Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/699 |
Resumo: | Since its revival in the early 1970s, what was called “Austrian economics” has been regarded by most of its contemporary adherents as the outgrowth of a unified tradition that can be traced back to Carl Menger. This paper challenges this view and argues that in fact two very different traditions grew out of Menger’s work. One tradition can be traced back to the works of F. A. Hayek to Friedrich Wieser, one of Menger’s most prominent followers. The other tradition stems from the writings of Menger’s other leading disciple, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, and includes the latter’s student Ludwig von Mises. This essay defends the thesis that these two separate traditions exist and have been confused with modern Austrians. |
id |
IMB-1_867161a675742beb4867b9e36306e49d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/699 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mises and Hayek DehomogenizedMises e Hayek DesomogeneizadosEconomia AustríacaLudwig von MisesF. A. HayekIsrael KirznerAustrian EconomicsLudwig von MisesF. A. HayekIsrael KirznerSince its revival in the early 1970s, what was called “Austrian economics” has been regarded by most of its contemporary adherents as the outgrowth of a unified tradition that can be traced back to Carl Menger. This paper challenges this view and argues that in fact two very different traditions grew out of Menger’s work. One tradition can be traced back to the works of F. A. Hayek to Friedrich Wieser, one of Menger’s most prominent followers. The other tradition stems from the writings of Menger’s other leading disciple, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, and includes the latter’s student Ludwig von Mises. This essay defends the thesis that these two separate traditions exist and have been confused with modern Austrians.Desde seu renascimento no início dos anos 1970, o que veio a se chamar de “Economia Austríaca” tem sido considerado, pela maior parte de seus adeptos contemporâneos, como a continuação de uma tradição unificada que pode ser rastreada até Carl Menger. Este artigo desafia essa perspectiva e argumenta que, de fato, duas tradições muito diferentes emergiram do trabalho de Menger. Uma tradição pode ser rastreada, através da obra de F. A. Hayek, a Friedrich Wieser, um dos dois seguidores mais proeminentes de Menger. A outra tradição emana dos escritos do outro discípulo principal de Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, e inclui seu aluno Ludwig von Mises. Este ensaio defende a tese de que essas duas tradições separadas existem e foram confundidas pelos austríacos modernos.Instituto Mises Brasil2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/69910.30800/mises.2014.v2.699MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014); 651-676MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014); 651-676MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 2 n. 2 (2014); 651-6762594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/699/393Salerno, Joseph T.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:42Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/699Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:42Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized Mises e Hayek Desomogeneizados |
title |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
spellingShingle |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized Salerno, Joseph T. Economia Austríaca Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner Austrian Economics Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner |
title_short |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
title_full |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
title_fullStr |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
title_sort |
Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized |
author |
Salerno, Joseph T. |
author_facet |
Salerno, Joseph T. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salerno, Joseph T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economia Austríaca Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner Austrian Economics Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner |
topic |
Economia Austríaca Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner Austrian Economics Ludwig von Mises F. A. Hayek Israel Kirzner |
description |
Since its revival in the early 1970s, what was called “Austrian economics” has been regarded by most of its contemporary adherents as the outgrowth of a unified tradition that can be traced back to Carl Menger. This paper challenges this view and argues that in fact two very different traditions grew out of Menger’s work. One tradition can be traced back to the works of F. A. Hayek to Friedrich Wieser, one of Menger’s most prominent followers. The other tradition stems from the writings of Menger’s other leading disciple, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, and includes the latter’s student Ludwig von Mises. This essay defends the thesis that these two separate traditions exist and have been confused with modern Austrians. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/699 10.30800/mises.2014.v2.699 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/699 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2014.v2.699 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/699/393 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014); 651-676 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014); 651-676 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 2 n. 2 (2014); 651-676 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181147299840 |