A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mises |
Texto Completo: | https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329 |
Resumo: | This paper deals with the debate regarding the sufficiency of Misesian praxeology for the elucidation of economic phenomena and their compatibility with the Hayekian theory of communication and the acquisition of knowledge in specific institutional contexts, as both were developed from the debate of the economic calculation, occurred in the decades of 1920 and 1930. In this sense, the two groups that led the debate were formed, on the one hand, by those who argue that the Austrian School was divided between the Misesian and Hayekian paradigms and, on the other, those who argue that the core of the Austrian distinctive approach is based on both Mises and Hayek. |
id |
IMB-1_f613c55f34bbc281f1405fa2225cf035 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/329 |
network_acronym_str |
IMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Mises |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and HayekUna reflexión sobre la historia reciente de la Escuela Austriaca:: el debate sobre la “deshomogeneización” entre Mises y HayekUma reflexão sobre a história recente da Escola Austríaca:: o debate sobre a desomogeneização entre Mises e HayekMisesHayekDesomogeneizaçãoEscola AustríacaDebateMIsesHayekDehomogenizationDebateAustrian SchoolMisesHayekDeshomogeneizaciónDabeteEscuela AustríacaThis paper deals with the debate regarding the sufficiency of Misesian praxeology for the elucidation of economic phenomena and their compatibility with the Hayekian theory of communication and the acquisition of knowledge in specific institutional contexts, as both were developed from the debate of the economic calculation, occurred in the decades of 1920 and 1930. In this sense, the two groups that led the debate were formed, on the one hand, by those who argue that the Austrian School was divided between the Misesian and Hayekian paradigms and, on the other, those who argue that the core of the Austrian distinctive approach is based on both Mises and Hayek.Este trabajo trata del debate que se refiere a la suficiencia de la praxeología Misesiana para la elucidación de los fenómenos económicos y de su compatibilidad con la teoría Hayekiana sobre la comunicación y la adquisición del conocimiento en contextos institucionales específicos. Ambas fueron desarrolladas a partir del debate del cálculo económico, ocurrido en las décadas de 1920 y 1930. En ese sentido, los dos grupos que protagonizaron el debate fueron formados, por un lado, por los que defienden que la Escuela Austriaca se dividió entre los paradigmas Misesiano y, Hayekiano y, por otro, los que sostienen que el núcleo del enfoque distintivo austriaco se basa tanto en Mises cómo en Hayek.Este trabalho trata do debate que se refere à suficiência da Praxiologia Misesiana para a elucidação dos fenômenos econômicos e de sua compatibilidade com a teoria Hayekiana sobre a comunicação e a aquisição do conhecimento em contextos institucionais específicos. Ambas foram desenvolvidas a partir do debate do cálculo econômico, ocorrido nas décadas de 1920 e 1930. Nesse sentido, os dois grupos que protagonizaram o debate foram formados, de um lado, pelos que defendem que a Escola Austríaca se dividiu entre os paradigmas Misesiano e Hayekiano e, de outro, os que defendem que o núcleo da abordagem distintiva Austríaca se baseia tanto em Mises quanto em Hayek.Instituto Mises Brasil2018-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/32910.30800/mises.2018.v6.329MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (May-Aug)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (mayo-ago)MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 6 n. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (maio-ago)2594-91872318-0811reponame:Misesinstname:Instituto Mises Brasilinstacron:IMBporhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329/577Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Hora Andrade IIIinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade III, Paulo Hora2019-06-08T02:31:05Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/329Revistahttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournalPRIhttps://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/oairevista@mises.org.br2594-91872318-0811opendoar:2019-06-08T02:31:05Mises - Instituto Mises Brasilfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek Una reflexión sobre la historia reciente de la Escuela Austriaca:: el debate sobre la “deshomogeneización” entre Mises y Hayek Uma reflexão sobre a história recente da Escola Austríaca:: o debate sobre a desomogeneização entre Mises e Hayek |
title |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
spellingShingle |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek Andrade III, Paulo Hora Mises Hayek Desomogeneização Escola Austríaca Debate MIses Hayek Dehomogenization Debate Austrian School Mises Hayek Deshomogeneización Dabete Escuela Austríaca |
title_short |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
title_full |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
title_fullStr |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
title_full_unstemmed |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
title_sort |
A consideration on the recent history of the Austrian School:: the debate on the dehomogenization between Mises and Hayek |
author |
Andrade III, Paulo Hora |
author_facet |
Andrade III, Paulo Hora |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade III, Paulo Hora |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mises Hayek Desomogeneização Escola Austríaca Debate MIses Hayek Dehomogenization Debate Austrian School Mises Hayek Deshomogeneización Dabete Escuela Austríaca |
topic |
Mises Hayek Desomogeneização Escola Austríaca Debate MIses Hayek Dehomogenization Debate Austrian School Mises Hayek Deshomogeneización Dabete Escuela Austríaca |
description |
This paper deals with the debate regarding the sufficiency of Misesian praxeology for the elucidation of economic phenomena and their compatibility with the Hayekian theory of communication and the acquisition of knowledge in specific institutional contexts, as both were developed from the debate of the economic calculation, occurred in the decades of 1920 and 1930. In this sense, the two groups that led the debate were formed, on the one hand, by those who argue that the Austrian School was divided between the Misesian and Hayekian paradigms and, on the other, those who argue that the core of the Austrian distinctive approach is based on both Mises and Hayek. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329 10.30800/mises.2018.v6.329 |
url |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30800/mises.2018.v6.329 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329/577 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Hora Andrade III info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Hora Andrade III |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (May-Aug) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (mayo-ago) MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics; v. 6 n. 2 (2018): MISES Journal 2018 (maio-ago) 2594-9187 2318-0811 reponame:Mises instname:Instituto Mises Brasil instacron:IMB |
instname_str |
Instituto Mises Brasil |
instacron_str |
IMB |
institution |
IMB |
reponame_str |
Mises |
collection |
Mises |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mises - Instituto Mises Brasil |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@mises.org.br |
_version_ |
1798313180398616576 |