PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza Monteiro, Marco Antônio
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Isagoge (Niterói)
Texto Completo: https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/141
Resumo: This paper aimed to analyze and contrast the concept of judicial activism with the ideas of procedural truth and discretion based on Luigi Ferrajoli’s guaranteeism. To this end, a small study of the main elements of guaranteeism was carried out, followed by an examination of procedural truth and its relationship with discretion. In the last part, a critical conceptualization of judicial activism and neoconstitutionalism was carried out, using guaranteeism as an argumentative basis. So it was possible to identify a latent incompatibility between judicial activism and procedural truth, in addition to the perception that the guarantistic discretion is far less harmful to law than the subjectivity of principlist constitutionalism.
id INDEP-4_a737cb5dd87afb96a14b9cb65a2a49f7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/141
network_acronym_str INDEP-4
network_name_str Isagoge (Niterói)
repository_id_str
spelling PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVEVERDAD PROCESAL, DISCRECIONALIDAD Y ACTIVISMO JUDICIAL DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE LUIGI FERRAJOLI VERDADE PROCESSUAL, DISCRICIONARIEDADE E ATIVISMO JUDICIAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA GARANTISTA DE LUIGI FERRAJOLI Judicial ActivismGuaranteeismNeoconstitutionalismPrinciplesDiscretionFerrajoliAtivismo JudicialGarantismoNeoconstitucionalismoPrincípiosDiscricionariedadeFerrajoliactivismo judicialgarantíasFerrajolineoconstitucionalismoprincipiosThis paper aimed to analyze and contrast the concept of judicial activism with the ideas of procedural truth and discretion based on Luigi Ferrajoli’s guaranteeism. To this end, a small study of the main elements of guaranteeism was carried out, followed by an examination of procedural truth and its relationship with discretion. In the last part, a critical conceptualization of judicial activism and neoconstitutionalism was carried out, using guaranteeism as an argumentative basis. So it was possible to identify a latent incompatibility between judicial activism and procedural truth, in addition to the perception that the guarantistic discretion is far less harmful to law than the subjectivity of principlist constitutionalism.Este artículo pretende analizar y contrastar el concepto de activismo judicial con las ideas de verdad procesal y discrecionalidad a partir del garantismo de Luigi Ferrajoli. Para ello, se realizó un breve estudio de los principales elementos del garantismo, seguido del examen de la verdad procesal y su relación con la discrecionalidad. En la última parte, se hizo una conceptualización crítica del activismo judicial y del neoconstitucionalismo, utilizando el garantismo como base argumentativa. Luego se identificó una incompatibilidad latente entre activismo judicial y verdad procesal, además de la percepción de que la discrecionalidad del garantismo es mucho menos lesiva al derecho que la subjetividad del constitucionalismo principialista.Este artigo pretendeu analisar e contrapor o conceito de ativismo judicial com as ideias de verdade processual e discricionariedade baseadas no garantismo de Luigi Ferrajoli. Para tanto, foi realizado um pequeno estudo dos principais elementos do garantismo, seguido pelo exame da verdade processual e sua relação com a discricionariedade. Na última parte, fez-se uma conceituação crítica do ativismo judicial e do neoconstitucionalismo, utilizando-se o garantismo como base argumentativa. Então foi identificada uma latente incompatibilidade entre ativismo judicial e verdade processual, além da percepção que a discricionariedade do garantismo é bem menos nociva ao direito do que a subjetividade do constitucionalismo principialista.Sergio Salles2023-03-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/14110.59079/isagoge.v3i1.141Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023); 16-28Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2023); 16-28Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; v. 3 n. 1 (2023); 16-282763-7123reponame:Isagoge (Niterói)instname:Publicação independenteinstacron:INDEPporhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/141/109Copyright (c) 2023 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza Monteiro, Marco Antônio2023-03-12T21:23:21Zoai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/141Revistahttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isaPRIhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/oaitelos@telosjournals.com2763-71232763-7123opendoar:2023-03-12T21:23:21Isagoge (Niterói) - Publicação independentefalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
VERDAD PROCESAL, DISCRECIONALIDAD Y ACTIVISMO JUDICIAL DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE LUIGI FERRAJOLI
VERDADE PROCESSUAL, DISCRICIONARIEDADE E ATIVISMO JUDICIAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA GARANTISTA DE LUIGI FERRAJOLI
title PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
spellingShingle PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
Souza Monteiro, Marco Antônio
Judicial Activism
Guaranteeism
Neoconstitutionalism
Principles
Discretion
Ferrajoli
Ativismo Judicial
Garantismo
Neoconstitucionalismo
Princípios
Discricionariedade
Ferrajoli
activismo judicial
garantías
Ferrajoli
neoconstitucionalismo
principios
title_short PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
title_full PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
title_sort PROCEDURAL TRUTH, DISCRETION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM UNDER LUIGI FERRAJOLI’S GUARANTISTIC PERSPECTIVE
author Souza Monteiro, Marco Antônio
author_facet Souza Monteiro, Marco Antônio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza Monteiro, Marco Antônio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial Activism
Guaranteeism
Neoconstitutionalism
Principles
Discretion
Ferrajoli
Ativismo Judicial
Garantismo
Neoconstitucionalismo
Princípios
Discricionariedade
Ferrajoli
activismo judicial
garantías
Ferrajoli
neoconstitucionalismo
principios
topic Judicial Activism
Guaranteeism
Neoconstitutionalism
Principles
Discretion
Ferrajoli
Ativismo Judicial
Garantismo
Neoconstitucionalismo
Princípios
Discricionariedade
Ferrajoli
activismo judicial
garantías
Ferrajoli
neoconstitucionalismo
principios
description This paper aimed to analyze and contrast the concept of judicial activism with the ideas of procedural truth and discretion based on Luigi Ferrajoli’s guaranteeism. To this end, a small study of the main elements of guaranteeism was carried out, followed by an examination of procedural truth and its relationship with discretion. In the last part, a critical conceptualization of judicial activism and neoconstitutionalism was carried out, using guaranteeism as an argumentative basis. So it was possible to identify a latent incompatibility between judicial activism and procedural truth, in addition to the perception that the guarantistic discretion is far less harmful to law than the subjectivity of principlist constitutionalism.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/141
10.59079/isagoge.v3i1.141
url https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/141
identifier_str_mv 10.59079/isagoge.v3i1.141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/141/109
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023); 16-28
Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2023); 16-28
Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; v. 3 n. 1 (2023); 16-28
2763-7123
reponame:Isagoge (Niterói)
instname:Publicação independente
instacron:INDEP
instname_str Publicação independente
instacron_str INDEP
institution INDEP
reponame_str Isagoge (Niterói)
collection Isagoge (Niterói)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Isagoge (Niterói) - Publicação independente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv telos@telosjournals.com
_version_ 1797042137866436608

Registros relacionados