Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Einstein (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000200009 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective Assess the content validity of the Elderly Health Assessment Tool with low education. Methods The data collection instrument/questionnaire was prepared and submitted to an expert panel comprising four healthcare professionals experienced in research on epidemiology of aging. The experts were allowed to suggest item inclusion/exclusion and were asked to rate the ability of individual items in questionnaire blocks to encompass target dimensions as “not valid”, “somewhat valid” or “valid”, using an interval scale. Percent agreement and the Content Validity Index were used as measurements of inter-rater agreement; the minimum acceptable inter-rater agreement was set at 80%. Results The mean instrument percent agreement rate was 86%, ranging from 63 to 99%, and from 50 to 100% between and within blocks respectively. The Mean Content Validity Index score was 93.47%, ranging from 50 to 100% between individual items. Conclusion The instrument showed acceptable psychometric properties for application in geriatric populations with low levels of education. It enabled identifying diseases and assisted in choice of strategies related to health of the elderly. |
id |
IIEPAE-1_624ee2af9e020d048879782d90ed52fb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-45082016000200009 |
network_acronym_str |
IIEPAE-1 |
network_name_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment InstrumentValidation studiesGeriatric assessmentAgedAgingPublic healthABSTRACT Objective Assess the content validity of the Elderly Health Assessment Tool with low education. Methods The data collection instrument/questionnaire was prepared and submitted to an expert panel comprising four healthcare professionals experienced in research on epidemiology of aging. The experts were allowed to suggest item inclusion/exclusion and were asked to rate the ability of individual items in questionnaire blocks to encompass target dimensions as “not valid”, “somewhat valid” or “valid”, using an interval scale. Percent agreement and the Content Validity Index were used as measurements of inter-rater agreement; the minimum acceptable inter-rater agreement was set at 80%. Results The mean instrument percent agreement rate was 86%, ranging from 63 to 99%, and from 50 to 100% between and within blocks respectively. The Mean Content Validity Index score was 93.47%, ranging from 50 to 100% between individual items. Conclusion The instrument showed acceptable psychometric properties for application in geriatric populations with low levels of education. It enabled identifying diseases and assisted in choice of strategies related to health of the elderly.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000200009einstein (São Paulo) v.14 n.2 2016reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3455info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPedreira,Rhaine Borges SantosRocha,Saulo VasconcelosSantos,Clarice Alves dosVasconcelos,Lélia Renata CarneiroReis,Martha Cerqueiraeng2016-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082016000200009Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2016-07-20T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
title |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
spellingShingle |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument Pedreira,Rhaine Borges Santos Validation studies Geriatric assessment Aged Aging Public health |
title_short |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
title_full |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
title_fullStr |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
title_sort |
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument |
author |
Pedreira,Rhaine Borges Santos |
author_facet |
Pedreira,Rhaine Borges Santos Rocha,Saulo Vasconcelos Santos,Clarice Alves dos Vasconcelos,Lélia Renata Carneiro Reis,Martha Cerqueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha,Saulo Vasconcelos Santos,Clarice Alves dos Vasconcelos,Lélia Renata Carneiro Reis,Martha Cerqueira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pedreira,Rhaine Borges Santos Rocha,Saulo Vasconcelos Santos,Clarice Alves dos Vasconcelos,Lélia Renata Carneiro Reis,Martha Cerqueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Validation studies Geriatric assessment Aged Aging Public health |
topic |
Validation studies Geriatric assessment Aged Aging Public health |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective Assess the content validity of the Elderly Health Assessment Tool with low education. Methods The data collection instrument/questionnaire was prepared and submitted to an expert panel comprising four healthcare professionals experienced in research on epidemiology of aging. The experts were allowed to suggest item inclusion/exclusion and were asked to rate the ability of individual items in questionnaire blocks to encompass target dimensions as “not valid”, “somewhat valid” or “valid”, using an interval scale. Percent agreement and the Content Validity Index were used as measurements of inter-rater agreement; the minimum acceptable inter-rater agreement was set at 80%. Results The mean instrument percent agreement rate was 86%, ranging from 63 to 99%, and from 50 to 100% between and within blocks respectively. The Mean Content Validity Index score was 93.47%, ranging from 50 to 100% between individual items. Conclusion The instrument showed acceptable psychometric properties for application in geriatric populations with low levels of education. It enabled identifying diseases and assisted in choice of strategies related to health of the elderly. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000200009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000200009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3455 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
einstein (São Paulo) v.14 n.2 2016 reponame:Einstein (São Paulo) instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) instacron:IIEPAE |
instname_str |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
instacron_str |
IIEPAE |
institution |
IIEPAE |
reponame_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
collection |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@einstein.br |
_version_ |
1752129908368211968 |