Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Independent Journal of Management & Production |
Texto Completo: | http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251 |
Resumo: | In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice |
id |
IJMP_e1075ae30644ffcf4c86af1c6909ff18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/251 |
network_acronym_str |
IJMP |
network_name_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisationsFormalisationtacitnessknowledge sharingknowledge creationaction researchinnovation processcase studyIn the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practiceIndependent2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/25110.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 182-2022236-269X2236-269Xreponame:Independent Journal of Management & Productioninstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)instacron:IJM&Penghttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/217http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/439Sousa, Maria JoséGonzález-Loureiro, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-24T12:36:34Zoai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/251Revistahttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/PUBhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/oaiijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||2236-269X2236-269Xopendoar:2024-04-24T12:36:34Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
title |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
spellingShingle |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations Sousa, Maria José Formalisation tacitness knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
title_short |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
title_full |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
title_fullStr |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
title_sort |
Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations |
author |
Sousa, Maria José |
author_facet |
Sousa, Maria José González-Loureiro, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
González-Loureiro, Miguel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Maria José González-Loureiro, Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Formalisation tacitness knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
topic |
Formalisation tacitness knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
description |
In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251 10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251 |
url |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/217 http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/439 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 182-202 2236-269X 2236-269X reponame:Independent Journal of Management & Production instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) instacron:IJM&P |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
instacron_str |
IJM&P |
institution |
IJM&P |
reponame_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
collection |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br|| |
_version_ |
1797220490428809216 |