Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pialarissi, Carmen Silvia de Melo
Data de Publicação: 1987
Outros Autores: Vaz, Adelaide José, Souza, Ana Maria Carvalho de, Nakamura, Paulo Mutuko, Camargo, Eide Dias, Silva, Marcos Vinícius da, Ueda, Mirthes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545
Resumo: Four immunological techniques were evaluated for the detection of antibodies to Cysticercus cellulosae in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): complement fixation test (CF), passive haem-magglutination test (PHA), indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-hundred twenty-five CSF from patients with confirmed neurocysticercosis and 94 CSF from a control group (60 from patients suffering from neurological disorders other than neurocysticercosis and 34 from presumably healthy individuals) were assayed. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were determined, which were, 48.0% and 90.4% for CF; 88 8% and 96.8% for FHA; 87.2% and 98.9% for IF, and 97.6% and 98.9% for ELISA, respectively. There were significative differences among the tests and these allowed to conclude that the best immunodiagnostic test for neurocysticercosis was ELISA, followed by PHA and IF tests.
id IMT-1_35ebdec488d5ea9e065f83595896f282
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/28545
network_acronym_str IMT-1
network_name_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis Estudo comparativo de testes sorológicos no diagnóstico imunológico da neurocisticercose NeurocisticercoseLíquido cefalorraquianoImunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose Four immunological techniques were evaluated for the detection of antibodies to Cysticercus cellulosae in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): complement fixation test (CF), passive haem-magglutination test (PHA), indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-hundred twenty-five CSF from patients with confirmed neurocysticercosis and 94 CSF from a control group (60 from patients suffering from neurological disorders other than neurocysticercosis and 34 from presumably healthy individuals) were assayed. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were determined, which were, 48.0% and 90.4% for CF; 88 8% and 96.8% for FHA; 87.2% and 98.9% for IF, and 97.6% and 98.9% for ELISA, respectively. There were significative differences among the tests and these allowed to conclude that the best immunodiagnostic test for neurocysticercosis was ELISA, followed by PHA and IF tests. Estudamos comparativamente quatro técnicas imunológicas para o diagnóstico da neurocisticercose (NC) utilizando líquido cefalorraquiano (LCR) como espécime clínico: as reações de fixação de complemento (RFC), hemaglutinação passiva (RHA), imunofluorescência indireta (RIF) e teste imunoenzimático ELISA Foram ensaiadas 125 amostras de LCR de pacientes com NC comprovada e 94 amostras de LCR do grupo controle (60 de pacientes com quadros clínicos neurológicos diversos e 34 de pacientes supostamente normais). Os índices de sensibilidade e especificidade obtidos para os testes foram, respectivamente, de 48,0% e 90,4% para a RFC; 88,8% e 96,8% para a RHA; 87,2 e 98,9% para a RIF e 97,6% e 98,9% para o teste ELISA. A diferença significativa (p < 0,05) observada entre os testes permite concluir que o melhor teste para o diagnóstico de NC foi o teste ELISA seguido das reações de HA e IF. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo1987-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 29 No. 6 (1987); 367-373 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 29 Núm. 6 (1987); 367-373 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 29 n. 6 (1987); 367-373 1678-99460036-4665reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinstname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)instacron:IMTporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545/30398Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPialarissi, Carmen Silvia de MeloVaz, Adelaide JoséSouza, Ana Maria Carvalho deNakamura, Paulo MutukoCamargo, Eide DiasSilva, Marcos Vinícius daUeda, Mirthes2012-07-02T00:59:44Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/28545Revistahttp://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/oai||revimtsp@usp.br1678-99460036-4665opendoar:2022-12-13T16:50:16.762659Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
Estudo comparativo de testes sorológicos no diagnóstico imunológico da neurocisticercose
title Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
spellingShingle Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
Pialarissi, Carmen Silvia de Melo
Neurocisticercose
Líquido cefalorraquiano
Imunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose
title_short Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
title_full Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
title_fullStr Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
title_sort Comparative study of serological tests in immunological diagnosis for neurocysticercosis
author Pialarissi, Carmen Silvia de Melo
author_facet Pialarissi, Carmen Silvia de Melo
Vaz, Adelaide José
Souza, Ana Maria Carvalho de
Nakamura, Paulo Mutuko
Camargo, Eide Dias
Silva, Marcos Vinícius da
Ueda, Mirthes
author_role author
author2 Vaz, Adelaide José
Souza, Ana Maria Carvalho de
Nakamura, Paulo Mutuko
Camargo, Eide Dias
Silva, Marcos Vinícius da
Ueda, Mirthes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pialarissi, Carmen Silvia de Melo
Vaz, Adelaide José
Souza, Ana Maria Carvalho de
Nakamura, Paulo Mutuko
Camargo, Eide Dias
Silva, Marcos Vinícius da
Ueda, Mirthes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neurocisticercose
Líquido cefalorraquiano
Imunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose
topic Neurocisticercose
Líquido cefalorraquiano
Imunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose
description Four immunological techniques were evaluated for the detection of antibodies to Cysticercus cellulosae in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): complement fixation test (CF), passive haem-magglutination test (PHA), indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-hundred twenty-five CSF from patients with confirmed neurocysticercosis and 94 CSF from a control group (60 from patients suffering from neurological disorders other than neurocysticercosis and 34 from presumably healthy individuals) were assayed. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were determined, which were, 48.0% and 90.4% for CF; 88 8% and 96.8% for FHA; 87.2% and 98.9% for IF, and 97.6% and 98.9% for ELISA, respectively. There were significative differences among the tests and these allowed to conclude that the best immunodiagnostic test for neurocysticercosis was ELISA, followed by PHA and IF tests.
publishDate 1987
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1987-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/28545/30398
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 29 No. 6 (1987); 367-373
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; Vol. 29 Núm. 6 (1987); 367-373
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo; v. 29 n. 6 (1987); 367-373
1678-9946
0036-4665
reponame:Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
instname:Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron:IMT
instname_str Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
instacron_str IMT
institution IMT
reponame_str Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
collection Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo - Instituto de Medicina Tropical (IMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revimtsp@usp.br
_version_ 1798951637245493248