KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice. |
id |
RCAP_f2ce9d70df63de599b0973eb71b20625 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/8015 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONSFormalisationtacitnesscommunities of practiceknowledge sharingknowledge creationaction researchinnovation processcase studyABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice.INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTIONRepositório ComumSousa, Maria José2015-03-11T16:24:53Z2015-012015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015eng10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-23T14:31:09Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/8015Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:18:53.016630Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
title |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
spellingShingle |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS Sousa, Maria José Formalisation tacitness communities of practice knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
title_short |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
title_full |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
title_fullStr |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
title_sort |
KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS |
author |
Sousa, Maria José |
author_facet |
Sousa, Maria José |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Comum |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Maria José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Formalisation tacitness communities of practice knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
topic |
Formalisation tacitness communities of practice knowledge sharing knowledge creation action research innovation process case study |
description |
ABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-11T16:24:53Z 2015-01 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135485687234560 |