Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kostlin, Laura
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Luiz Da Silva, Tamajara Janaina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista IDEAS (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74
Resumo: his paper we present an analysis evidencing contrasts and similarities between the theoretical and methodological approaches of the authors Alexander Chayanov, Huges Lamarche and Jan Van der Ploeg Douve, whose main concerns lie in understanding the problems relating to the peasantry, as object study, in various historical, cultural, social and economic developments in Latin America and the world. For purposes of contrast their perspectives of study, proceed first to present how each of the authors came to the development and structuring of the concepts that give specificity to the peasantry and how they were operationalized methodologically, and secondly, we will present what attributes listed and organized by each of the authors to structure and definition of the specificity of the peasantry as a concept, can be operationalized so universalizing the purpose of explaining and understanding empirical cases.
id IDEAS_4c595b9da41ec754f849dda3cba6dd37
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/74
network_acronym_str IDEAS
network_name_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.peasantrycomparative analysistheoretical and methodological approachesenfoques teórico-metodológicosanálise comparativacampesinatocampesinadoanálisis comparativoenfoques teórico-metodológicoshis paper we present an analysis evidencing contrasts and similarities between the theoretical and methodological approaches of the authors Alexander Chayanov, Huges Lamarche and Jan Van der Ploeg Douve, whose main concerns lie in understanding the problems relating to the peasantry, as object study, in various historical, cultural, social and economic developments in Latin America and the world. For purposes of contrast their perspectives of study, proceed first to present how each of the authors came to the development and structuring of the concepts that give specificity to the peasantry and how they were operationalized methodologically, and secondly, we will present what attributes listed and organized by each of the authors to structure and definition of the specificity of the peasantry as a concept, can be operationalized so universalizing the purpose of explaining and understanding empirical cases.En este trabajo proponemos presentar un análisis que evidencie contrastes y semejanzas entre los enfoques teórico-metodológicos de los autores Alexander Chayanov, Huges Lamarche y Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, cuyas preocupaciones centrales residen en la comprensión de la problemática referida al campesinado, en tanto objeto de estudio, en diversos contextos históricos, culturales, sociales y económicos en América Latina y el mundo. A los fines de contrastar sus perspectivas de estudio, procederemos en primer lugar a presentar cómo cada uno de los autores llegó a la elaboración y estructuración de los conceptos que dan especificidad al campesinado y cómo fueron operacionalizados metodológicamente; y en segundo lugar, presentaremos cuáles son los atributos enumerados y organizados por cada uno de los autores para la estructuración y delimitación de la especificidad del campesinado en tanto concepto, posible de ser operacionalizado de modo universalizante con la finalidad de explicar y comprender casos empíricos.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2015-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74Revista IDeAS; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-192Revista IDeAS; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-192Revista IDeAS; v. 6 n. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-1921984-98341982-257Xreponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJspahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74/74Copyright (c) 2012 Laura Kostlin, Tamajara Janaina Luiz Da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKostlin, LauraLuiz Da Silva, Tamajara Janaina2020-06-01T11:59:45Zoai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/74Revistahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideasPUBhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/oairevistaideas@gmail.com||1984-98341982-257Xopendoar:2020-06-01T11:59:45Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
title Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
spellingShingle Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
Kostlin, Laura
peasantry
comparative analysis
theoretical and methodological approaches
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
análise comparativa
campesinato
campesinado
análisis comparativo
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
title_short Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
title_full Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
title_fullStr Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
title_full_unstemmed Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
title_sort Entre similitudes y contrastes. Modos y estrategias de abordaje del campesinado en las perspectivas de Jan Douve Van der Ploeg, Alexander Chayanov y Huges Lamarche.
author Kostlin, Laura
author_facet Kostlin, Laura
Luiz Da Silva, Tamajara Janaina
author_role author
author2 Luiz Da Silva, Tamajara Janaina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kostlin, Laura
Luiz Da Silva, Tamajara Janaina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv peasantry
comparative analysis
theoretical and methodological approaches
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
análise comparativa
campesinato
campesinado
análisis comparativo
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
topic peasantry
comparative analysis
theoretical and methodological approaches
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
análise comparativa
campesinato
campesinado
análisis comparativo
enfoques teórico-metodológicos
description his paper we present an analysis evidencing contrasts and similarities between the theoretical and methodological approaches of the authors Alexander Chayanov, Huges Lamarche and Jan Van der Ploeg Douve, whose main concerns lie in understanding the problems relating to the peasantry, as object study, in various historical, cultural, social and economic developments in Latin America and the world. For purposes of contrast their perspectives of study, proceed first to present how each of the authors came to the development and structuring of the concepts that give specificity to the peasantry and how they were operationalized methodologically, and secondly, we will present what attributes listed and organized by each of the authors to structure and definition of the specificity of the peasantry as a concept, can be operationalized so universalizing the purpose of explaining and understanding empirical cases.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74
url https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/74/74
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Laura Kostlin, Tamajara Janaina Luiz Da Silva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Laura Kostlin, Tamajara Janaina Luiz Da Silva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IDeAS; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-192
Revista IDeAS; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-192
Revista IDeAS; v. 6 n. 2 (2012): julho a dezembro de 2012; 170-192
1984-9834
1982-257X
reponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
collection Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaideas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797231563164876800

Registros relacionados