The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113 |
Resumo: | Most of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence. |
id |
IMB-1_13fa70c768d9eff22011a177760ac0f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1113 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and EthnographyLa Historia de la Moneda: Una propuesta de unión entre Teoría Económica y EtnografíaA História da Moeda: Uma proposta de união entre Teoria Econômica e EtnografiaEconomiaEtnografiaHistória da MoedaEconomyEthnographyHisptory of moneyEconomíaEtnografíaHistoria de la MonedaMost of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence.La mayor parte de la literatura económica apunta que el dinero surgió como fruto de la división del trabajo y con el propósito de superar el problema de la doble coincidencia de deseos. Sin embargo, la etnografía presenta otras consideraciones, demostrando que no hay evidencias de ninguna sociedad, hasta entonces conocida, que haya realizado ampliamente el trueque para después crear el dinero. En este contexto, el presente artículo pretende explorar el choque entre los diferentes campos de conocimiento referentes al estudio del origen de la moneda, apuntando elementos que puedan ser convergentes, aliando teoría económica y pruebas históricas.maior parte da literatura econômica aponta que o dinheiro surgiu como fruto da divisão do trabalho e com o propósito de superar o problema da dupla coincidência de desejos. Entretanto, a etnografia apresenta outras considerações, demonstrando que não há evidências de nenhuma sociedade, até então conhecida, que tenha realizado amplamente o escambo para depois criar o dinheiro. Nesse contexto, o presente artigo pretende explorar o choque entre os diferentes campos de conhecimento referentes ao estudo da origem da moeda, apontando elementos que possam ser convergentes, aliando teoria econômica e registros históricos.Instituto Mises Brasil2019-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/111310.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113/647Bernardo, Marcel PereiraNori, Rodrigo BraianBernardelli, Luan Viníciusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-07T16:54:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1113Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2020-04-07T16:54:48Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography La Historia de la Moneda: Una propuesta de unión entre Teoría Económica y Etnografía A História da Moeda: Uma proposta de união entre Teoria Econômica e Etnografia |
title |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
spellingShingle |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography Bernardo, Marcel Pereira Economia Etnografia História da Moeda Economy Ethnography Hisptory of money Economía Etnografía Historia de la Moneda |
title_short |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
title_full |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
title_fullStr |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
title_full_unstemmed |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
title_sort |
The history of money: a union proposal between Economic Theory and Ethnography |
author |
Bernardo, Marcel Pereira |
author_facet |
Bernardo, Marcel Pereira Nori, Rodrigo Braian Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nori, Rodrigo Braian Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernardo, Marcel Pereira Nori, Rodrigo Braian Bernardelli, Luan Vinícius |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economia Etnografia História da Moeda Economy Ethnography Hisptory of money Economía Etnografía Historia de la Moneda |
topic |
Economia Etnografia História da Moeda Economy Ethnography Hisptory of money Economía Etnografía Historia de la Moneda |
description |
Most of the economic literature asserts that money arose because of the division of labor and with the purpose of overcoming the problem of double coincidence of wants. However, ethnography presents other considerations, demonstrating that there is no evidence of any society hitherto known which first bartered and then created money. The present article intends to explore the clash between two different fields of knowledge regarding the origins of money, pointing out converging elements proved by theoretical and historical evidence. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113 10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1113 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1113/647 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (May-Aug) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): MISES Journal 2019 (Mai-Ago) 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181873963008 |