Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769 |
Resumo: | Long examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view. |
id |
IMB-1_ab52a0d8349d9be6781110c2ecacfd70 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/769 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property RightsCercado de Terras:: Uma Crítica a Kevin Carson sobre os Direitos de PropriedadeDireitos de PropriedadeLockeanosMutualistasGeorgianosProperty RightsLockeansMutualismGeorgiansLong examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view.Long analisa a natureza os direitos de propriedades sob a ótica das exigências impostas pelos direitos residuais da comunidade humana em geral; para os georgianos, a comunidade exerce propriamente um papel ativo, como, por exemplo, no famoso “Imposto Único” sobre o valor da terra, de Henry George, enquanto mutualistas, na tradição de Benjamin Tucker, tendem a ver a terra livre como somente aquelas terras comunais, sem dono, sobre as quais os direitos últimos de propriedade da humanidade são latentes. Long critica a visão de Kevin Carson – sobre as vantagens pragmáticas do mutualismo sobre os rivais georgianos e lockeanos – como filósofo, restringindo a atenção a um problema filosófico relativo aos direitos de propriedade que ele identifica naquele autor. O ponto central da argumentação de Long é que a abordagem lockeana é a única defensável, sob o ponto de vista libertário.Instituto Mises Brasil2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPrinted JournalRevista Impressaapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/76910.30800/mises.2015.v3.769MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015); 345-352MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015); 345-352MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 2 (2015); 345-3522594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769/453Long, Roderick T.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-08T02:31:33Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/769Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:33Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights Cercado de Terras:: Uma Crítica a Kevin Carson sobre os Direitos de Propriedade |
title |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
spellingShingle |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights Long, Roderick T. Direitos de Propriedade Lockeanos Mutualistas Georgianos Property Rights Lockeans Mutualism Georgians |
title_short |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
title_full |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
title_fullStr |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
title_sort |
Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights |
author |
Long, Roderick T. |
author_facet |
Long, Roderick T. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Long, Roderick T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Propriedade Lockeanos Mutualistas Georgianos Property Rights Lockeans Mutualism Georgians |
topic |
Direitos de Propriedade Lockeanos Mutualistas Georgianos Property Rights Lockeans Mutualism Georgians |
description |
Long examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Printed Journal Revista Impressa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769 10.30800/mises.2015.v3.769 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2015.v3.769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769/453 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015); 345-352 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015); 345-352 MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 3 n. 2 (2015); 345-352 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313181232234496 |