The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bernardo, Marcel Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Nori, Rodrigo Braian, Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113
Resumo: Most of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence.
id IMB-1_13fa70c768d9eff22011a177760ac0f4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1113
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and EthnographyLa Historia de la Moneda: Una propuesta de unión entre Teoría Económica y EtnografíaA História da Moeda: Uma proposta de união entre Teoria Econômica e EtnografiaEconomiaEtnografiaHistória da MoedaEconomyEthnographyHisptory of moneyEconomíaEtnografíaHistoria de la MonedaMost of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence.La mayor parte de la literatura económica apunta que el dinero surgió como fruto de la división del trabajo y con el propósito de superar el problema de la doble coincidencia de deseos. Sin embargo, la etnografía presenta otras consideraciones, demostrando que no hay evidencias de ninguna sociedad, hasta entonces conocida, que haya realizado ampliamente el trueque para después crear el dinero. En este contexto, el presente artículo pretende explorar el choque entre los diferentes campos de conocimiento referentes al estudio del origen de la moneda, apuntando elementos que puedan ser convergentes, aliando teoría económica y pruebas históricas.maior parte da literatura econômica aponta que o dinheiro surgiu como fruto da divisão do trabalho e com o propósito de superar o problema da dupla coincidência de desejos. Entretanto, a etnografia apresenta outras considerações, demonstrando que não há evidências de nenhuma sociedade, até então conhecida, que tenha realizado amplamente o escambo para depois criar o dinheiro. Nesse contexto, o presente artigo pretende explorar o choque entre os diferentes campos de conhecimento referentes ao estudo da origem da moeda, apontando elementos que possam ser convergentes, aliando teoria econômica e registros históricos.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/111310.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113/647Bernardo, Marcel PereiraNori, Rodrigo BraianBernardelli, Luan Viníciusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-07T16:54:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1113Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2020-04-07T16:54:48Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
La Historia de la Moneda: Una propuesta de unión entre Teoría Económica y Etnografía
A História da Moeda: Uma proposta de união entre Teoria Econômica e Etnografia
title The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
spellingShingle The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
Bernardo, Marcel Pereira
Economia
Etnografia
História da Moeda
Economy
Ethnography
Hisptory of money
Economía
Etnografía
Historia de la Moneda
title_short The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
title_full The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
title_fullStr The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
title_full_unstemmed The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
title_sort The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
author Bernardo, Marcel Pereira
author_facet Bernardo, Marcel Pereira
Nori, Rodrigo Braian
Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius
author_role author
author2 Nori, Rodrigo Braian
Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bernardo, Marcel Pereira
Nori, Rodrigo Braian
Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Economia
Etnografia
História da Moeda
Economy
Ethnography
Hisptory of money
Economía
Etnografía
Historia de la Moneda
topic Economia
Etnografia
História da Moeda
Economy
Ethnography
Hisptory of money
Economía
Etnografía
Historia de la Moneda
description Most of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113/647
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313181873963008

Registros relacionados