Is the Washington Consensus Dead?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hailu, Degol
Data de Publicação: 2009
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
dARK ID: ark:/51990/00130000026x4
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15463
Resumo: The recent G20 meeting in London elevated the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to a new level. Its lending capacity was tripled to US$750 billion. In the aftermath of World War II, the IMF was established to deal with declining commodity prices and deteriorating international trade. During the oil price shocks of the 1970s the IMF became lender of last resort, mainly to countries with balance of payments problems. The debt crisis of the early 1980s in Latin America gave the Fund further impetus. By the mid 1980s the IMF and the World Bank had become policy architects in low-income countries. The 1998 Asian financial crisis brought the IMF to the forefront of crisis management. In 2009, we are again at another milestone—the Fund is back with even greater influence. (...)
id IPEA_53dc16b02cfa2687269d5fab4fbd470e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15463
network_acronym_str IPEA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository_id_str
spelling Is the Washington Consensus Dead?¿El Consenso de Washington ha Muerto?Está Morto o Consenso de Washington?Wahshington consensusdeadThe recent G20 meeting in London elevated the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to a new level. Its lending capacity was tripled to US$750 billion. In the aftermath of World War II, the IMF was established to deal with declining commodity prices and deteriorating international trade. During the oil price shocks of the 1970s the IMF became lender of last resort, mainly to countries with balance of payments problems. The debt crisis of the early 1980s in Latin America gave the Fund further impetus. By the mid 1980s the IMF and the World Bank had become policy architects in low-income countries. The 1998 Asian financial crisis brought the IMF to the forefront of crisis management. In 2009, we are again at another milestone—the Fund is back with even greater influence. (...)A recente reunião em Londres do G20 elevou o Fundo Monetário Internacional (FMI) a um1 p.2024-10-03T23:57:40Z2024-10-03T23:57:40Z2009One Pagerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15463ark:/51990/00130000026x4International Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHailu, Degolengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:21:56Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15463Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:21:56Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
¿El Consenso de Washington ha Muerto?
Está Morto o Consenso de Washington?
title Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
spellingShingle Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
Hailu, Degol
Wahshington consensus
dead
title_short Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
title_full Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
title_fullStr Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
title_sort Is the Washington Consensus Dead?
author Hailu, Degol
author_facet Hailu, Degol
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hailu, Degol
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Wahshington consensus
dead
topic Wahshington consensus
dead
description The recent G20 meeting in London elevated the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to a new level. Its lending capacity was tripled to US$750 billion. In the aftermath of World War II, the IMF was established to deal with declining commodity prices and deteriorating international trade. During the oil price shocks of the 1970s the IMF became lender of last resort, mainly to countries with balance of payments problems. The debt crisis of the early 1980s in Latin America gave the Fund further impetus. By the mid 1980s the IMF and the World Bank had become policy architects in low-income countries. The 1998 Asian financial crisis brought the IMF to the forefront of crisis management. In 2009, we are again at another milestone—the Fund is back with even greater influence. (...)
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2024-10-03T23:57:40Z
2024-10-03T23:57:40Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv One Pager
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15463
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/51990/00130000026x4
url https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15463
identifier_str_mv ark:/51990/00130000026x4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron:IPEA
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron_str IPEA
institution IPEA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
collection Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv suporte@ipea.gov.br
_version_ 1815173051502821376