Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tang, Ying
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Block, Walter, Gordon, David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1395
Resumo: Neoclassic economic theory regards equilibrium, whether general or partial, as a crucially important foundation of the dismal science[1]. In the view of mainstream economists, the general equilibrium framework not only an investigation of the economy in terms of its perfect qualities, but also is suitable as an end or goal of action. The Austrian school, in contrast, sees equilibrium (or the evenly rotating economy - ERE) merely as a tendency for economic activities to move us in that direction, but it is never attained. Praxeological economics has thus concentrated not on equilibrium, but on the process by which the market moves toward it. Since the process of shifting resources to meet these ends cannot be achieved spontaneously, entrepreneurship plays a key role. In Mises and Rothbard’s view, entrepreneurship involves uncertainty bearing which beyond the alertness emphasized by Hayek and Kirzner; on the other hand, unlike Lachmann looks the economy as a kaleidoscope and rejects the ERE, Mises and Rothbard regard the ERE as an indispensable way to understand the economy.   [1] As Frank H. Hahn said “Whatever economics is used or thought about, equilibrium is a central organizing concept.” (Hahn 1984: 43). Many economists and philosophers of science consider mathematical neoclassical general equilibrium theory as one of the peak achievements of economics (Rosenberg, 1992). Tieben (2012) stated that policy-makers and theorists of all schools of economics all use some form of equilibrium theory to develop their ideas and support their main theoretical and political claims. Lawson (2005) indicated that the equilibrium concept is a major cause of controversy between different schools of economic thought. A.W. Bob Coats even deems it the case that “economics has been dominated throughout its history by a single paradigm – the theory of economic equilibrium via the market mechanism.” (Coats 1969: 292).
id IMB-1_a66868f949751f7ef8b75406a5be1ff0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1395
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling Entrepreneurship and EquilibriumEmprendimiento y EquilibrioEmpreendedorismo e Equilíbrioeconomia uniformemente circularpraxeologiaempreendedorismoprocesso de mercadoequilíbrioEvenly Rotating EconomypraxeologyentrepreneurshipMarket processequilibriumEconomía de rotación uniformepraxeologíaemprendimientoProceso de mercadoequilibrioNeoclassic economic theory regards equilibrium, whether general or partial, as a crucially important foundation of the dismal science[1]. In the view of mainstream economists, the general equilibrium framework not only an investigation of the economy in terms of its perfect qualities, but also is suitable as an end or goal of action. The Austrian school, in contrast, sees equilibrium (or the evenly rotating economy - ERE) merely as a tendency for economic activities to move us in that direction, but it is never attained. Praxeological economics has thus concentrated not on equilibrium, but on the process by which the market moves toward it. Since the process of shifting resources to meet these ends cannot be achieved spontaneously, entrepreneurship plays a key role. In Mises and Rothbard’s view, entrepreneurship involves uncertainty bearing which beyond the alertness emphasized by Hayek and Kirzner; on the other hand, unlike Lachmann looks the economy as a kaleidoscope and rejects the ERE, Mises and Rothbard regard the ERE as an indispensable way to understand the economy.   [1] As Frank H. Hahn said “Whatever economics is used or thought about, equilibrium is a central organizing concept.” (Hahn 1984: 43). Many economists and philosophers of science consider mathematical neoclassical general equilibrium theory as one of the peak achievements of economics (Rosenberg, 1992). Tieben (2012) stated that policy-makers and theorists of all schools of economics all use some form of equilibrium theory to develop their ideas and support their main theoretical and political claims. Lawson (2005) indicated that the equilibrium concept is a major cause of controversy between different schools of economic thought. A.W. Bob Coats even deems it the case that “economics has been dominated throughout its history by a single paradigm – the theory of economic equilibrium via the market mechanism.” (Coats 1969: 292).La teoría económica neoclásica considera el equilibrio, ya sea en forma general o parcial, como un importante fundamento de la ciencia lúgubre. En opinión de los economistas de la corriente principal, el marco de equilibrio general ofrece no solo una investigación de la economía en términos de sus cualidades perfectas,sino también es adecuado como fin o meta de acción. La escuela austríaca, por el contrario, ve el equilibrio (o la economía de rotación uniforme - ERE) simplemente como un tendencia de las actividades económicas para movernos en esa dirección, pero nunca se alcanza. La economía praxeológica se ha concentrado, por lo tanto, no en el equilibrio, sino en el proceso por el que el mercado se mueve hacia ella. Debido a que el proceso de transferencia de recursos para satisfacer estos fines no se pueden alcanzar de forma espontánea, el emprendimiento juega un papel clave. En opinión de Mises y Rothbard, el emprendimiento implica una carga de incertidumbre que va más allá del estado de alerta enfatizado por Hayek y Kirzner. Por otro lado, a diferencia de Lachmann, quien ve la economía como un caleidoscopio y rechaza la ERE, Mises y Rothbard consideran la ERE como una herramienta indispensable para entender la economía.A teoria econômica neoclássica considera o equilíbrio, seja geral ou parcial, como base fundamental da ciência sombria. Na visão dos economistas