Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Diogo F., López-Baucells, Adrià, Farneda, Fábio Z., Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito, Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel, Meyer, Christoph F.J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031
Resumo: Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.
id INPA-2_b2ce1621436263fd427e8ab99c68a02f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/13031
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Rocha, RicardoFerreira, Diogo F.López-Baucells, AdriàFarneda, Fábio Z.Carreiras, João Manuel de BritoPalmeirim, Jorge ManuelMeyer, Christoph F.J.2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1303110.1111/btp.12474Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.Volume 49, Número 6, Pags. 881-890Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbundanceBatBehavioral ResponseBioenergeticsConservation PlanningEdge EffectHabitat FragmentationHabitat UseIntraspecific VariationMatrixNeotropical RegionSeasonalitySecondary ForestSex RatioSex-related DifferenceSpatial AnalysisAmazon RiverCarollia PerspicillataRhinophylla PumilioVertebrataDoes sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical batsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiotropicaengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf627014https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13031/1/artigo-inpa.pdf4b17cda75266e477549dfd2121d766e5MD511/130312020-07-14 09:06:35.497oai:repositorio:1/13031Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T13:06:35Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
spellingShingle Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
Rocha, Ricardo
Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
title_short Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_full Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_fullStr Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_full_unstemmed Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_sort Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
author Rocha, Ricardo
author_facet Rocha, Ricardo
Ferreira, Diogo F.
López-Baucells, Adrià
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito
Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel
Meyer, Christoph F.J.
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Diogo F.
López-Baucells, Adrià
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito
Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel
Meyer, Christoph F.J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Ricardo
Ferreira, Diogo F.
López-Baucells, Adrià
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito
Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel
Meyer, Christoph F.J.
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
topic Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
description Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12474
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031
identifier_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12474
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 49, Número 6, Pags. 881-890
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biotropica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biotropica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13031/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4b17cda75266e477549dfd2121d766e5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928908271779840