Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Multi-Science Journal |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1112 |
Resumo: | This paper aims at evaluating the use of BLASSO and BayesCπ methods for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits, studying factors that influence the performance of the models, and if there is a difference in the ranking of individuals. Genotypic and phenotypic information from a simulated population of 4,100 animals, genotyped by 10k markers (QTL-MAS Workshop) were used. 3,000 animals were used for estimation of the predictive ability and bias accessed through 5-fold cross-validation with five repetitions. The other animals were used as a population of selection. One ANOVA and the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welch test were performed to verify, respectively, which factors influence significantly the genomic prediction and if there is a statistical difference between the models. The results show that the four main factors significantly (p < 0.05) affect the predictive ability of GEBVs (genomic estimated breeding values), and that heritability and the number of categories are the most influential factors. Only for ordinal trait 2, with a density of 9k, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the predictive ability of the methods. In general, the BayesCπ method proved to be more efficient in the identification of relevant SNPs and in the ranking of individuals. Finally, there is a slight superiority of the BayesCπ method for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits. |
id |
IFGO-1_457a61f33ab85efa6df5cfa6e274041d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1112 |
network_acronym_str |
IFGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Multi-Science Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated datagenomic selectionbayesian methodsANOVArankingmolecular markersThis paper aims at evaluating the use of BLASSO and BayesCπ methods for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits, studying factors that influence the performance of the models, and if there is a difference in the ranking of individuals. Genotypic and phenotypic information from a simulated population of 4,100 animals, genotyped by 10k markers (QTL-MAS Workshop) were used. 3,000 animals were used for estimation of the predictive ability and bias accessed through 5-fold cross-validation with five repetitions. The other animals were used as a population of selection. One ANOVA and the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welch test were performed to verify, respectively, which factors influence significantly the genomic prediction and if there is a statistical difference between the models. The results show that the four main factors significantly (p < 0.05) affect the predictive ability of GEBVs (genomic estimated breeding values), and that heritability and the number of categories are the most influential factors. Only for ordinal trait 2, with a density of 9k, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the predictive ability of the methods. In general, the BayesCπ method proved to be more efficient in the identification of relevant SNPs and in the ranking of individuals. Finally, there is a slight superiority of the BayesCπ method for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits.Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí2020-03-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/111210.33837/msj.v3i1.1112Multi-Science Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020); 1-7Multi-Science Journal; v. 3 n. 1 (2020); 1-72359-69022359-6902reponame:Multi-Science Journalinstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano)instacron:IFGOenghttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1112/828Copyright (c) 2020 The authorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Geraldo Magela da CruzRibeiro, Andrew de PaulaMartins Filho, Sebastião2020-09-01T11:45:56Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1112Revistahttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/index.php/multisciencePUBhttps://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/index.php/multiscience/oaiguilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com || multiscience@ifgoiano.edu.br || wesley.andrade@ifgoiano.edu.br2359-69022359-6902opendoar:2020-09-01T11:45:56Multi-Science Journal - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
title |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
spellingShingle |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data Pereira, Geraldo Magela da Cruz genomic selection bayesian methods ANOVA ranking molecular markers |
title_short |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
title_full |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
title_fullStr |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
title_sort |
Genomic prediction of ordinal traits via application of the BLASSO and BayesCπ methods in simulated data |
author |
Pereira, Geraldo Magela da Cruz |
author_facet |
Pereira, Geraldo Magela da Cruz Ribeiro, Andrew de Paula Martins Filho, Sebastião |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Andrew de Paula Martins Filho, Sebastião |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Geraldo Magela da Cruz Ribeiro, Andrew de Paula Martins Filho, Sebastião |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
genomic selection bayesian methods ANOVA ranking molecular markers |
topic |
genomic selection bayesian methods ANOVA ranking molecular markers |
description |
This paper aims at evaluating the use of BLASSO and BayesCπ methods for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits, studying factors that influence the performance of the models, and if there is a difference in the ranking of individuals. Genotypic and phenotypic information from a simulated population of 4,100 animals, genotyped by 10k markers (QTL-MAS Workshop) were used. 3,000 animals were used for estimation of the predictive ability and bias accessed through 5-fold cross-validation with five repetitions. The other animals were used as a population of selection. One ANOVA and the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welch test were performed to verify, respectively, which factors influence significantly the genomic prediction and if there is a statistical difference between the models. The results show that the four main factors significantly (p < 0.05) affect the predictive ability of GEBVs (genomic estimated breeding values), and that heritability and the number of categories are the most influential factors. Only for ordinal trait 2, with a density of 9k, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the predictive ability of the methods. In general, the BayesCπ method proved to be more efficient in the identification of relevant SNPs and in the ranking of individuals. Finally, there is a slight superiority of the BayesCπ method for the genomic prediction of ordinal traits. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1112 10.33837/msj.v3i1.1112 |
url |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1112 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33837/msj.v3i1.1112 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ifgoiano.edu.br/multiscience/article/view/1112/828 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 The authors info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 The authors |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi-Science Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020); 1-7 Multi-Science Journal; v. 3 n. 1 (2020); 1-7 2359-6902 2359-6902 reponame:Multi-Science Journal instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) instacron:IFGO |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) |
instacron_str |
IFGO |
institution |
IFGO |
reponame_str |
Multi-Science Journal |
collection |
Multi-Science Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Multi-Science Journal - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
guilhermeifgoiano@gmail.com || multiscience@ifgoiano.edu.br || wesley.andrade@ifgoiano.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798325176255905792 |