Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Breim,Maria Cecilia Santa Cruz
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Segre,Conceição Aparecida de Mattos, Lippi,Umberto Gazi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Einstein (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082010000300308
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of the modes of delivery on the health of newborns in a private maternity hospital in the city of São Paulo. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 1998, all patients consecutively admitted for deliveries were included in this cross-sectional retrospective study. A total of 8,457 medical records were analyzed, being excluded of the sample 460 multiple pregnancies and 517 pregnant women with obstetric and/or clinical disorders. The incidence of neonatal birth injury, respiratory distress and anoxia was analyzed, as well as birth weight, type of delivery and gestational age (according to Näegele and Capurro). Results: The final sample consisted of 7,480 neonates, and 69.6% were born by cesarean section, 24% vaginally and 6.4% through the vagina with the aid of forceps. A significant association was found between anoxia and the three types of delivery (p < 0.001). Respiratory distress was more frequent in cesarean delivery in newborns with gestational age superior to 37 weeks and in newborns weighing more than or equal to 2,500 g. Respiratory distress was significantly associated with cesarean delivery and/or forceps delivery, as compared with vaginal delivery, in the entire sample. Neonatal birth injury was associated with the use of forceps. In neonates born by cesarean section, anoxia was associated with lower gestational age estimated by the Capurro method and with lower weight. Conclusions: The abdominal approach is associated with greater morbidity of fetuses due to respiratory distress. Vaginal delivery is safer in newborns with more than 37 weeks of gestation and in those weighing more than 2,500 g.
id IIEPAE-1_bc58108ea14a41f37607e6aed7241cea
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-45082010000300308
network_acronym_str IIEPAE-1
network_name_str Einstein (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative studyNatural childbirthCesarean sectionObstetrical forcepsMorbidityObstetric labor complicationsComparative studyABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of the modes of delivery on the health of newborns in a private maternity hospital in the city of São Paulo. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 1998, all patients consecutively admitted for deliveries were included in this cross-sectional retrospective study. A total of 8,457 medical records were analyzed, being excluded of the sample 460 multiple pregnancies and 517 pregnant women with obstetric and/or clinical disorders. The incidence of neonatal birth injury, respiratory distress and anoxia was analyzed, as well as birth weight, type of delivery and gestational age (according to Näegele and Capurro). Results: The final sample consisted of 7,480 neonates, and 69.6% were born by cesarean section, 24% vaginally and 6.4% through the vagina with the aid of forceps. A significant association was found between anoxia and the three types of delivery (p < 0.001). Respiratory distress was more frequent in cesarean delivery in newborns with gestational age superior to 37 weeks and in newborns weighing more than or equal to 2,500 g. Respiratory distress was significantly associated with cesarean delivery and/or forceps delivery, as compared with vaginal delivery, in the entire sample. Neonatal birth injury was associated with the use of forceps. In neonates born by cesarean section, anoxia was associated with lower gestational age estimated by the Capurro method and with lower weight. Conclusions: The abdominal approach is associated with greater morbidity of fetuses due to respiratory distress. Vaginal delivery is safer in newborns with more than 37 weeks of gestation and in those weighing more than 2,500 g.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2010-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082010000300308einstein (São Paulo) v.8 n.3 2010reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.1590/s1679-45082010ao1658info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBreim,Maria Cecilia Santa CruzSegre,Conceição Aparecida de MattosLippi,Umberto Gazieng2017-03-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082010000300308Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2017-03-14T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
title Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
spellingShingle Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
Breim,Maria Cecilia Santa Cruz
Natural childbirth
Cesarean section
Obstetrical forceps
Morbidity
Obstetric labor complications
Comparative study
title_short Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
title_full Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
title_fullStr Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
title_sort Morbidity in neonates according to the mode of delivery: a comparative study
author Breim,Maria Cecilia Santa Cruz
author_facet Breim,Maria Cecilia Santa Cruz
Segre,Conceição Aparecida de Mattos
Lippi,Umberto Gazi
author_role author
author2 Segre,Conceição Aparecida de Mattos
Lippi,Umberto Gazi
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Breim,Maria Cecilia Santa Cruz
Segre,Conceição Aparecida de Mattos
Lippi,Umberto Gazi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Natural childbirth
Cesarean section
Obstetrical forceps
Morbidity
Obstetric labor complications
Comparative study
topic Natural childbirth
Cesarean section
Obstetrical forceps
Morbidity
Obstetric labor complications
Comparative study
description ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of the modes of delivery on the health of newborns in a private maternity hospital in the city of São Paulo. Methods: Between January 1995 and December 1998, all patients consecutively admitted for deliveries were included in this cross-sectional retrospective study. A total of 8,457 medical records were analyzed, being excluded of the sample 460 multiple pregnancies and 517 pregnant women with obstetric and/or clinical disorders. The incidence of neonatal birth injury, respiratory distress and anoxia was analyzed, as well as birth weight, type of delivery and gestational age (according to Näegele and Capurro). Results: The final sample consisted of 7,480 neonates, and 69.6% were born by cesarean section, 24% vaginally and 6.4% through the vagina with the aid of forceps. A significant association was found between anoxia and the three types of delivery (p < 0.001). Respiratory distress was more frequent in cesarean delivery in newborns with gestational age superior to 37 weeks and in newborns weighing more than or equal to 2,500 g. Respiratory distress was significantly associated with cesarean delivery and/or forceps delivery, as compared with vaginal delivery, in the entire sample. Neonatal birth injury was associated with the use of forceps. In neonates born by cesarean section, anoxia was associated with lower gestational age estimated by the Capurro method and with lower weight. Conclusions: The abdominal approach is associated with greater morbidity of fetuses due to respiratory distress. Vaginal delivery is safer in newborns with more than 37 weeks of gestation and in those weighing more than 2,500 g.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082010000300308
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082010000300308
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1679-45082010ao1658
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv einstein (São Paulo) v.8 n.3 2010
reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)
instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron:IIEPAE
instname_str Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron_str IIEPAE
institution IIEPAE
reponame_str Einstein (São Paulo)
collection Einstein (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@einstein.br
_version_ 1752129905837998080