Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Jonh Billy
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Gaio,Denilton Carlos, Curado,Leone Francisco Amorim, Nogueira,José de Souza, Valle Júnior,Luiz Claudio Galvão, Rodrigues,Thiago Rangel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ambiente & Água
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2019000300302
Resumo: Abstract This study analyzed the performance of the Brunt (1932), Swinbank (1963), Idso and Jackson (1969), Brutsaert (1975), Idso (1981), and Bignami et al. (1995) methods to estimate atmospheric emissivity under grass-dominated savannas (known as campo sujo Cerrado), in the region of Baixada Cuiabana. The estimates were compared with data obtained by energy balance equation in two seasons, dry season (May to August), and wet season (September to December) of 2009. The Swinbank and Idso and Jackson methods, that consider only air temperature, show better performances for the wet season. However, methods that consider water vapor pressure and air temperature (Brunt, Brutsaert, Bignami and Idso) show good performances for the dry season. The Idso and Brutsaert methods show the highest index of agreement and are recommended to estimate atmospheric emissivity for the region.
id IPABHI-1_4f2e1fe4535c6b0206ecc33571aaa759
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1980-993X2019000300302
network_acronym_str IPABHI-1
network_name_str Revista Ambiente & Água
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerradoair temperaturecampo sujo Cerradowater vapor pressureAbstract This study analyzed the performance of the Brunt (1932), Swinbank (1963), Idso and Jackson (1969), Brutsaert (1975), Idso (1981), and Bignami et al. (1995) methods to estimate atmospheric emissivity under grass-dominated savannas (known as campo sujo Cerrado), in the region of Baixada Cuiabana. The estimates were compared with data obtained by energy balance equation in two seasons, dry season (May to August), and wet season (September to December) of 2009. The Swinbank and Idso and Jackson methods, that consider only air temperature, show better performances for the wet season. However, methods that consider water vapor pressure and air temperature (Brunt, Brutsaert, Bignami and Idso) show good performances for the dry season. The Idso and Brutsaert methods show the highest index of agreement and are recommended to estimate atmospheric emissivity for the region.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2019000300302Revista Ambiente & Água v.14 n.3 2019reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2288info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Jonh BillyGaio,Denilton CarlosCurado,Leone Francisco AmorimNogueira,José de SouzaValle Júnior,Luiz Claudio GalvãoRodrigues,Thiago Rangeleng2019-05-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2019000300302Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2019-05-07T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
title Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
spellingShingle Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
Silva,Jonh Billy
air temperature
campo sujo Cerrado
water vapor pressure
title_short Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
title_full Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
title_fullStr Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
title_sort Evaluation of methods for estimating atmospheric emissivity in Mato-Grossense Cerrado
author Silva,Jonh Billy
author_facet Silva,Jonh Billy
Gaio,Denilton Carlos
Curado,Leone Francisco Amorim
Nogueira,José de Souza
Valle Júnior,Luiz Claudio Galvão
Rodrigues,Thiago Rangel
author_role author
author2 Gaio,Denilton Carlos
Curado,Leone Francisco Amorim
Nogueira,José de Souza
Valle Júnior,Luiz Claudio Galvão
Rodrigues,Thiago Rangel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Jonh Billy
Gaio,Denilton Carlos
Curado,Leone Francisco Amorim
Nogueira,José de Souza
Valle Júnior,Luiz Claudio Galvão
Rodrigues,Thiago Rangel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv air temperature
campo sujo Cerrado
water vapor pressure
topic air temperature
campo sujo Cerrado
water vapor pressure
description Abstract This study analyzed the performance of the Brunt (1932), Swinbank (1963), Idso and Jackson (1969), Brutsaert (1975), Idso (1981), and Bignami et al. (1995) methods to estimate atmospheric emissivity under grass-dominated savannas (known as campo sujo Cerrado), in the region of Baixada Cuiabana. The estimates were compared with data obtained by energy balance equation in two seasons, dry season (May to August), and wet season (September to December) of 2009. The Swinbank and Idso and Jackson methods, that consider only air temperature, show better performances for the wet season. However, methods that consider water vapor pressure and air temperature (Brunt, Brutsaert, Bignami and Idso) show good performances for the dry season. The Idso and Brutsaert methods show the highest index of agreement and are recommended to estimate atmospheric emissivity for the region.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2019000300302
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2019000300302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.4136/ambi-agua.2288
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água v.14 n.3 2019
reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água
instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron:IPABHI
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron_str IPABHI
institution IPABHI
reponame_str Revista Ambiente & Água
collection Revista Ambiente & Água
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ambi.agua@gmail.com
_version_ 1752129750797647872

Registros relacionados