Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017 |
Resumo: | In order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged. |
id |
IIE-1_585208a7ed50e7ba1a4079ca13e77594 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-69842005000100017 |
network_acronym_str |
IIE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?TambaquiColossoma macropomumfish growthSchnute's modelCentral AmazonBrazilIn order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2005-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017Brazilian Journal of Biology v.65 n.1 2005reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/S1519-69842005000100017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPenna,M. A. HVillacorta-Corrêa,M. AWalter,T.Petrere-JR,M.eng2005-11-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842005000100017Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2005-11-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
title |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
spellingShingle |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? Penna,M. A. H Tambaqui Colossoma macropomum fish growth Schnute's model Central Amazon Brazil |
title_short |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
title_full |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
title_fullStr |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
title_sort |
Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? |
author |
Penna,M. A. H |
author_facet |
Penna,M. A. H Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A Walter,T. Petrere-JR,M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A Walter,T. Petrere-JR,M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Penna,M. A. H Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A Walter,T. Petrere-JR,M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tambaqui Colossoma macropomum fish growth Schnute's model Central Amazon Brazil |
topic |
Tambaqui Colossoma macropomum fish growth Schnute's model Central Amazon Brazil |
description |
In order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1519-69842005000100017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology v.65 n.1 2005 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) instacron:IIE |
instname_str |
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
instacron_str |
IIE |
institution |
IIE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br |
_version_ |
1752129875522617344 |