QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: KLEIN,LEANDER L.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: PEREIRA,BRENO A. D., LEMOS,RICARDO B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712019000300303
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to analyze the parameters of the Quality of Working Life (QWL) evaluation in a public organization and the perception of the employees in relation to these factors. Originality/value: The article advances in the theoretical evaluation of QWL in a public context and expanding the presentation of parameters in the job environment. In practice, we present some behavior patterns in different groups of analysis. So, we deepen the understanding of assumptions and hypotheses already existing in theory and propose new ones regarding the standards of QWL. Design/methodology/approach: Ferreira’s (2011) model was taken as the basis for the development of empirical research. The method of this work is quantitative research, whose data collection was performed through the use of a questionnaire. The analysis of the data was performed mainly through the T and ANOVA tests. Findings: As the main results, it is possible to highlight the 9 factors obtained from the exploratory factorial analysis. In addition, there have been some different perceptions of groups of servers regarding these factors. From this, it is concluded that the evaluation of the QWL and its parameters is perceived differently between servers when they are grouped in groups with different characteristics.
id MACKENZIE-2_5336c880d515a4f705c4824906cba7ee
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-69712019000300303
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE-2
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICEQuality of working lifeEvaluationParametersPublic serviceQuantitative studyABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to analyze the parameters of the Quality of Working Life (QWL) evaluation in a public organization and the perception of the employees in relation to these factors. Originality/value: The article advances in the theoretical evaluation of QWL in a public context and expanding the presentation of parameters in the job environment. In practice, we present some behavior patterns in different groups of analysis. So, we deepen the understanding of assumptions and hypotheses already existing in theory and propose new ones regarding the standards of QWL. Design/methodology/approach: Ferreira’s (2011) model was taken as the basis for the development of empirical research. The method of this work is quantitative research, whose data collection was performed through the use of a questionnaire. The analysis of the data was performed mainly through the T and ANOVA tests. Findings: As the main results, it is possible to highlight the 9 factors obtained from the exploratory factorial analysis. In addition, there have been some different perceptions of groups of servers regarding these factors. From this, it is concluded that the evaluation of the QWL and its parameters is perceived differently between servers when they are grouped in groups with different characteristics.Editora MackenzieUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712019000300303RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.20 n.3 2019reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:MACKENZIE10.1590/1678-6971/eramg190134info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKLEIN,LEANDER L.PEREIRA,BRENO A. D.LEMOS,RICARDO B.eng2019-06-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-69712019000300303Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/ram/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2019-06-24T00:00RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
title QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
spellingShingle QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
KLEIN,LEANDER L.
Quality of working life
Evaluation
Parameters
Public service
Quantitative study
title_short QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
title_full QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
title_fullStr QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
title_full_unstemmed QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
title_sort QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE: PARAMETERS AND EVALUATION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE
author KLEIN,LEANDER L.
author_facet KLEIN,LEANDER L.
PEREIRA,BRENO A. D.
LEMOS,RICARDO B.
author_role author
author2 PEREIRA,BRENO A. D.
LEMOS,RICARDO B.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv KLEIN,LEANDER L.
PEREIRA,BRENO A. D.
LEMOS,RICARDO B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quality of working life
Evaluation
Parameters
Public service
Quantitative study
topic Quality of working life
Evaluation
Parameters
Public service
Quantitative study
description ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to analyze the parameters of the Quality of Working Life (QWL) evaluation in a public organization and the perception of the employees in relation to these factors. Originality/value: The article advances in the theoretical evaluation of QWL in a public context and expanding the presentation of parameters in the job environment. In practice, we present some behavior patterns in different groups of analysis. So, we deepen the understanding of assumptions and hypotheses already existing in theory and propose new ones regarding the standards of QWL. Design/methodology/approach: Ferreira’s (2011) model was taken as the basis for the development of empirical research. The method of this work is quantitative research, whose data collection was performed through the use of a questionnaire. The analysis of the data was performed mainly through the T and ANOVA tests. Findings: As the main results, it is possible to highlight the 9 factors obtained from the exploratory factorial analysis. In addition, there have been some different perceptions of groups of servers regarding these factors. From this, it is concluded that the evaluation of the QWL and its parameters is perceived differently between servers when they are grouped in groups with different characteristics.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712019000300303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712019000300303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-6971/eramg190134
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.20 n.3 2019
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1752128650178723840