Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1970 |
Resumo: | This study focuses on the theme of conflict among the three underlying moral and political principles in the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS), from the perspective of the bioethics of protection: the right to equality and comprehensiveness in health care, as well as universal access. We include this theme in the sphere of Public Health Bioethics, reviewing several previous studies on this issue with the aim of reflecting on whether the principles of the SUS are mutually consistent in their logic and compatible in practice, or on the contrary, whether they are logically contradictory and mutually exclusive. We consider this discussion relevant in light of the apparently increasing agreement in both the bioethical and health fields concerning the prima facie incompatibility between the guarantee of universal coverage on the one hand and comprehensive, equal access to services on the other, considering the reality of scarce resources, a problem that affects practically all health systems in the world, as by minor official funds as by major public demands. We thus approach what is considered the most controversial specific problem in so-called public bioethics, i.e., resource allocation in which public health guidelines determine that scarce resources should meet numerous and varied health demands at both the collective and individual levels. |
id |
INCA-1_da5e4bc4e3c5fc350c389e0e0b636e84 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/1970 |
network_acronym_str |
INCA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protectionBioética do Sistema Único de Saúde/SUS: uma análise pela bioética da proteçãoBioéticaSaúde públicaVigilância sanitáriaRecursos em saúdeJustiça socialEqüidadeBioethicsPublic healthHealth surveillanceHealth resourcesSocial justiceEquityThis study focuses on the theme of conflict among the three underlying moral and political principles in the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS), from the perspective of the bioethics of protection: the right to equality and comprehensiveness in health care, as well as universal access. We include this theme in the sphere of Public Health Bioethics, reviewing several previous studies on this issue with the aim of reflecting on whether the principles of the SUS are mutually consistent in their logic and compatible in practice, or on the contrary, whether they are logically contradictory and mutually exclusive. We consider this discussion relevant in light of the apparently increasing agreement in both the bioethical and health fields concerning the prima facie incompatibility between the guarantee of universal coverage on the one hand and comprehensive, equal access to services on the other, considering the reality of scarce resources, a problem that affects practically all health systems in the world, as by minor official funds as by major public demands. We thus approach what is considered the most controversial specific problem in so-called public bioethics, i.e., resource allocation in which public health guidelines determine that scarce resources should meet numerous and varied health demands at both the collective and individual levels.Neste trabalho, abordamos, do ponto de vista da bioética da proteção, o tema do conflito entre os três princípios morais e políticos norteadores do Sistema Único de Saúde brasileiro (SUS): direito à igualdade e à integralidade na assistência à saúde e universalidade do acesso. Inscrevemos tal tema no âmbito da Bioética da Saúde Pública, realizando a revisão de alguns estudos já realizados sobre esta problemática com o intento de refletir se os princípios do SUS são logicamente consistentes e praticamente compatíveis entre si, ou se, ao contrário, são logicamente contraditórios e praticamente excludentes. Consideramos tal discussão pertinente visto que parece cada vez mais consenso, tanto em âmbito bioético como em âmbito sanitário, que a garantia da cobertura ao mesmo tempo universal e integral é problemática quando os dois tipos de exigência se situam na realidade da escassez de recursos; problema, este, que preocupa praticamente todos os sistemas de saúde do mundo. Assim, abordamos, em particular, um problema específico, considerado o mais polêmico da chamada bioética pública: a alocação de recursos, na qual as diretrizes norteadoras das políticas de saúde definem que os recursos, considerados, por um lado, escassos, devem, por outro lado, atender a inúmeras e variadas demandas tanto de caráter social como individual.INCA2005-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos, Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/197010.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2005v51n2.1970Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 51 No. 2 (2005): Apr/May/June; 117-123Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2005): abr./mayo/jun.; 117-123Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 51 n. 2 (2005): abr./maio/jun.; 117-1232176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1970/1198Arreguy, Euclydes Etienne M.Schramm, Fermin R.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-29T20:30:34Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/1970Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2021-11-29T20:30:34Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection Bioética do Sistema Único de Saúde/SUS: uma análise pela bioética da proteção |
title |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection Arreguy, Euclydes Etienne M. Bioética Saúde pública Vigilância sanitária Recursos em saúde Justiça social Eqüidade Bioethics Public health Health surveillance Health resources Social justice Equity |
title_short |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
title_full |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
title_sort |
Brazilian Public Health System: an analysis through the bioethics of protection |
author |
Arreguy, Euclydes Etienne M. |
author_facet |
Arreguy, Euclydes Etienne M. Schramm, Fermin R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schramm, Fermin R. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arreguy, Euclydes Etienne M. Schramm, Fermin R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioética Saúde pública Vigilância sanitária Recursos em saúde Justiça social Eqüidade Bioethics Public health Health surveillance Health resources Social justice Equity |
topic |
Bioética Saúde pública Vigilância sanitária Recursos em saúde Justiça social Eqüidade Bioethics Public health Health surveillance Health resources Social justice Equity |
description |
This study focuses on the theme of conflict among the three underlying moral and political principles in the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS), from the perspective of the bioethics of protection: the right to equality and comprehensiveness in health care, as well as universal access. We include this theme in the sphere of Public Health Bioethics, reviewing several previous studies on this issue with the aim of reflecting on whether the principles of the SUS are mutually consistent in their logic and compatible in practice, or on the contrary, whether they are logically contradictory and mutually exclusive. We consider this discussion relevant in light of the apparently increasing agreement in both the bioethical and health fields concerning the prima facie incompatibility between the guarantee of universal coverage on the one hand and comprehensive, equal access to services on the other, considering the reality of scarce resources, a problem that affects practically all health systems in the world, as by minor official funds as by major public demands. We thus approach what is considered the most controversial specific problem in so-called public bioethics, i.e., resource allocation in which public health guidelines determine that scarce resources should meet numerous and varied health demands at both the collective and individual levels. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigos, Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1970 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2005v51n2.1970 |
url |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1970 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2005v51n2.1970 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1970/1198 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INCA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
INCA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 51 No. 2 (2005): Apr/May/June; 117-123 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2005): abr./mayo/jun.; 117-123 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 51 n. 2 (2005): abr./maio/jun.; 117-123 2176-9745 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) instacron:INCA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) |
instacron_str |
INCA |
institution |
INCA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbc@inca.gov.br |
_version_ |
1797042248881274880 |