Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hennig, Kelvin Mereles
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Souza, Natieli Edileni de, Massarolo, Kelly Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
Texto Completo: http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/818
Resumo: Population growth and the change in old social habits have been driving the demand for protein consumption on the planet. Due to the high economic and environmental costs and the time required to produce traditional animal proteins, the demand for new sources of alternative proteins has been increasing over time. The use of alternative proteins, such as those of plant and insect origin, has become increasingly necessary for the survival and development of humanity. These diverse protein sources require studies to evaluate their technological properties and thus suggest better applications for each of them. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics and main functionalities of alternative proteins from plant and insect sources. To this end, the proximal composition (moisture, lipids, proteins, ash and carbohydrates) of alternative proteins from plant sources (Glycine max soybean and Phaseolus vulgaris Pinto Group carioca beans) and insects (Tenebrio molitor mealworm and Gryllus black cricket), as well as, the technological properties of water retention capacity (WRC) and oil retention capacity (ORC), emulsion stability (ES), foaming capacity (FC) and foam stability (FS) were determined. Insect flours had higher protein contents (cricket 65.9% and mealworm 63.8%) compared to vegetable flours (beans 51.4% and soy 38.0%). Soy protein had the highest WRC with a value of 2.8 mL/g, followed by mealworm (1.7 mL/g), cricket (1.7 mL/g) and beans (0.9 mL/g). And as for ORC, the flours presented similar values ​​for soybeans and beans, crickets and mealworms (0.7 mL/g). Protein flours of vegetable origin showed higher ES values, with bean protein at 62.5% and soy protein at 52.5%. Bean flour had the highest FC (66.7%) and FS (94.1%). Insect flours presented promising protein content and technological functionalities for applications and thus contribute to new ingredients for food supplements and food products.
id JRG_2a1ee0cbfab3836d5f3d84f8352d0b63
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/818
network_acronym_str JRG
network_name_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteinsEstudo comparativo de funcionalidade de proteínas ProteínaInsetos comestíveisPropriedades funcionaisProteinEdible insectsFunctional propertiesPopulation growth and the change in old social habits have been driving the demand for protein consumption on the planet. Due to the high economic and environmental costs and the time required to produce traditional animal proteins, the demand for new sources of alternative proteins has been increasing over time. The use of alternative proteins, such as those of plant and insect origin, has become increasingly necessary for the survival and development of humanity. These diverse protein sources require studies to evaluate their technological properties and thus suggest better applications for each of them. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics and main functionalities of alternative proteins from plant and insect sources. To this end, the proximal composition (moisture, lipids, proteins, ash and carbohydrates) of alternative proteins from plant sources (Glycine max soybean and Phaseolus vulgaris Pinto Group carioca beans) and insects (Tenebrio molitor mealworm and Gryllus black cricket), as well as, the technological properties of water retention capacity (WRC) and oil retention capacity (ORC), emulsion stability (ES), foaming capacity (FC) and foam stability (FS) were determined. Insect flours had higher protein contents (cricket 65.9% and mealworm 63.8%) compared to vegetable flours (beans 51.4% and soy 38.0%). Soy protein had the highest WRC with a value of 2.8 mL/g, followed by mealworm (1.7 mL/g), cricket (1.7 mL/g) and beans (0.9 mL/g). And as for ORC, the flours presented similar values ​​for soybeans and beans, crickets and mealworms (0.7 mL/g). Protein flours of vegetable origin showed higher ES values, with bean protein at 62.5% and soy protein at 52.5%. Bean flour had the highest FC (66.7%) and FS (94.1%). Insect flours presented promising protein content and technological functionalities for applications and thus contribute to new ingredients for food supplements and food products.O crescimento populacional e a mudança de antigos hábitos sociais, vem impulsionando a demanda pelo consumo de proteínas no planeta. Devido ao alto custo econômico, ambiental e o tempo necessário para a produção de proteínas animais tradicionais, a demanda por novas fontes de proteínas alternativas vem aumentando com o passar do tempo. O uso de proteínas alternativas, como as de origem vegetal e de insetos, tem se tornado cada vez mais necessário para a sobrevivência e desenvolvimento da humanidade. Essas diversas fontes proteicas demandam estudos para avaliar suas propriedades tecnológicas e assim sugerir melhores aplicações para cada uma delas. Portanto, o objetivo foi avaliar as características físico-químicas e principais funcionalidades das proteínas alternativas de fontes vegetais e de insetos. Para isso, primeiramente foi determinado a composição proximal (umidade, lipídios, proteínas, cinzas e carboidratos) das proteínas alternativas de fontes vegetais (soja Glycine max e feijão carioca Phaseolus vulgaris Pinto Group) e insetos (larva da farinha Tenebrio molitor e grilo preto Gryllus assimilis), bem como as propriedades tecnológicas de capacidade de retenção de água (CRA) e óleo (CRO), estabilidade de emulsão (EE), capacidade de formação de espuma (CFE) e estabilidade da espuma (EES). As farinhas de insetos apresentaram maiores teores de proteínas (grilo 65,9% e tenébrio 63,8%) em relação as farinhas de vegetais (feijão 51,4% e soja 38,0%). A proteína de soja apresentou a maior CRA com valor de 2,8 mL/g, seguido do tenébrio (1,7 mL/g), grilo (1,7 mL/g) e feijão (0,9 mL/g). E quanto a CRO, as farinhas apresentaram valores semelhantes para soja e feijão, grilo e tenébrio (0,7 mL/g). As farinhas das proteínas de origem vegetal apresentaram maiores valores de EE, sendo a proteína do feijão com 62,5% e soja com 52,5%. A farinha de feijão apresentou a maior CFE (66,7%) e EES (94,1%). As farinhas de insetos apresentaram teores de proteínas e funcionalidades tecnológicas promissoras para aplicações e assim contribuir com novos ingredientes para su­­plementos alimentares e produtos alimentícios.  