WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FREITAS,PABLO F. P.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: ODELIUS,CATARINA C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712021000300301
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To identify and analyze differences in the tasks, knowledge, and social features of the work of civil servants of the Superior Court of Justice, and, secondarily, to verify the factorial, convergent, predictive, and discriminative validity of the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ) in the Brazilian Judiciary context. Originality/value: With the WDQ’s development, the work design became the subject of further studies all around the world. Also, in Brazil, since its translation and adaptation, this variable has caused great repercussions in people management, becoming the first study within the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary. Design/methodology/approach: Through a survey sent to 2,898 civil servants, 895 responses were obtained and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factorial analysis, reliability analysis, Kendall’s tau correlation analysis, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings: The most indicated work feature was social support, and the least indicated was interaction outside the organization. Special knowledge was most required from professionals with higher education. For the men, there were more problem solving, specialized knowledge, and decision-making autonomy in their work. Civil servants who work in judicial activities claimed to have more meaningful tasks. Managers claimed to have less autonomy in planning their tasks, as all other civil servants stated that their work has a more definite beginning, middle, and end. In a public body of great size and complexity, work features are differentiated by their sociodemographic and functional variables, requiring customization in the management practices of people and organizational policies.
id MACKENZIE-2_1ab44725a4ef4af4421fc3b3d65d6612
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-69712021000300301
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE-2
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICEWork DesignWork Design QuestionnairePublic SectorJudiciarySuperior Court Of JusticeABSTRACT Purpose: To identify and analyze differences in the tasks, knowledge, and social features of the work of civil servants of the Superior Court of Justice, and, secondarily, to verify the factorial, convergent, predictive, and discriminative validity of the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ) in the Brazilian Judiciary context. Originality/value: With the WDQ’s development, the work design became the subject of further studies all around the world. Also, in Brazil, since its translation and adaptation, this variable has caused great repercussions in people management, becoming the first study within the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary. Design/methodology/approach: Through a survey sent to 2,898 civil servants, 895 responses were obtained and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factorial analysis, reliability analysis, Kendall’s tau correlation analysis, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings: The most indicated work feature was social support, and the least indicated was interaction outside the organization. Special knowledge was most required from professionals with higher education. For the men, there were more problem solving, specialized knowledge, and decision-making autonomy in their work. Civil servants who work in judicial activities claimed to have more meaningful tasks. Managers claimed to have less autonomy in planning their tasks, as all other civil servants stated that their work has a more definite beginning, middle, and end. In a public body of great size and complexity, work features are differentiated by their sociodemographic and functional variables, requiring customization in the management practices of people and organizational policies.Editora MackenzieUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712021000300301RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.22 n.3 2021reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:MACKENZIE10.1590/1678-6971/eramg210192info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFREITAS,PABLO F. P.ODELIUS,CATARINA C.eng2021-06-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-69712021000300301Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/ram/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2021-06-10T00:00RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
spellingShingle WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
FREITAS,PABLO F. P.
Work Design
Work Design Questionnaire
Public Sector
Judiciary
Superior Court Of Justice
title_short WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_full WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_fullStr WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_full_unstemmed WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_sort WORK DESIGN: WORK FEATURES OF CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
author FREITAS,PABLO F. P.
author_facet FREITAS,PABLO F. P.
ODELIUS,CATARINA C.
author_role author
author2 ODELIUS,CATARINA C.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FREITAS,PABLO F. P.
ODELIUS,CATARINA C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Work Design
Work Design Questionnaire
Public Sector
Judiciary
Superior Court Of Justice
topic Work Design
Work Design Questionnaire
Public Sector
Judiciary
Superior Court Of Justice
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To identify and analyze differences in the tasks, knowledge, and social features of the work of civil servants of the Superior Court of Justice, and, secondarily, to verify the factorial, convergent, predictive, and discriminative validity of the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ) in the Brazilian Judiciary context. Originality/value: With the WDQ’s development, the work design became the subject of further studies all around the world. Also, in Brazil, since its translation and adaptation, this variable has caused great repercussions in people management, becoming the first study within the scope of the Brazilian Judiciary. Design/methodology/approach: Through a survey sent to 2,898 civil servants, 895 responses were obtained and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factorial analysis, reliability analysis, Kendall’s tau correlation analysis, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings: The most indicated work feature was social support, and the least indicated was interaction outside the organization. Special knowledge was most required from professionals with higher education. For the men, there were more problem solving, specialized knowledge, and decision-making autonomy in their work. Civil servants who work in judicial activities claimed to have more meaningful tasks. Managers claimed to have less autonomy in planning their tasks, as all other civil servants stated that their work has a more definite beginning, middle, and end. In a public body of great size and complexity, work features are differentiated by their sociodemographic and functional variables, requiring customization in the management practices of people and organizational policies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712021000300301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712021000300301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-6971/eramg210192
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.22 n.3 2021
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1752128650558308352