834
1982-257X
reponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
collection Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaideas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797231563864276992