In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rothbard, Murray N.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/711
Resumo: In this article, the author develops an analysis of the methodological controversy between Fritz Machlup and Terence W. Hutchison. While Hutchison rejects the views of Ludwig von Mises and at the same time considers that Machlup does nothing but try to provide a methodological framework to Mises’ proposals, Machlup, by his turn, is located distant from Mises and near the positivist tradition in economic methodology. From the perception that both professor Mises and “extreme apriorism” remained without a proper defense in the debate, the author argues in defense of the Kantian apriorism endorsed by Mises.
id IMB-1_636e49e849fa58bdc1855074f1fc3183
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/711
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”Em Defesa do “Apriorismo Extremo”ApriorismoLudwig von MisesFritz MachlupTerence W. HutchinsonMetodologia EconômicaApriorismLudwig von MisesFritz MachlupTerence W. HutchinsonEconomic MethodologyIn this article, the author develops an analysis of the methodological controversy between Fritz Machlup and Terence W. Hutchison. While Hutchison rejects the views of Ludwig von Mises and at the same time considers that Machlup does nothing but try to provide a methodological framework to Mises’ proposals, Machlup, by his turn, is located distant from Mises and near the positivist tradition in economic methodology. From the perception that both professor Mises and “extreme apriorism” remained without a proper defense in the debate, the author argues in defense of the Kantian apriorism endorsed by Mises.Neste artigo, o autor elabora uma análise da controvérsia metodológica entre Fritz Machlup e Terence W. Hutchison. Enquanto Hutchison rejeita os posicionamentos de Ludwig von Mises e, ao mesmo tempo, considera que Malchup não faz senão tentar proporcionar um arcabouço metodológico para as propostas de Mises, Machlup, por sua vez, situa-se distante de Mises e se aproxima da tradição positivista na metodologia econômica. A partir da percepção de que tanto o professor Mises quanto o “apriorismo extremo” permaneceram sem uma defesa apropriada no debate, o autor argumenta em defesa do apriorismo kantiano endossado por Mises.Instituto Mises Brasil2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPrinted JournalRevista Impressaapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/71110.30800/mises.2015.v3.711MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015); 31-37MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2015); 31-37MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 1 (2015); 31-372594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/711/403Rothbard, Murray N.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:41Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/711Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:41Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
Em Defesa do “Apriorismo Extremo”
title In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
spellingShingle In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
Rothbard, Murray N.
Apriorismo
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Metodologia Econômica
Apriorism
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Economic Methodology
title_short In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
title_full In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
title_fullStr In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
title_full_unstemmed In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
title_sort In Defense of “Extreme Apriorism”
author Rothbard, Murray N.
author_facet Rothbard, Murray N.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rothbard, Murray N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apriorismo
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Metodologia Econômica
Apriorism
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Economic Methodology
topic Apriorismo
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Metodologia Econômica
Apriorism
Ludwig von Mises
Fritz Machlup
Terence W. Hutchinson
Economic Methodology
description In this article, the author develops an analysis of the methodological controversy between Fritz Machlup and Terence W. Hutchison. While Hutchison rejects the views of Ludwig von Mises and at the same time considers that Machlup does nothing but try to provide a methodological framework to Mises’ proposals, Machlup, by his turn, is located distant from Mises and near the positivist tradition in economic methodology. From the perception that both professor Mises and “extreme apriorism” remained without a proper defense in the debate, the author argues in defense of the Kantian apriorism endorsed by Mises.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Printed Journal
Revista Impressa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/711
10.30800/mises.2015.v3.711
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/711
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2015.v3.711
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/711/403
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015); 31-37
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2015); 31-37
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 1 (2015); 31-37
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313181153591296

Registros relacionados