Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Penna,M. A. H
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A, Walter,T., Petrere-JR,M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Biology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017
Resumo: In order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged.
id IIE-1_585208a7ed50e7ba1a4079ca13e77594
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-69842005000100017
network_acronym_str IIE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository_id_str
spelling Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?TambaquiColossoma macropomumfish growthSchnute's modelCentral AmazonBrazilIn order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2005-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017Brazilian Journal of Biology v.65 n.1 2005reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biologyinstname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/S1519-69842005000100017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPenna,M. A. HVillacorta-Corrêa,M. AWalter,T.Petrere-JR,M.eng2005-11-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-69842005000100017Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br1678-43751519-6984opendoar:2005-11-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
title Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
spellingShingle Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
Penna,M. A. H
Tambaqui
Colossoma macropomum
fish growth
Schnute's model
Central Amazon
Brazil
title_short Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
title_full Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
title_fullStr Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
title_full_unstemmed Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
title_sort Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?
author Penna,M. A. H
author_facet Penna,M. A. H
Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A
Walter,T.
Petrere-JR,M.
author_role author
author2 Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A
Walter,T.
Petrere-JR,M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Penna,M. A. H
Villacorta-Corrêa,M. A
Walter,T.
Petrere-JR,M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tambaqui
Colossoma macropomum
fish growth
Schnute's model
Central Amazon
Brazil
topic Tambaqui
Colossoma macropomum
fish growth
Schnute's model
Central Amazon
Brazil
description In order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi' values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and L<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi' remains nearly unchanged.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-69842005000100017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1519-69842005000100017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology v.65 n.1 2005
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Biology
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Biology
collection Brazilian Journal of Biology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Biology - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjb@bjb.com.br||bjb@bjb.com.br
_version_ 1752129875522617344