Editora JRG2023-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/81810.55892/jrg.v6i13.818ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.818JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 6 No. 13 (2023): JRG Journal of Academic Studies; 2160-2171JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 6 Núm. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-2171JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 6 N. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-2171Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 6 n. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-21712595-1661ark:/57118/jrg.v6i13reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicosinstname:Editora JRGinstacron:JRGporhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/818/757https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHennig, Kelvin MerelesSouza, Natieli Edileni deMassarolo, Kelly Cristina2023-11-28T16:19:06Zoai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/818Revistahttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrgPRIhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/oaiprofessorjonas@gmail.com||2595-16612595-1661opendoar:2023-11-28T16:19:06Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRGfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
Estudo comparativo de funcionalidade de proteínas
title Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
spellingShingle Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
Hennig, Kelvin Mereles
Proteína
Insetos comestíveis
Propriedades funcionais
Protein
Edible insects
Functional properties
title_short Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
title_full Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
title_fullStr Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
title_sort Comparative study of the functionality of alternative proteins
author Hennig, Kelvin Mereles
author_facet Hennig, Kelvin Mereles
Souza, Natieli Edileni de
Massarolo, Kelly Cristina
author_role author
author2 Souza, Natieli Edileni de
Massarolo, Kelly Cristina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hennig, Kelvin Mereles
Souza, Natieli Edileni de
Massarolo, Kelly Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Proteína
Insetos comestíveis
Propriedades funcionais
Protein
Edible insects
Functional properties
topic Proteína
Insetos comestíveis
Propriedades funcionais
Protein
Edible insects
Functional properties
description Population growth and the change in old social habits have been driving the demand for protein consumption on the planet. Due to the high economic and environmental costs and the time required to produce traditional animal proteins, the demand for new sources of alternative proteins has been increasing over time. The use of alternative proteins, such as those of plant and insect origin, has become increasingly necessary for the survival and development of humanity. These diverse protein sources require studies to evaluate their technological properties and thus suggest better applications for each of them. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics and main functionalities of alternative proteins from plant and insect sources. To this end, the proximal composition (moisture, lipids, proteins, ash and carbohydrates) of alternative proteins from plant sources (Glycine max soybean and Phaseolus vulgaris Pinto Group carioca beans) and insects (Tenebrio molitor mealworm and Gryllus black cricket), as well as, the technological properties of water retention capacity (WRC) and oil retention capacity (ORC), emulsion stability (ES), foaming capacity (FC) and foam stability (FS) were determined. Insect flours had higher protein contents (cricket 65.9% and mealworm 63.8%) compared to vegetable flours (beans 51.4% and soy 38.0%). Soy protein had the highest WRC with a value of 2.8 mL/g, followed by mealworm (1.7 mL/g), cricket (1.7 mL/g) and beans (0.9 mL/g). And as for ORC, the flours presented similar values ​​for soybeans and beans, crickets and mealworms (0.7 mL/g). Protein flours of vegetable origin showed higher ES values, with bean protein at 62.5% and soy protein at 52.5%. Bean flour had the highest FC (66.7%) and FS (94.1%). Insect flours presented promising protein content and technological functionalities for applications and thus contribute to new ingredients for food supplements and food products.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/818
10.55892/jrg.v6i13.818
ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.818
url http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/818
identifier_str_mv 10.55892/jrg.v6i13.818
ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/818/757
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 6 No. 13 (2023): JRG Journal of Academic Studies; 2160-2171
JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 6 Núm. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-2171
JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 6 N. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-2171
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 6 n. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 2160-2171
2595-1661
ark:/57118/jrg.v6i13
reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
instname:Editora JRG
instacron:JRG
instname_str Editora JRG
instacron_str JRG
institution JRG
reponame_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
collection Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRG
repository.mail.fl_str_mv professorjonas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797068982716465152