The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manoel, Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Caruso, Sergio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
Texto Completo: http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/791
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the relevance of Constitutional Amendment 72 of 2013 - PEC das domestics to ensure the labor rights of the domestic employee. It emphasizes that the concept of domestic servant from colonial Brazil to imperial Brazil, there was no legal definition. The first legal concept in our country came about with the Municipal Posture Code of São Paulo 1916, conceived as domestic servant that individual who performs his function at home, has no economic purpose, since the domestic worker carries out his activities to receive a salary for bear your expenses and that of your family. Domestic work in Brazil was included in Brazilian labor legislation only with Law No. 5,859, of December 11, 1972. However, this law did not fully contemplate domestic workers, as it only guaranteed them three rights, including the registration of this employee to the Social Security System. In turn, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, although it has advanced in relation to the domestic worker, with some guarantees and achievements such as Article 7 in item I, on equal rights between the sexes and that no domestic worker will be subjected to torture, in order to reduce occupational risks in the performance of their functions, among others. However, the 1988 Constitution denied these workers several rights guaranteed in relation to other employees of other categories. Therefore, it did not fulfill its essence of equality among workers, therefore, it cannot be considered a citizen constitution. The article is outlined as follows, at first presenting the conception of domestic employment and later an approach to domestic work legislation in Brazil, in order to discuss the main changes that have occurred in the domestic employee's law. The main authors consulted in this article were Cristo (2015), Damasceno and Chagas (2013) and Silva (2016). The article is scientific research of bibliographical nature. In view of this, only with the Household PEC that domestic servant really had several relevant achievements, social rights foreseen and incorporated into the new regulation of article 7 of the Constitution, which were not guaranteed by the 1988 Magna Carta.
id JRG_5286e3d9ada0ea6bf64175352d5af708
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/791
network_acronym_str JRG
network_name_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository_id_str
spelling The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rightsA importância da PEC das domésticas para consolidação dos direitos trabalhistasEmpregado DomésticoPEC das DomésticasDireitosIgualdadeDomestic EmployeeDomestic Workers AmendmentRightsEqualityThe purpose of this article is to demonstrate the relevance of Constitutional Amendment 72 of 2013 - PEC das domestics to ensure the labor rights of the domestic employee. It emphasizes that the concept of domestic servant from colonial Brazil to imperial Brazil, there was no legal definition. The first legal concept in our country came about with the Municipal Posture Code of São Paulo 1916, conceived as domestic servant that individual who performs his function at home, has no economic purpose, since the domestic worker carries out his activities to receive a salary for bear your expenses and that of your family. Domestic work in Brazil was included in Brazilian labor legislation only with Law No. 5,859, of December 11, 1972. However, this law did not fully contemplate domestic workers, as it only guaranteed them three rights, including the registration of this employee to the Social Security System. In turn, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, although it has advanced in relation to the domestic worker, with some guarantees and achievements such as Article 7 in item I, on equal rights between the sexes and that no domestic worker will be subjected to torture, in order to reduce occupational risks in the performance of their functions, among others. However, the 1988 Constitution denied these workers several rights guaranteed in relation to other employees of other categories. Therefore, it did not fulfill its essence of equality among workers, therefore, it cannot be considered a citizen constitution. The article is outlined as follows, at first presenting the conception of domestic employment and later an approach to domestic work legislation in Brazil, in order to discuss the main changes that have occurred in the domestic employee's law. The main authors consulted in this article were Cristo (2015), Damasceno and Chagas (2013) and Silva (2016). The article is scientific research of bibliographical nature. In view of this, only with the Household PEC that domestic servant really had several relevant achievements, social rights foreseen and incorporated into the new regulation of article 7 of the Constitution, which were not guaranteed by the 1988 Magna Carta.O objetivo deste artigo é demonstrar a relevância da Emenda Constitucional 72 de 2013 – PEC das domésticas para assegurar os direitos trabalhistas do empregado doméstico. Ressalta que o conceito de empregado doméstico desde do Brasil colonial até o Brasil imperial, não existia uma definição legal. O primeiro conceito jurídico em nosso País se deu com o Código de Postura Municipal de São Paulo 1916 concebido como empregado doméstico aquele indivíduo que realiza sua função em residência, não tem finalidade econômica, pois, o trabalhador doméstico exerce suas atividades para receber um salário para arcar com suas despesas e da sua família. O trabalho doméstico no Brasil foi inserido na legislação trabalhista brasileira somente com a Lei nº 5.859, de 11 dezembro de 1972. Contudo, essa lei não contemplou completamente os trabalhadores domésticos, pois, só garantiu a eles três direitos, entre esses a inscrição deste empregado ao Sistema de Previdência Social. Por sua vez a Constituição Brasileira de 1988, embora tenha avançado em relação ao trabalhador doméstico, com algumas garantias e conquistas a exemplo do artigo 7º no inciso I, na igualdade de direitos entre os sexos e que nenhum trabalhador doméstico será submetido a tortura, de forma a diminuir os riscos ocupacionais na execução de suas funções, entre outras. Entretanto, a Constituição de 1988, negou a esses trabalhadores vários direitos assegurados com relação aos demais empregados de outras categorias. Portanto, a mesma não cumpriu com sua essência de igualdade entre os trabalhadores, por isso, não pode ser considerada