do mainstream, a estrutura do equilíbrio geral oferece, não apenas oferece uma análise da economia em termos de suas qualidades perfeitas, mas também é adequada como fim ou objetivo de ação. Em contraste, a Escola Austríaca considera o equilíbrio (ou a economia uniformemente circular - ERE) apenas como a direção para a qual as atividades econômicas tendem a se mover, porém nunca é atingido. Assim, a economia praxeológica concentra-se não no equilíbrio, mas no processo de mercado que leva a ele. Como o processo de transferir recursos para atender esses fins não pode ser atingido espontaneamente, o empreendedorismo tem um papel central. Na visão de Mises e Rothbard, o empreendedorismo envolve incerteza, indo além do estado de alerta enfatizado por Hayek e Kirzner. Por outro lado, diferentemente deLachmann, que analisa a economia como um caleidoscópio e rejeita a economia uniformemente circular, Mises e Rothbard a consideram uma ferramenta indispensável para entender a economia.Instituto Mises Brasil2021-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/139510.30800/mises.2021.v9.1395MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Yearly Continuous PublicationMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Publicación Anual ContinuaMISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 9 (2021): Publicação Contínua2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBenghttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1395/709Copyright (c) 2021 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economicshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTang, YingBlock, WalterGordon, David2022-03-07T18:46:27Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1395Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2022-03-07T18:46:27Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
Emprendimiento y Equilibrio
Empreendedorismo e Equilíbrio
title Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
spellingShingle Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
Tang, Ying
economia uniformemente circular
praxeologia
empreendedorismo
processo de mercado
equilíbrio
Evenly Rotating Economy
praxeology
entrepreneurship
Market process
equilibrium
Economía de rotación uniforme
praxeología
emprendimiento
Proceso de mercado
equilibrio
title_short Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
title_full Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
title_fullStr Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
title_full_unstemmed Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
title_sort Entrepreneurship and Equilibrium
author Tang, Ying
author_facet Tang, Ying
Block, Walter
Gordon, David
author_role author
author2 Block, Walter
Gordon, David
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tang, Ying
Block, Walter
Gordon, David
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv economia uniformemente circular
praxeologia
empreendedorismo
processo de mercado
equilíbrio
Evenly Rotating Economy
praxeology
entrepreneurship
Market process
equilibrium
Economía de rotación uniforme
praxeología
emprendimiento
Proceso de mercado
equilibrio
topic economia uniformemente circular
praxeologia
empreendedorismo
processo de mercado
equilíbrio
Evenly Rotating Economy
praxeology
entrepreneurship
Market process
equilibrium
Economía de rotación uniforme
praxeología
emprendimiento
Proceso de mercado
equilibrio
description Neoclassic economic theory regards equilibrium, whether general or partial, as a crucially important foundation of the dismal science[1]. In the view of mainstream economists, the general equilibrium framework not only an investigation of the economy in terms of its perfect qualities, but also is suitable as an end or goal of action. The Austrian school, in contrast, sees equilibrium (or the evenly rotating economy - ERE) merely as a tendency for economic activities to move us in that direction, but it is never attained. Praxeological economics has thus concentrated not on equilibrium, but on the process by which the market moves toward it. Since the process of shifting resources to meet these ends cannot be achieved spontaneously, entrepreneurship plays a key role. In Mises and Rothbard’s view, entrepreneurship involves uncertainty bearing which beyond the alertness emphasized by Hayek and Kirzner; on the other hand, unlike Lachmann looks the economy as a kaleidoscope and rejects the ERE, Mises and Rothbard regard the ERE as an indispensable way to understand the economy.   [1] As Frank H. Hahn said “Whatever economics is used or thought about, equilibrium is a central organizing concept.” (Hahn 1984: 43). Many economists and philosophers of science consider mathematical neoclassical general equilibrium theory as one of the peak achievements of economics (Rosenberg, 1992). Tieben (2012) stated that policy-makers and theorists of all schools of economics all use some form of equilibrium theory to develop their ideas and support their main theoretical and political claims. Lawson (2005) indicated that the equilibrium concept is a major cause of controversy between different schools of economic thought. A.W. Bob Coats even deems it the case that “economics has been dominated throughout its history by a single paradigm – the theory of economic equilibrium via the market mechanism.” (Coats 1969: 292).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1395
10.30800/mises.2021.v9.1395
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1395
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2021.v9.1395
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1395/709
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Yearly Continuous Publication
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 9 (2021): Publicación Anual Continua
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 9 (2021): Publicação Contínua
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313179706556416