Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palhares, Rodrigo Resende
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Britto, Glauco do Canto, Su, Yun, Le Berre, Marie-Aude, Henriques, Ricardo Saad, Navachi, Fabricio Volpato, Pereira, Daniela Cristina Foli, Ostojic, Helene, Azevedo, Graziella Agostini, Van Cutsem, Eric
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727
Resumo: Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common and when metastatic, it has a five-year survival rate of 14%. Regorafenib is an approved TKI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a proven increase in overall survival (OS). Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety results of regorafenib in patients with mCRC and good prognostic characteristics (GPC). Method: Subgroup analysis of the CORRECT study, with participants divided according to GPC, following the criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0, duration of metastatic disease greater than 18 months, up to three metastatic sites and absence of liver metastasis. Efficacy compared with stratified log-rank test and hazard ratios (HR) calculated with the Cox model. Results: Of the 760 participants randomized, 292 (34.5%) had GPC; 185 (63.4%) received regorafenib; and 107 (35.6%) received placebo. For the GPC group, the median OS was 10.9 months (95%CI:8.8-12.3) for regorafenib and 7.3 months (95%CI:5.6-9.1) for placebo, with 39% of reduction of the risk of death (HR 0.61; 95% CI:0.43-0.88; p=0.0069). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95%CI:3.0-3.9) versus 1.8 months (95%CI:1.7-1.8) respectively, with 61% of reduced risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.39; 95%CI:0.30-0.52; p<0.0001). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent for regorafenib. After setting baseline for quality of life scores (EQ-5D), these declined less for regorafenib compared to placebo (0.687 versus 0.592) with a significant difference of 0.09. Conclusion: GPC patients who received regorafenib improved OS and PFS with less deterioration of quality-of-life compared to placebo.
id INCA-1_3f19fddcbbb6e4ed077dc0f6341992a0
oai_identifier_str oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/2727
network_acronym_str INCA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT StudyEficacia y Seguridad de Regorafenib en Pacientes con Características de Buen Pronóstico en Tratamiento del Cáncer Colorrectal Metastásico: Análisis de Subgrupo del Estudio CORRECTEficácia e Segurança de Regorafenibe em Pacientes com Características de Bom Prognóstico no Tratamento do Câncer Colorretal Metastático: Análise de Subgrupo do Estudo CORRECTinibidores de proteínas quinasesneoplasias colorretaismetástase neoplásicaanálise de sobrevidaprotein kinase inhibitorscolorectal neoplasmsneoplasm metastasissurvival analysisinhibidores de proteínas quinasasneoplasias colorrectalesmetástasis de la neoplasiaanálisis de supervivênciaIntroduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common and when metastatic, it has a five-year survival rate of 14%. Regorafenib is an approved TKI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a proven increase in overall survival (OS). Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety results of regorafenib in patients with mCRC and good prognostic characteristics (GPC). Method: Subgroup analysis of the CORRECT study, with participants divided according to GPC, following the criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0, duration of metastatic disease greater than 18 months, up to three metastatic sites and absence of liver metastasis. Efficacy compared with stratified log-rank test and hazard ratios (HR) calculated with the Cox model. Results: Of the 760 participants randomized, 292 (34.5%) had GPC; 185 (63.4%) received regorafenib; and 107 (35.6%) received placebo. For the GPC group, the median OS was 10.9 months (95%CI:8.8-12.3) for regorafenib and 7.3 months (95%CI:5.6-9.1) for placebo, with 39% of reduction of the risk of death (HR 0.61; 95% CI:0.43-0.88; p=0.0069). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95%CI:3.0-3.9) versus 1.8 months (95%CI:1.7-1.8) respectively, with 61% of reduced risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.39; 95%CI:0.30-0.52; p<0.0001). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent for regorafenib. After setting baseline for quality of life scores (EQ-5D), these declined less for regorafenib compared to placebo (0.687 versus 0.592) with a significant difference of 0.09. Conclusion: GPC patients who received regorafenib improved OS and PFS with less deterioration of quality-of-life compared to placebo.Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es el segundo más frecuente y cuando presenta metástasis tiene una supervivencia a los cinco años del 14%. Regorafenib es un inhibidor de la tirosina quinasa (ITQ) aprobado para CCR metastásico (CCRm) con un aumento comprobado en la supervivencia general (SG). Objetivo: Explorar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de regorafenib en pacientes con CCRm y características de buen pronóstico (CBP). Método: Análisis de subgrupos del estudio CORRECT, con participantes divididos según CBP, siguiendo los criterios: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0, duración de la enfermedad metastásica mayor a 18 meses, hasta tres sitios metastásicos y ausencia de metastasis hepatica. Eficacia comparada con la prueba de log-rank estratificada y hazad ratios (HR) calculados con el modelo de Cox. Resultados: De los 760 participantes aleatorios, 292 (34,5%) tenían CBP; 185 (63,4%) recibieron regorafenib; 107 (35,6%) recibieron placebo. Para el grupo de CBP, la mediana de SG fue de 10,9 meses (IC95%:8,8-12,3) para regorafenib y de 7,3 meses (IC95%:5,6-9,1) para placebo, con una reducción del riesgo de muerte del 39% (HR 0,61; IC95%:0,43-0,88; p=0,0069). La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión (PFS) fue de 3,5 meses (IC95%:3,0-3,9) frente a 1,8 meses (IC95%:1,7-1,8) respectivamente, con un 61% de riesgo reducido de progresión de la enfermedad o muerte (HR 0,39; IC95%:0,30-0,52; p<0,0001). Los eventos adversos de grado 3 y 4 fueron más frecuentes con regorafenib. Después de establecer la línea de base para las puntuaciones de calidad de vida (EQ-5D), estas disminuyeron menos con regorafenib en comparación con placebo (0,687 frente a 0,592) con una diferencia significativa de 0,09. Conclusión: Los pacientes con CBP que recibieron regorafenib mejoraron la SG y la SLP con un menor deterioro en la calidad de vida en comparación con el placebo.Introdução: O câncer colorretal (CCR) é o segundo mais incidente e, quando metastático, apresenta taxa de sobrevida de 14% em cinco anos. Regorafenibe é um inibidor de tirosina-quinase (ITQ) aprovado para CCR metastático (CCRm) com aumento comprovado de sobrevida global (SG). Objetivo: Explorar resultados de eficácia e segurança de regorafenibe em pacientes com CCRm e características de bom prognóstico (CBP). Método: Análise de subgrupo do estudo CORRECT, com participantes divididos de acordo com CBP, seguindo os critérios: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0, tempo de doença metastática maior que 18 meses, até três sítios metastáticos e ausência de metástase hepática. Eficácia comparada com teste de log-rank estratificado e hazad ratios (HR) calculados com o modelo de Cox. Resultados: Dos 760 participantes randomizados, 292 (34,5%) apresentavam CBP; 185 (63,4%) receberam regorafenibe; 107 (35,6%), placebo. Para o grupo CBP, a mediana SG foi 10,9 meses (IC95%:8,8-12,3) para regorafenibe e 7,3 meses (IC95%:5,6-9,1) para placebo, com 39% de redução no risco de morte (HR 0,61; IC95%:0,43-0,88; p=0,0069). A mediana de sobrevida livre de progressão (SLP) foi de 3,5 meses (IC95%:3,0-3,9) versus 1,8 mês (IC95%:1,7-1,8) respectivamente, com 61% de redução no risco de progressão da doença ou morte (HR 0,39; IC95%:0,30-0,52; p<0,0001). Os eventos adversos graus 3 e 4 foram mais frequentes para regorafenibe. Após definição de valor basal para escores de qualidade de vida (EQ-5D), estes decaíram menos para regorafenibe comparados com placebo (0,687 versus 0,592) com diferença significativa de 0,09. Conclusão: Pacientes com CBP que receberam regorafenibe melhoraram SG e SLP com menor deterioração da qualidade de vida comparado com placebo.INCA2022-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos, Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/272710.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n4.2727Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2022): Oct./Nov./Dec.; e-162727Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2022): oct./nov./dic.; e-162727Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 68 n. 4 (2022): out./nov./dez.; e-1627272176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporenghttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/2433https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/3105https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/2462Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPalhares, Rodrigo ResendeBritto, Glauco do CantoSu, YunLe Berre, Marie-AudeHenriques, Ricardo SaadNavachi, Fabricio VolpatoPereira, Daniela Cristina FoliOstojic, HeleneAzevedo, Graziella AgostiniVan Cutsem, Eric2023-08-10T19:07:39Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/2727Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2023-08-10T19:07:39Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
Eficacia y Seguridad de Regorafenib en Pacientes con Características de Buen Pronóstico en Tratamiento del Cáncer Colorrectal Metastásico: Análisis de Subgrupo del Estudio CORRECT
