Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1378 |
Resumo: | This article investigates Bastiat's criticism of Proudhon's proposal to abolish interest by establishing the Bank of the People. The controversy between the two authors is examined in the light of the peculiarities of the economic theory developed by Bastiat, which include elements extracted from the works of Jean-Baptiste Say, Destutt de Tracy, and Charles Comte. We will argue that the merit and limitations of Bastiat's arguments in the debate reflect the tension between the subjective and objective elements present in his theory. |
id |
IMB-1_14132d01c9a66bbf6d3e59550feda3d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1378 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with ProudhonBastiat y la naturaleza de los intereses: el debate con ProudhonBastiat e a Natureza dos Juros: o debate com ProudhonBastiatProudhonplutologiajurosBastiatProudhonplutologyinterest ratesBAstiatProudhonplutologiainterésThis article investigates Bastiat's criticism of Proudhon's proposal to abolish interest by establishing the Bank of the People. The controversy between the two authors is examined in the light of the peculiarities of the economic theory developed by Bastiat, which include elements extracted from the works of Jean-Baptiste Say, Destutt de Tracy, and Charles Comte. We will argue that the merit and limitations of Bastiat's arguments in the debate reflect the tension between the subjective and objective elements present in his theory. Este artículo investiga la crítica de Bastiat a la propuesta de Proudhon de abolir el interés del capital mediante el establecimiento del Banco del Pueblo. La controversia entre los dos autores se examina a la luz de las peculiaridades de la teoría económica desarrollada por Bastiat, que reúne elementos extraídos de las obras de J.-B. Say, Destutt de Tracy y Charles Comte. Argumentaremos que el mérito y las limitaciones de los argumentos utilizados por Bastiat en el debate reflejan la tensión entre los elementos subjetivos y objetivos presentes en la concepción teórica del autor. Este artigo investiga a crítica feita por Bastiat à proposta de Proudhon de abolição dos juros do capital, através do estabelecimento do Banco do Povo. A controvérsia entre os dois autores é examinada à luz das peculiaridades da teoria econômica desenvolvida por Bastiat, que reúne elementos extraídos das obras de Jean-Baptiste Say, Destutt de Tracy e Charles Comte. Argumentaremos que o mérito e as limitações dos argumentos utilizados por Bastiat no debate refletem a tensão existente entre os elementos subjetivos e objetivos presentes na concepção teórica do autor.Instituto Mises Brasil2021-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/137810.30800/mises.2021.v9.1378MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Yearly Continuous PublicationMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Publicación Anual ContinuaMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 9 (2021): Publicação Contínua2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1378/692Barbieri, Fabioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-07T18:46:27Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1378Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2022-03-07T18:46:27Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon Bastiat y la naturaleza de los intereses: el debate con Proudhon Bastiat e a Natureza dos Juros: o debate com Proudhon |
title |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
spellingShingle |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon Barbieri, Fabio Bastiat Proudhon plutologia juros Bastiat Proudhon plutology interest rates BAstiat Proudhon plutologia interés |
title_short |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
title_full |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
title_fullStr |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
title_sort |
Bastiat and the nature of interest: the debate with Proudhon |
author |
Barbieri, Fabio |
author_facet |
Barbieri, Fabio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbieri, Fabio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bastiat Proudhon plutologia juros Bastiat Proudhon plutology interest rates BAstiat Proudhon plutologia interés |
topic |
Bastiat Proudhon plutologia juros Bastiat Proudhon plutology interest rates BAstiat Proudhon plutologia interés |
description |
This article investigates Bastiat's criticism of Proudhon's proposal to abolish interest by establishing the Bank of the People. The controversy between the two authors is examined in the light of the peculiarities of the economic theory developed by Bastiat, which include elements extracted from the works of Jean-Baptiste Say, Destutt de Tracy, and Charles Comte. We will argue that the merit and limitations of Bastiat's arguments in the debate reflect the tension between the subjective and objective elements present in his theory. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1378 10.30800/mises.2021.v9.1378 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1378 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2021.v9.1378 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1378/692 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Yearly Continuous Publication MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Publicación Anual Continua MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 9 (2021): Publicação Contínua 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313182058512384 |