Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Independent Journal of Management & Production |
Texto Completo: | http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265 |
Resumo: | In contemporary supply chain management, a company’s performance is largely dependent on its strategic choice of suppliers. The complexity of supplier evaluation and selection is driving the development of novel support techniques and their integration into multi-criteria decision-making processes. This review identifies the most prevalent approaches in the supply chain management literature (1998–2018), analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, and discusses the most popular supplier selection attributes. The non-conventional, emerging methods in domain literature are also discussed, and future research directions are proposed. Supplier selection approaches are classified into individual, integrated, and non-conventional approaches. To overcome the limitations associated with these tools when used individually, most of the published works have used integrated techniques, among which integrated fuzzy and analytic hierarchy process methods are most popular. We conclude that while some of the methodologies are common, the more non-conventional approaches, such as market utility-based models, are rarely used in the supplier selection literature, leaving much opportunity to further develop these less-used approaches and, ultimately, aid decision-makers in supply chain management. |
id |
IJMP_ffa570d7056d4f7acf7f5617858efe2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1265 |
network_acronym_str |
IJMP |
network_name_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critiqueSupply chain managementSupplier selectionVendor selectionMulti-criteria decision makingLiterature reviewIn contemporary supply chain management, a company’s performance is largely dependent on its strategic choice of suppliers. The complexity of supplier evaluation and selection is driving the development of novel support techniques and their integration into multi-criteria decision-making processes. This review identifies the most prevalent approaches in the supply chain management literature (1998–2018), analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, and discusses the most popular supplier selection attributes. The non-conventional, emerging methods in domain literature are also discussed, and future research directions are proposed. Supplier selection approaches are classified into individual, integrated, and non-conventional approaches. To overcome the limitations associated with these tools when used individually, most of the published works have used integrated techniques, among which integrated fuzzy and analytic hierarchy process methods are most popular. We conclude that while some of the methodologies are common, the more non-conventional approaches, such as market utility-based models, are rarely used in the supplier selection literature, leaving much opportunity to further develop these less-used approaches and, ultimately, aid decision-makers in supply chain management.Independent2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/126510.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1265Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 329-3522236-269X2236-269Xreponame:Independent Journal of Management & Productioninstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)instacron:IJM&Penghttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265/1724http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265/1725Copyright (c) 2021 Hayk Manucharyanhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessManucharyan, Hayk2021-02-01T16:00:25Zoai:www.ijmp.jor.br:article/1265Revistahttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/PUBhttp://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/oaiijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br||2236-269X2236-269Xopendoar:2021-02-01T16:00:25Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
title |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
spellingShingle |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique Manucharyan, Hayk Supply chain management Supplier selection Vendor selection Multi-criteria decision making Literature review |
title_short |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
title_full |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
title_fullStr |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
title_sort |
Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literature critique |
author |
Manucharyan, Hayk |
author_facet |
Manucharyan, Hayk |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Manucharyan, Hayk |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Supply chain management Supplier selection Vendor selection Multi-criteria decision making Literature review |
topic |
Supply chain management Supplier selection Vendor selection Multi-criteria decision making Literature review |
description |
In contemporary supply chain management, a company’s performance is largely dependent on its strategic choice of suppliers. The complexity of supplier evaluation and selection is driving the development of novel support techniques and their integration into multi-criteria decision-making processes. This review identifies the most prevalent approaches in the supply chain management literature (1998–2018), analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, and discusses the most popular supplier selection attributes. The non-conventional, emerging methods in domain literature are also discussed, and future research directions are proposed. Supplier selection approaches are classified into individual, integrated, and non-conventional approaches. To overcome the limitations associated with these tools when used individually, most of the published works have used integrated techniques, among which integrated fuzzy and analytic hierarchy process methods are most popular. We conclude that while some of the methodologies are common, the more non-conventional approaches, such as market utility-based models, are rarely used in the supplier selection literature, leaving much opportunity to further develop these less-used approaches and, ultimately, aid decision-makers in supply chain management. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265 10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1265 |
url |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1265 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265/1724 http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/1265/1725 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Hayk Manucharyan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Hayk Manucharyan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Independent Journal of Management & Production; 329-352 2236-269X 2236-269X reponame:Independent Journal of Management & Production instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) instacron:IJM&P |
instname_str |
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
instacron_str |
IJM&P |
institution |
IJM&P |
reponame_str |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
collection |
Independent Journal of Management & Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Independent Journal of Management & Production - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ijmp@ijmp.jor.br||paulo@paulorodrigues.pro.br|| |
_version_ |
1797220492984188928 |