MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bimbato Vieira, Victória
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade
Texto Completo: https://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/432
Resumo: Representing a milestone in the evolution of Brazilian Law, the Federal Constitution of 1988 – known as the Citizen Constitution – assured the Public Prosecutor's Office the constitutional status of fiscal of the legal order, aimed at defending homogeneous individual, collective and diffuse rights. With the enactment of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, we had a new phase in the evolution of national law with the progress of the system of binding precedents in our legal system. The new normative diploma, following the Brazilian Magna Carta, brought a more present role of the Public Ministry in Procedural Law, including in the system of precedents. Within this system, one of the biggest innovations is the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident, which aims to ensure isonomy and legal security in Brazilian legal processes. Thus, the question arises, why the legislator of the new Code of Civil Procedure guaranteed the mandatory action of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident?
id IEPP-3_166547b6c292b6d56c921e16b654dff5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/432
network_acronym_str IEPP-3
network_name_str Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade
repository_id_str
spelling MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDSATUAÇÃO OBRIGATÓRIA DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO NO INCIDENTE DE RESOLUÇÃO DE DEMANDAS REPETITIVASCódigo de Processo Civil. Sistema de precedentes. Ministério Público. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas.Code of Civil Procedure. System of precedents. Public ministry. Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident.Representing a milestone in the evolution of Brazilian Law, the Federal Constitution of 1988 – known as the Citizen Constitution – assured the Public Prosecutor's Office the constitutional status of fiscal of the legal order, aimed at defending homogeneous individual, collective and diffuse rights. With the enactment of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, we had a new phase in the evolution of national law with the progress of the system of binding precedents in our legal system. The new normative diploma, following the Brazilian Magna Carta, brought a more present role of the Public Ministry in Procedural Law, including in the system of precedents. Within this system, one of the biggest innovations is the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident, which aims to ensure isonomy and legal security in Brazilian legal processes. Thus, the question arises, why the legislator of the new Code of Civil Procedure guaranteed the mandatory action of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident?Representando um marco na evolução do Direito brasileiro, a Constituição Federal de 1988 – denominada como Constituição Cidadã – assegurou ao Ministério Público o status constitucional de fiscal da ordem jurídica, voltado para defesa dos direitos difusos, coletivos e individuais homogêneos. Com a vigência do Código de Processo Civil de 2015 tivemos uma nova fase na evolução do direito pátrio com o progresso do sistema de precedentes vinculantes em nosso ordenamento jurídico. O novo diploma normativo, seguindo a Carta Magna brasileira, trouxe uma atuação mais presente do Ministério Público no Direito Processual, inclusive no sistema de precedentes. Dentro desse sistema, uma das maiores novidades é o Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas que visa garantir a isonomia e segurança jurídica nos processos jurídicos brasileiros. Dessa forma surge o questionamento, porque o legislador do novo Código de Processo Civil garantiu a atuação obrigatória do Ministério Público no Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas?Rua Josias Lopes Braga, nº 437, Bancários, João Pessoa - PB2021-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/43210.51249/gei02.03.2021.432Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade; Vol. 2 No. 03 (2021)Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade; v. 2 n. 03 (2021)2675-745110.51249/gei.v2i03reponame:Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridadeinstname:Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Periodicojsinstacron:IEPPporhttps://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/432/305Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Gender and Interdisciplinarityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBimbato Vieira, Victória 2022-02-20T18:27:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/432Revistahttps://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/indexPRIhttps://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/oaigenerointerdisciplinaridade@gmail.com2675-74512675-7451opendoar:2022-02-20T18:27:44Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade - Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Periodicojsfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
ATUAÇÃO OBRIGATÓRIA DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO NO INCIDENTE DE RESOLUÇÃO DE DEMANDAS REPETITIVAS
title MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
spellingShingle MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
Bimbato Vieira, Victória
Código de Processo Civil. Sistema de precedentes. Ministério Público. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas.
Code of Civil Procedure. System of precedents. Public ministry. Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident.
title_short MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
title_full MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
title_fullStr MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
title_full_unstemmed MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
title_sort MANDATORY PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE IN THE INCIDENT OF RESOLVING REPETITIVE DEMANDS
author Bimbato Vieira, Victória
author_facet Bimbato Vieira, Victória
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bimbato Vieira, Victória
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Código de Processo Civil. Sistema de precedentes. Ministério Público. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas.
Code of Civil Procedure. System of precedents. Public ministry. Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident.
topic Código de Processo Civil. Sistema de precedentes. Ministério Público. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas.
Code of Civil Procedure. System of precedents. Public ministry. Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident.
description Representing a milestone in the evolution of Brazilian Law, the Federal Constitution of 1988 – known as the Citizen Constitution – assured the Public Prosecutor's Office the constitutional status of fiscal of the legal order, aimed at defending homogeneous individual, collective and diffuse rights. With the enactment of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, we had a new phase in the evolution of national law with the progress of the system of binding precedents in our legal system. The new normative diploma, following the Brazilian Magna Carta, brought a more present role of the Public Ministry in Procedural Law, including in the system of precedents. Within this system, one of the biggest innovations is the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident, which aims to ensure isonomy and legal security in Brazilian legal processes. Thus, the question arises, why the legislator of the new Code of Civil Procedure guaranteed the mandatory action of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the Repetitive Claims Resolution Incident?
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/432
10.51249/gei02.03.2021.432
url https://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/432
identifier_str_mv 10.51249/gei02.03.2021.432
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/432/305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Gender and Interdisciplinarity
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Gender and Interdisciplinarity
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rua Josias Lopes Braga, nº 437, Bancários, João Pessoa - PB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rua Josias Lopes Braga, nº 437, Bancários, João Pessoa - PB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade; Vol. 2 No. 03 (2021)
Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade; v. 2 n. 03 (2021)
2675-7451
10.51249/gei.v2i03
reponame:Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade
instname:Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Periodicojs
instacron:IEPP
instname_str Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Periodicojs
instacron_str IEPP
institution IEPP
reponame_str Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade
collection Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade - Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Periodicojs
repository.mail.fl_str_mv generointerdisciplinaridade@gmail.com
_version_ 1797047937774125056

Registros relacionados