Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Maria José
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: González-Loureiro, Miguel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Independent Journal of Management & Production
Texto Completo: http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251
Resumo: In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice
id IJMP_e1075ae30644ffcf4c86af1c6909ff18
oai_identifier_str oai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/251
network_acronym_str IJMP
network_name_str Independent Journal of Management & Production
repository_id_str
spelling Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisationsFormalisationtacitnessknowledge sharingknowledge creationaction researchinnovation processcase studyIn the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practiceIndependent2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/25110.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 182-2022236-269X2236-269Xreponame:Independent Journal of Management & Productioninstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)instacron:IJM&Penghttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/217http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/439Sousa, Maria JoséGonzález-Loureiro, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-24T12:36:34Zoai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/251Revistahttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/PUBhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/oaiijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||2236-269X2236-269Xopendoar:2024-04-24T12:36:34Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
spellingShingle Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
Sousa, Maria José
Formalisation
tacitness
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
title_short Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_full Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_fullStr Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_full_unstemmed Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_sort Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
author Sousa, Maria José
author_facet Sousa, Maria José
González-Loureiro, Miguel
author_role author
author2 González-Loureiro, Miguel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Maria José
González-Loureiro, Miguel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Formalisation
tacitness
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
topic Formalisation
tacitness
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
description In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade.The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251
10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251
url http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251
identifier_str_mv 10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/217
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/251/439
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Independent
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Independent
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 182-202
2236-269X
2236-269X
reponame:Independent Journal of Management & Production
instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)
instacron:IJM&P
instname_str Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)
instacron_str IJM&P
institution IJM&P
reponame_str Independent Journal of Management & Production
collection Independent Journal of Management & Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||
_version_ 1797220490428809216