Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Brito, Maria Natália
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Diniz Guerra, Gutemberg Armando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista IDEAS (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150
Resumo: This article analyzes contradictions in the agrarian reform process in the State of Para [Brazil] from the scenario established due to the law enforcements in the rural settlements created in the Transamazonica Highway and Xingu Regions by the National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform [INCRA]. Data has been gathered from field research in two settlements located in the municipality of Pacaja — in the Brazilian state of Para — named Anapuzinho and Cupuzal, which were restrained by the Federal Justice in 2007, complying with a request of the District Attorney's Office, showing a distortion in government actions to create rural settlement projects for Agrarian Reform. Misconceptions in bureaucratic procedures made by the Incra have derailed the access of peasants to the government programs. Peasants have illegally settled in the area mostly because of government omission and inability to formalize such arable lands to contribute to the country and the region's productive chai.
id IDEAS_c04dfe81c0dbe54d30e5d95ab4370d3b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/150
network_acronym_str IDEAS
network_name_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regionsPosseiro ou assentado? Reflexos do processo de interdição de assentamentos no território da transamazônica e Xingu agrarian reformcolonizationpeasantryIncra (Brazil)CampesinatoColonizaçãoReforma agráriaIncraThis article analyzes contradictions in the agrarian reform process in the State of Para [Brazil] from the scenario established due to the law enforcements in the rural settlements created in the Transamazonica Highway and Xingu Regions by the National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform [INCRA]. Data has been gathered from field research in two settlements located in the municipality of Pacaja — in the Brazilian state of Para — named Anapuzinho and Cupuzal, which were restrained by the Federal Justice in 2007, complying with a request of the District Attorney's Office, showing a distortion in government actions to create rural settlement projects for Agrarian Reform. Misconceptions in bureaucratic procedures made by the Incra have derailed the access of peasants to the government programs. Peasants have illegally settled in the area mostly because of government omission and inability to formalize such arable lands to contribute to the country and the region's productive chai.Este artigo analisa contradições na implementação da Reforma Agrária no Estado do Pará a partir da conjuntura que se instaurou devido ao processo de interdição judicial de assentamentos rurais criados no Território da Transamazônica e Xingu pela agência fundiária governamental - o Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária (INCRA). A partir dos resultados da pesquisa de campo realizada em dois assentamentos rurais localizados no município de Pacajá – Pará, o assentamento Anapuzinho e o Assentamento Cupuzal que foram interditados pela Justiça Federal no ano de 2007 a pedido do Ministério Público Federal, demonstra-se uma distorção das ações governamentais para a criação de projetos de assentamentos rurais de reforma agrária. Equívocos nos procedimentos burocráticos realizados pelo INCRA inviabilizam o acesso de camponeses aos benefícios do programa oficial. Os camponeses se mantêm na área a despeito da omissão estatal na formalização da incorporação destas terras ao processo produtivo do país e da região.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2017-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150Revista IDeAS; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-226Revista IDeAS; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-226Revista IDeAS; v. 9 n. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-2261984-98341982-257Xreponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJporhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150/149Copyright (c) 2017 Maria Natália Silva Brito, Gutemberg Armando Diniz Guerrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Brito, Maria NatáliaDiniz Guerra, Gutemberg Armando2020-05-21T14:35:01Zoai:ojs.revistaideas.ufrrj.br:article/150Revistahttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideasPUBhttps://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/oairevistaideas@gmail.com||1984-98341982-257Xopendoar:2020-05-21T14:35:01Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
Posseiro ou assentado? Reflexos do processo de interdição de assentamentos no território da transamazônica e Xingu
title Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
spellingShingle Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
Silva Brito, Maria Natália
agrarian reform
colonization
peasantry
Incra (Brazil)
Campesinato
Colonização
Reforma agrária
Incra
title_short Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
title_full Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
title_fullStr Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
title_full_unstemmed Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
title_sort Squatters or settlers? The aftermath over the settlement enforcements in the transamazonica highway and Xingu regions
author Silva Brito, Maria Natália
author_facet Silva Brito, Maria Natália
Diniz Guerra, Gutemberg Armando
author_role author
author2 Diniz Guerra, Gutemberg Armando
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Brito, Maria Natália
Diniz Guerra, Gutemberg Armando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agrarian reform
colonization
peasantry
Incra (Brazil)
Campesinato
Colonização
Reforma agrária
Incra
topic agrarian reform
colonization
peasantry
Incra (Brazil)
Campesinato
Colonização
Reforma agrária
Incra
description This article analyzes contradictions in the agrarian reform process in the State of Para [Brazil] from the scenario established due to the law enforcements in the rural settlements created in the Transamazonica Highway and Xingu Regions by the National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform [INCRA]. Data has been gathered from field research in two settlements located in the municipality of Pacaja — in the Brazilian state of Para — named Anapuzinho and Cupuzal, which were restrained by the Federal Justice in 2007, complying with a request of the District Attorney's Office, showing a distortion in government actions to create rural settlement projects for Agrarian Reform. Misconceptions in bureaucratic procedures made by the Incra have derailed the access of peasants to the government programs. Peasants have illegally settled in the area mostly because of government omission and inability to formalize such arable lands to contribute to the country and the region's productive chai.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150
url https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaideas.ufrrj.br/ojs/index.php/ideas/article/view/150/149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Maria Natália Silva Brito, Gutemberg Armando Diniz Guerra
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Maria Natália Silva Brito, Gutemberg Armando Diniz Guerra
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IDeAS; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-226
Revista IDeAS; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-226
Revista IDeAS; v. 9 n. 1 (2015): janeiro a junho de 2015; 189-226
1984-9834
1982-257X
reponame:Revista IDEAS (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Revista IDEAS (Online)
collection Revista IDEAS (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IDEAS (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaideas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797231563596890112

Registros relacionados