Secession, Democracy & Human Rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reimers, Patrick
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/861
Resumo: The United Nations (UN) officially declared "self-determination" as a right of all peoples. Although the United Nations Charter (1945) offers some guidelines for the application of this right, there are major challenges in its implementation in the case of secessionist tendencies. Faced with this situation, the economist Jörg Guido Hülsmann, in his essay Secession and the Production of Defense, discussed not only the argument that pure private production is always superior to public and compulsory schemes, but also the current process of secession which, should always be justified against violent and coercive behavior of governments against (part of) its population. Hülsmann's ideas are presented in the contrast of the latest secessionist movements in Catalonia and Scotland, and in combination with Hayek's concept of "spontaneous order." The separatist movementin Catalonia is also analyzed based on the ideas of political scientist Margaret Moore, who advocates three types of normative theories that can justify the right to secession.
id IMB-1_079f1f98a2ccbb72b5e721db9e8a9876
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/861
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling Secession, Democracy & Human RightsSecesion, Democracia & Derechos HumanosSecessão, Democracia e Direitos HumanosSecessãoDireitos humanosDemocraciaCatalunhaSeparatismoHuman RightsSecessionDemocracyLiberatarianismCataloniaSeparatismSecesiónCataluñaSeparatismoDerechos humanosDemocraciaThe United Nations (UN) officially declared "self-determination" as a right of all peoples. Although the United Nations Charter (1945) offers some guidelines for the application of this right, there are major challenges in its implementation in the case of secessionist tendencies. Faced with this situation, the economist Jörg Guido Hülsmann, in his essay Secession and the Production of Defense, discussed not only the argument that pure private production is always superior to public and compulsory schemes, but also the current process of secession which, should always be justified against violent and coercive behavior of governments against (part of) its population. Hülsmann's ideas are presented in the contrast of the latest secessionist movements in Catalonia and Scotland, and in combination with Hayek's concept of "spontaneous order." The separatist movementin Catalonia is also analyzed based on the ideas of political scientist Margaret Moore, who advocates three types of normative theories that can justify the right to secession.Las Naciones Unidas (ONU) declaró oficialmente la "autodeterminación" como un derecho de todos los pueblos. Aunque la Carta de las Naciones Unidas (1945) ofrece algunas directrices para la aplicación de este derecho, existen grandes desafíos en cuanto a su implementación en el caso de tendencias secesionistas. Frente a ello, el economistaJörg Guido Hülsmann, en su ensayo Secession and the Production of Defense, discutió no sólo el argumento que la producción privada pura es siempre superior a los esquemas públicos y compulsivos, sino también el proceso actual de secesión que, como afirma , siempre puede ser justificado contra un comportamiento violento y coercitivo de gobiernos contra (parte) de su población. Las ideas de Hülsmann se presentan en correlación con los últimos movimientos secesionistas en Cataluña y Escocia, en combinación con el concepto de "orden espontáneo" de Hayek. El movimiento separatista en Cataluña también es analizado con base en las ideas del científico político Margaret Moore, que defiende tres tipos de teorías normativas que pueden justificar el derecho a la secesión.As Nações Unidas (ONU) declararam oficialmente a “autodeterminação” como um direito de todos os povos. Embora a Carta das Nações Unidas (1945) ofereça algumas diretrizes para a aplicação desse direito, existem grandes desafios quanto à sua implementação no caso de tendências secessionistas. Frente a isso, o economista Jörg Guido Hülsmann, em seu ensaio Secession and the Production of Defense, discutiu não apenas o argumento que a produção privada pura é sempre superior aos esquemas públicos e compulsórios, mas também o processo atual de secessão que, como afirma, pode sempre ser justificado contra um comportamento violento e coercivo de governos contra (parte) de sua população. As ideias de Hülsmann são apresentadas em correlação aos últimos movimentos secessionistas na Catalunha e na Escócia, em combinação com o conceito de “ordem espontânea” de Hayek. O movimento separatista na Catalunha também é analisado com base nas ideias da cientista política Margaret Moore, que defende três tipos de teorias normativas que podem justificar o direito à secessão.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/86110.30800/mises.2019.v7.861MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Apr)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Abr)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Abr)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBenghttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/861/632Copyright (c) 2019 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReimers, Patrick2019-06-08T02:31:01Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/861Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:01Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
Secesion, Democracia & Derechos Humanos
Secessão, Democracia e Direitos Humanos
title Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
spellingShingle Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
Reimers, Patrick
Secessão
Direitos humanos
Democracia
Catalunha
Separatismo
Human Rights
Secession
Democracy
Liberatarianism
Catalonia
Separatism
Secesión
Cataluña
Separatismo
Derechos humanos
Democracia
title_short Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
title_full Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
title_fullStr Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
title_sort Secession, Democracy & Human Rights
author Reimers, Patrick
author_facet Reimers, Patrick
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reimers, Patrick
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Secessão
Direitos humanos
Democracia
Catalunha
Separatismo
Human Rights
Secession
Democracy
Liberatarianism
Catalonia
Separatism
Secesión
Cataluña
Separatismo
Derechos humanos
Democracia
topic Secessão
Direitos humanos
Democracia
Catalunha
Separatismo
Human Rights
Secession
Democracy
Liberatarianism
Catalonia
Separatism
Secesión
Cataluña
Separatismo
Derechos humanos
Democracia
description The United Nations (UN) officially declared "self-determination" as a right of all peoples. Although the United Nations Charter (1945) offers some guidelines for the application of this right, there are major challenges in its implementation in the case of secessionist tendencies. Faced with this situation, the economist Jörg Guido Hülsmann, in his essay Secession and the Production of Defense, discussed not only the argument that pure private production is always superior to public and compulsory schemes, but also the current process of secession which, should always be justified against violent and coercive behavior of governments against (part of) its population. Hülsmann's ideas are presented in the contrast of the latest secessionist movements in Catalonia and Scotland, and in combination with Hayek's concept of "spontaneous order." The separatist movementin Catalonia is also analyzed based on the ideas of political scientist Margaret Moore, who advocates three types of normative theories that can justify the right to secession.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/861
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.861
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/861
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.861
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/861/632
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Apr)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Abr)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Jan-Abr)
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313181830971392