Eficácia e Segurança de Regorafenibe em Pacientes com Características de Bom Prognóstico no Tratamento do Câncer Colorretal Metastático: Análise de Subgrupo do Estudo CORRECT
title Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
spellingShingle Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
Palhares, Rodrigo Resende
inibidores de proteínas quinases
neoplasias colorretais
metástase neoplásica
análise de sobrevida
protein kinase inhibitors
colorectal neoplasms
neoplasm metastasis
survival analysis
inhibidores de proteínas quinasas
neoplasias colorrectales
metástasis de la neoplasia
análisis de supervivência
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
title_sort Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Patients with Characteristics of Good Prognosis in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CORRECT Study
author Palhares, Rodrigo Resende
author_facet Palhares, Rodrigo Resende
Britto, Glauco do Canto
Su, Yun
Le Berre, Marie-Aude
Henriques, Ricardo Saad
Navachi, Fabricio Volpato
Pereira, Daniela Cristina Foli
Ostojic, Helene
Azevedo, Graziella Agostini
Van Cutsem, Eric
author_role author
author2 Britto, Glauco do Canto
Su, Yun
Le Berre, Marie-Aude
Henriques, Ricardo Saad
Navachi, Fabricio Volpato
Pereira, Daniela Cristina Foli
Ostojic, Helene
Azevedo, Graziella Agostini
Van Cutsem, Eric
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palhares, Rodrigo Resende
Britto, Glauco do Canto
Su, Yun
Le Berre, Marie-Aude
Henriques, Ricardo Saad
Navachi, Fabricio Volpato
Pereira, Daniela Cristina Foli
Ostojic, Helene
Azevedo, Graziella Agostini
Van Cutsem, Eric
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv inibidores de proteínas quinases
neoplasias colorretais
metástase neoplásica
análise de sobrevida
protein kinase inhibitors
colorectal neoplasms
neoplasm metastasis
survival analysis
inhibidores de proteínas quinasas
neoplasias colorrectales
metástasis de la neoplasia
análisis de supervivência
topic inibidores de proteínas quinases
neoplasias colorretais
metástase neoplásica
análise de sobrevida
protein kinase inhibitors
colorectal neoplasms
neoplasm metastasis
survival analysis
inhibidores de proteínas quinasas
neoplasias colorrectales
metástasis de la neoplasia
análisis de supervivência
description Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common and when metastatic, it has a five-year survival rate of 14%. Regorafenib is an approved TKI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a proven increase in overall survival (OS). Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety results of regorafenib in patients with mCRC and good prognostic characteristics (GPC). Method: Subgroup analysis of the CORRECT study, with participants divided according to GPC, following the criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0, duration of metastatic disease greater than 18 months, up to three metastatic sites and absence of liver metastasis. Efficacy compared with stratified log-rank test and hazard ratios (HR) calculated with the Cox model. Results: Of the 760 participants randomized, 292 (34.5%) had GPC; 185 (63.4%) received regorafenib; and 107 (35.6%) received placebo. For the GPC group, the median OS was 10.9 months (95%CI:8.8-12.3) for regorafenib and 7.3 months (95%CI:5.6-9.1) for placebo, with 39% of reduction of the risk of death (HR 0.61; 95% CI:0.43-0.88; p=0.0069). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95%CI:3.0-3.9) versus 1.8 months (95%CI:1.7-1.8) respectively, with 61% of reduced risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.39; 95%CI:0.30-0.52; p<0.0001). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent for regorafenib. After setting baseline for quality of life scores (EQ-5D), these declined less for regorafenib compared to placebo (0.687 versus 0.592) with a significant difference of 0.09. Conclusion: GPC patients who received regorafenib improved OS and PFS with less deterioration of quality-of-life compared to placebo.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigos, Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n4.2727
url https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727
identifier_str_mv 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n4.2727
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/2433
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/3105
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2727/2462
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 68 No. 4 (2022): Oct./Nov./Dec.; e-162727
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 68 Núm. 4 (2022): oct./nov./dic.; e-162727
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 68 n. 4 (2022): out./nov./dez.; e-162727
2176-9745
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron:INCA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron_str INCA
institution INCA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbc@inca.gov.br
_version_ 1797042232838062080