Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031 |
Resumo: | Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation. |
id |
INPA-2_b2ce1621436263fd427e8ab99c68a02f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/13031 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rocha, RicardoFerreira, Diogo F.López-Baucells, AdriàFarneda, Fábio Z.Carreiras, João Manuel de BritoPalmeirim, Jorge ManuelMeyer, Christoph F.J.2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1303110.1111/btp.12474Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.Volume 49, Número 6, Pags. 881-890Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbundanceBatBehavioral ResponseBioenergeticsConservation PlanningEdge EffectHabitat FragmentationHabitat UseIntraspecific VariationMatrixNeotropical RegionSeasonalitySecondary ForestSex RatioSex-related DifferenceSpatial AnalysisAmazon RiverCarollia PerspicillataRhinophylla PumilioVertebrataDoes sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical batsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiotropicaengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf627014https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13031/1/artigo-inpa.pdf4b17cda75266e477549dfd2121d766e5MD511/130312020-07-14 09:06:35.497oai:repositorio:1/13031Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T13:06:35Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
title |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
spellingShingle |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats Rocha, Ricardo Abundance Bat Behavioral Response Bioenergetics Conservation Planning Edge Effect Habitat Fragmentation Habitat Use Intraspecific Variation Matrix Neotropical Region Seasonality Secondary Forest Sex Ratio Sex-related Difference Spatial Analysis Amazon River Carollia Perspicillata Rhinophylla Pumilio Vertebrata |
title_short |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
title_full |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
title_fullStr |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
title_sort |
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats |
author |
Rocha, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Rocha, Ricardo Ferreira, Diogo F. López-Baucells, Adrià Farneda, Fábio Z. Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel Meyer, Christoph F.J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Diogo F. López-Baucells, Adrià Farneda, Fábio Z. Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel Meyer, Christoph F.J. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Ricardo Ferreira, Diogo F. López-Baucells, Adrià Farneda, Fábio Z. Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel Meyer, Christoph F.J. |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Abundance Bat Behavioral Response Bioenergetics Conservation Planning Edge Effect Habitat Fragmentation Habitat Use Intraspecific Variation Matrix Neotropical Region Seasonality Secondary Forest Sex Ratio Sex-related Difference Spatial Analysis Amazon River Carollia Perspicillata Rhinophylla Pumilio Vertebrata |
topic |
Abundance Bat Behavioral Response Bioenergetics Conservation Planning Edge Effect Habitat Fragmentation Habitat Use Intraspecific Variation Matrix Neotropical Region Seasonality Secondary Forest Sex Ratio Sex-related Difference Spatial Analysis Amazon River Carollia Perspicillata Rhinophylla Pumilio Vertebrata |
description |
Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-21T17:03:14Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-21T17:03:14Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1111/btp.12474 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1111/btp.12474 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 49, Número 6, Pags. 881-890 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biotropica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biotropica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13031/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4b17cda75266e477549dfd2121d766e5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928908271779840 |