uma constituição cidadã. O artigo está esquematizado do seguinte modo, no primeiro momento apresentação a concepção de emprego doméstico e posteriormente uma abordagem da legislação do trabalho doméstico no Brasil, de forma a dissertar sobre as principais mudanças ocorridas no direito do empregado doméstico. Os principais autores consultados nesse artigo foram Cristo (2015), Damasceno e Chagas (2013) e Silva (2016). O artigo trata-se de uma pesquisa cientifica de natureza bibliográfica. Diante disto somente com a PEC das Domésticas que as empregadas domésticas realmente tiveram várias conquistas relevantes, direitos sociais previstos e incorporados à nova regulamentação do artigo 7º da Constituição, que não foram assegurados pela Carta Magna de 1988.Editora JRG2023-11-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/79110.55892/jrg.v6i13.791ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.791JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 6 No. 13 (2023): JRG Journal of Academic Studies; 1807-1818JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 6 Núm. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-1818JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 6 N. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-1818Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 6 n. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-18182595-1661ark:/57118/jrg.v6i13reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicosinstname:Editora JRGinstacron:JRGporhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/791/728https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessManoel, AparecidaCaruso, Sergio2023-11-17T14:09:11Zoai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/791Revistahttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrgPRIhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/oaiprofessorjonas@gmail.com||2595-16612595-1661opendoar:2023-11-17T14:09:11Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRGfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
A importância da PEC das domésticas para consolidação dos direitos trabalhistas
title The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
spellingShingle The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
Manoel, Aparecida
Empregado Doméstico
PEC das Domésticas
Direitos
Igualdade
Domestic Employee
Domestic Workers Amendment
Rights
Equality
title_short The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
title_full The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
title_fullStr The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
title_full_unstemmed The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
title_sort The importance of the domestic workers’ constitutional amendment for the consolidation of labor rights
author Manoel, Aparecida
author_facet Manoel, Aparecida
Caruso, Sergio
author_role author
author2 Caruso, Sergio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manoel, Aparecida
Caruso, Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Empregado Doméstico
PEC das Domésticas
Direitos
Igualdade
Domestic Employee
Domestic Workers Amendment
Rights
Equality
topic Empregado Doméstico
PEC das Domésticas
Direitos
Igualdade
Domestic Employee
Domestic Workers Amendment
Rights
Equality
description The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the relevance of Constitutional Amendment 72 of 2013 - PEC das domestics to ensure the labor rights of the domestic employee. It emphasizes that the concept of domestic servant from colonial Brazil to imperial Brazil, there was no legal definition. The first legal concept in our country came about with the Municipal Posture Code of São Paulo 1916, conceived as domestic servant that individual who performs his function at home, has no economic purpose, since the domestic worker carries out his activities to receive a salary for bear your expenses and that of your family. Domestic work in Brazil was included in Brazilian labor legislation only with Law No. 5,859, of December 11, 1972. However, this law did not fully contemplate domestic workers, as it only guaranteed them three rights, including the registration of this employee to the Social Security System. In turn, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, although it has advanced in relation to the domestic worker, with some guarantees and achievements such as Article 7 in item I, on equal rights between the sexes and that no domestic worker will be subjected to torture, in order to reduce occupational risks in the performance of their functions, among others. However, the 1988 Constitution denied these workers several rights guaranteed in relation to other employees of other categories. Therefore, it did not fulfill its essence of equality among workers, therefore, it cannot be considered a citizen constitution. The article is outlined as follows, at first presenting the conception of domestic employment and later an approach to domestic work legislation in Brazil, in order to discuss the main changes that have occurred in the domestic employee's law. The main authors consulted in this article were Cristo (2015), Damasceno and Chagas (2013) and Silva (2016). The article is scientific research of bibliographical nature. In view of this, only with the Household PEC that domestic servant really had several relevant achievements, social rights foreseen and incorporated into the new regulation of article 7 of the Constitution, which were not guaranteed by the 1988 Magna Carta.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/791
10.55892/jrg.v6i13.791
ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.791
url http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/791
identifier_str_mv 10.55892/jrg.v6i13.791
ark:/57118/JRG.v6i13.791
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/791/728
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 6 No. 13 (2023): JRG Journal of Academic Studies; 1807-1818
JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 6 Núm. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-1818
JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 6 N. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-1818
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 6 n. 13 (2023): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; 1807-1818
2595-1661
ark:/57118/jrg.v6i13
reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
instname:Editora JRG
instacron:JRG
instname_str Editora JRG
instacron_str JRG
institution JRG
reponame_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
collection Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRG
repository.mail.fl_str_mv professorjonas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797068982666133504