Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Serralheiro,Fernando Cesar, Fonseca,Fernando Luiz Affonso, Ribeiro Junior,Onésimo Duarte, Adami,Fernando, Christofolini,Denise Maria, Bianco,Bianca, Barbosa,Caio Parente
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Einstein (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000300305
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the anesthetic techniques using propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and remifentanil associated with a paracervical block with lidocaine in performing ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte aspiration. Methods: A randomized double-blind clinical trial (#RBR-8kqqxh) performed in 61 women submitted to assisted reproductive treatment. The patients were divided into two groups: anesthetic induction with 1mcg/kg of fentanyl associated with 1.5mg/kg of propofol (FP Group, n=32), in comparison with anesthetic induction using 0.075mg/kg of midazolam associated with 0.25mcg/kg/min of remifentanil, and paracervical block with 3mL of 2% lidocaine (MRPB Group, n=29). Main outcome measures: human reproduction outcomes, modified Aldrete-Kroulik index, hemodynamic parameters, and salivary cortisol. Results: The results revealed a higher number of embryos formed in the FP Group (p50=2 versus 1; p=0.025), gestation rate two times higher in the FP Group (44.4% versus 22.2%; p=0.127), less time to reach AK=10 in the MRPB Group (p50=10 versus 2; p<0.001), and lower mean of hemodynamic parameters in the MRPB Group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol as well as with midazolam, remifentanil, and paracervical block offered satisfactory anesthetic conditions when performing assisted reproduction procedures, providing comfort for the patient and physician.
id IIEPAE-1_c304da9e57fcd9f574603d294c152a33
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-45082016000300305
network_acronym_str IIEPAE-1
network_name_str Einstein (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular punctureAnesthesiaReproductive techniquesFentanylPropofolMidazolamABSTRACT Objective: To compare the anesthetic techniques using propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and remifentanil associated with a paracervical block with lidocaine in performing ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte aspiration. Methods: A randomized double-blind clinical trial (#RBR-8kqqxh) performed in 61 women submitted to assisted reproductive treatment. The patients were divided into two groups: anesthetic induction with 1mcg/kg of fentanyl associated with 1.5mg/kg of propofol (FP Group, n=32), in comparison with anesthetic induction using 0.075mg/kg of midazolam associated with 0.25mcg/kg/min of remifentanil, and paracervical block with 3mL of 2% lidocaine (MRPB Group, n=29). Main outcome measures: human reproduction outcomes, modified Aldrete-Kroulik index, hemodynamic parameters, and salivary cortisol. Results: The results revealed a higher number of embryos formed in the FP Group (p50=2 versus 1; p=0.025), gestation rate two times higher in the FP Group (44.4% versus 22.2%; p=0.127), less time to reach AK=10 in the MRPB Group (p50=10 versus 2; p<0.001), and lower mean of hemodynamic parameters in the MRPB Group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol as well as with midazolam, remifentanil, and paracervical block offered satisfactory anesthetic conditions when performing assisted reproduction procedures, providing comfort for the patient and physician.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000300305einstein (São Paulo) v.14 n.3 2016reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3714info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins deSerralheiro,Fernando CesarFonseca,Fernando Luiz AffonsoRibeiro Junior,Onésimo DuarteAdami,FernandoChristofolini,Denise MariaBianco,BiancaBarbosa,Caio Parenteeng2016-10-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082016000300305Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2016-10-14T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
title Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
spellingShingle Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
Oliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins de
Anesthesia
Reproductive techniques
Fentanyl
Propofol
Midazolam
title_short Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
title_full Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
title_fullStr Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
title_full_unstemmed Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
title_sort Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture
author Oliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins de
author_facet Oliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins de
Serralheiro,Fernando Cesar
Fonseca,Fernando Luiz Affonso
Ribeiro Junior,Onésimo Duarte
Adami,Fernando
Christofolini,Denise Maria
Bianco,Bianca
Barbosa,Caio Parente
author_role author
author2 Serralheiro,Fernando Cesar
Fonseca,Fernando Luiz Affonso
Ribeiro Junior,Onésimo Duarte
Adami,Fernando
Christofolini,Denise Maria
Bianco,Bianca
Barbosa,Caio Parente
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira Júnior,Gilvandro Lins de
Serralheiro,Fernando Cesar
Fonseca,Fernando Luiz Affonso
Ribeiro Junior,Onésimo Duarte
Adami,Fernando
Christofolini,Denise Maria
Bianco,Bianca
Barbosa,Caio Parente
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anesthesia
Reproductive techniques
Fentanyl
Propofol
Midazolam
topic Anesthesia
Reproductive techniques
Fentanyl
Propofol
Midazolam
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the anesthetic techniques using propofol and fentanyl versus midazolam and remifentanil associated with a paracervical block with lidocaine in performing ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte aspiration. Methods: A randomized double-blind clinical trial (#RBR-8kqqxh) performed in 61 women submitted to assisted reproductive treatment. The patients were divided into two groups: anesthetic induction with 1mcg/kg of fentanyl associated with 1.5mg/kg of propofol (FP Group, n=32), in comparison with anesthetic induction using 0.075mg/kg of midazolam associated with 0.25mcg/kg/min of remifentanil, and paracervical block with 3mL of 2% lidocaine (MRPB Group, n=29). Main outcome measures: human reproduction outcomes, modified Aldrete-Kroulik index, hemodynamic parameters, and salivary cortisol. Results: The results revealed a higher number of embryos formed in the FP Group (p50=2 versus 1; p=0.025), gestation rate two times higher in the FP Group (44.4% versus 22.2%; p=0.127), less time to reach AK=10 in the MRPB Group (p50=10 versus 2; p<0.001), and lower mean of hemodynamic parameters in the MRPB Group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol as well as with midazolam, remifentanil, and paracervical block offered satisfactory anesthetic conditions when performing assisted reproduction procedures, providing comfort for the patient and physician.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000300305
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082016000300305
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3714
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv einstein (São Paulo) v.14 n.3 2016
reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)
instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron:IIEPAE
instname_str Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron_str IIEPAE
institution IIEPAE
reponame_str Einstein (São Paulo)
collection Einstein (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@einstein.br
_version_ 1752129908393377792