Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Long, Roderick T.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mises
Texto Completo: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769
Resumo: Long examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view.
id IMB-1_ab52a0d8349d9be6781110c2ecacfd70
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/769
network_acronym_str IMB-1
network_name_str Mises
repository_id_str
spelling Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property RightsCercado de Terras:: Uma Crítica a Kevin Carson sobre os Direitos de PropriedadeDireitos de PropriedadeLockeanosMutualistasGeorgianosProperty RightsLockeansMutualismGeorgiansLong examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view.Long analisa a natureza os direitos de propriedades sob a ótica das exigências impostas pelos direitos residuais da comunidade humana em geral; para os georgianos, a comunidade exerce propriamente um papel ativo, como, por exemplo, no famoso “Imposto Único” sobre o valor da terra, de Henry George, enquanto mutualistas, na tradição de Benjamin Tucker, tendem a ver a terra livre como somente aquelas terras comunais, sem dono, sobre as quais os direitos últimos de propriedade da humanidade são latentes. Long critica a visão de Kevin Carson – sobre as vantagens pragmáticas do mutualismo sobre os rivais georgianos e lockeanos – como filósofo, restringindo a atenção a um problema filosófico relativo aos direitos de propriedade que ele identifica naquele autor. O ponto central da argumentação de Long é que a abordagem lockeana é a única defensável, sob o ponto de vista libertário.Instituto Mises Brasil2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPrinted JournalRevista Impressaapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/76910.30800/mises.2015.v3.769MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015); 345-352MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015); 345-352MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 2 (2015); 345-3522594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769/453Long, Roderick T.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:33Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/769Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:33Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
Cercado de Terras:: Uma Crítica a Kevin Carson sobre os Direitos de Propriedade
title Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
spellingShingle Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
Long, Roderick T.
Direitos de Propriedade
Lockeanos
Mutualistas
Georgianos
Property Rights
Lockeans
Mutualism
Georgians
title_short Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
title_full Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
title_fullStr Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
title_full_unstemmed Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
title_sort Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
author Long, Roderick T.
author_facet Long, Roderick T.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Long, Roderick T.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direitos de Propriedade
Lockeanos
Mutualistas
Georgianos
Property Rights
Lockeans
Mutualism
Georgians
topic Direitos de Propriedade
Lockeanos
Mutualistas
Georgianos
Property Rights
Lockeans
Mutualism
Georgians
description Long examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Printed Journal
Revista Impressa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769
10.30800/mises.2015.v3.769
url https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769
identifier_str_mv 10.30800/mises.2015.v3.769
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769/453
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Mises Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015); 345-352
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015); 345-352
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 2 (2015); 345-352
2594-9187
2318-0811
reponame:Mises
instname:Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron:IMB
instname_str Instituto Mises Brasil
instacron_str IMB
institution IMB
reponame_str Mises
collection Mises
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@mises.org.br
_version_ 1798313181232234496