KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Maria José
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015
Resumo: ABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice.
id RCAP_f2ce9d70df63de599b0973eb71b20625
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/8015
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONSFormalisationtacitnesscommunities of practiceknowledge sharingknowledge creationaction researchinnovation processcase studyABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice.INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTIONRepositório ComumSousa, Maria José2015-03-11T16:24:53Z2015-012015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015eng10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-23T14:31:09Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/8015Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:18:53.016630Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
title KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
spellingShingle KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
Sousa, Maria José
Formalisation
tacitness
communities of practice
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
title_short KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
title_full KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
title_fullStr KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
title_full_unstemmed KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
title_sort KNOWLEDGE VISION ON FORMALISATION VERSUS TACITNESS OF SHARING KNOWLEDGE IN INNOVATIVE LARGE ORGANISATIONS
author Sousa, Maria José
author_facet Sousa, Maria José
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Maria José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Formalisation
tacitness
communities of practice
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
topic Formalisation
tacitness
communities of practice
knowledge sharing
knowledge creation
action research
innovation process
case study
description ABSTRACT In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “whoknows- what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-11T16:24:53Z
2015-01
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/8015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135485687234560