Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, Claudio V.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Alfinito, Solange, Galvão, César Augusto de Souza Pinto, Tsé, Bruna Chie Yin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657
Resumo: The Brazilian jeitinho and the Chinese guanxi are considered indigenous forms of informal influence. The first can be described as behavior tactics aimed at resolving social problems. The latter is broadly described as achieving goals through the use of social networks. These influence processes were chosen because they are commonly used in business negotiations in Brazil and China. Thus, understand their peculiarity is fundamental for the management of organizations involved in business in those two cultures. Therefore, we seek to determine whether such influence processes differ, as it is possible that a process said to be indigenous to a particular cultural context is in fact also to be found elsewhere. To investigate their uniqueness and the relationship between them, we conducted two studies. In both studies, participants rated representativeness, typicality and positivity of social scenarios, completed a 21-item version of the Schwartz’s Portrait Value Survey and a scale regarding attitudes towards corruption. Data were analyzed by a series of mean differences tests and stepwise regressions, separately for each nation, and the results are presented by sample. There were two samples: university students’ sample (with 266 Brazilian and 220 Chinese) and managers sample (with 101 Singapore Chinese and 246 Brazilian). Brazil scored significantly higher on Conservation and Self-Enhancement values when compared to China. Chinese respondents perceived the guanxi scenarios as more typical of what happens in China than the jeitinho scenarios, with a reverse pattern being observed for Brazilians. Although Brazilian respondents evaluated jeitinho less positively than Chinese respondents evaluated guanxi scenarios, Brazilians did not perceive jeitinho as more positive than guanxi. For the managers’ samples, it was observed that Brazilians had a significantly lower score on attitudes toward business corruptibility when compared to Chinese managers. Stepwise regressions suggest that positivity was linked with business corruptibility for the respective scenario type by nation.
id MACKENZIE_034802cef0728f38b8e073f1337e78a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5657
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International BusinessBrasileño Jeitinho Versus China Guanxi: Una Investigación de su Influencia Informal para los Negocios InternacionalesJeitinho Brasileiro Versus Guanxi Chinês Investigando suas Influências Informais para Negócios InternacionaisCross-cultural management. Informal influence. Corruptibility. International business. Brazilian jeitinho.Gestión transcultural. Influencia informal. Corruptibilidad. Negocios internacionales. Brasileño jeitinho.Gestão transcultural. Influência informal. Corrupção. Negócios internacionais. Jeitinho brasileiro.The Brazilian jeitinho and the Chinese guanxi are considered indigenous forms of informal influence. The first can be described as behavior tactics aimed at resolving social problems. The latter is broadly described as achieving goals through the use of social networks. These influence processes were chosen because they are commonly used in business negotiations in Brazil and China. Thus, understand their peculiarity is fundamental for the management of organizations involved in business in those two cultures. Therefore, we seek to determine whether such influence processes differ, as it is possible that a process said to be indigenous to a particular cultural context is in fact also to be found elsewhere. To investigate their uniqueness and the relationship between them, we conducted two studies. In both studies, participants rated representativeness, typicality and positivity of social scenarios, completed a 21-item version of the Schwartz’s Portrait Value Survey and a scale regarding attitudes towards corruption. Data were analyzed by a series of mean differences tests and stepwise regressions, separately for each nation, and the results are presented by sample. There were two samples: university students’ sample (with 266 Brazilian and 220 Chinese) and managers sample (with 101 Singapore Chinese and 246 Brazilian). Brazil scored significantly higher on Conservation and Self-Enhancement values when compared to China. Chinese respondents perceived the guanxi scenarios as more typical of what happens in China than the jeitinho scenarios, with a reverse pattern being observed for Brazilians. Although Brazilian respondents evaluated jeitinho less positively than Chinese respondents evaluated guanxi scenarios, Brazilians did not perceive jeitinho as more positive than guanxi. For the managers’ samples, it was observed that Brazilians had a significantly lower score on attitudes toward business corruptibility when compared to Chinese managers. Stepwise regressions suggest that positivity was linked with business corruptibility for the respective scenario type by nation.El jeitinho brasileño y el guanxi chino se consideran las formas indígenas de influencia informal. El primero puede ser descrito como tácticas de comportamiento destinadas a resolver los problemas sociales. Este último se describe en términos generales como el logro de objetivos mediante el uso de las redes sociales. Estos procesos de influencia fueron elegidos porque son de uso común en las negociaciones comerciales en Brasil y China. Por lo tanto, entender su peculiaridad es fundamental para la gestión de las organizaciones que participan en el negocio de las dos culturas. Así, tratamos de determinar si estos procesos son de diferentes influencias, ya que es posible que un proceso, dijo que se origina a partir de un contexto cultural particular, también se pueden encontrar en otros lugares. Para investigar su singularidad y la relación entre ellos, llevado a cabo dos estudios. En ambos estudios, los participantes calificaron la representatividad, la tipicidad y la positividad de los escenarios sociales, completaron una versión de 21 ítems del PVQ, y una escala sobre las actitudes hacia la corrupción. Los datos fueron analizados por una serie de pruebas de diferencias de medias y regresiones stepwise, por separado para cada país, y los resultados se presentan por la muestra. Había dos muestras: la muestra de los universitarios (con 266 chinos y 220 brasileños) y la muestra de los gerentes (con 101 chinos de Singapur y 246 brasileños). Brasil anotó significativamente mayor en los valores de conservación y auto-mejora en comparación con China. Encuestados chinos perciben los escenarios guanxi como más propios de lo que ocurre en China que los escenarios de jeitinho, con un patrón inverso se observa para los brasileños. Aunque los encuestados brasileños evaluaron jeitinho menos positiva que los escenarios evaluados por los guanxi chinos, los brasileños no percibieron jeitinho como más positivo que guanxi. Para las muestras de los gerentes, se observó que los brasileños tuvieron una puntuación significativamente más baja en las actitudes hacia la corruptibilidad de negocios en comparación con los gerentes chinos. Regresiones stepwise indican que la positividad se vinculó con la corruptibilidad de negocios para el respectivo tipo de escenario por nación.O jeitinho brasileiro e o guanxi chinês são considerados formas indígenas de influência informal. O primeiro pode ser descrito como táticas de comportamento no sentido de resolver problemas sociais. O último é genericamente descrito como sendo o alcance de objetivos mediante a utilização de redes sociais. Estes processos de influência foram escolhidos porque são comumente usados nas negociações comerciais no Brasil e na China. Assim, compreender  suas peculiaridades é fundamental para a gestão de organizações inseridas em negócios com estas duas culturas. Para tanto, procura-se determinar se estes processos são de influências diferentes, uma vez que é possível que um processo dito ser originário de um contexto cultural particular, também possa ser encontrado em outro lugar. Para investigar a singularidade e as relações entre eles, foram conduzidos dois estudos. Neles, os participantes avaliaram representatividade, tipicidade e positividade de cenários sociais, além de responderem ao questionário de valores pessoais (PVQ-21) e a uma escala de atitude em relação à corrupção. Os dados foram analisados por testes de diferenças entre médias e regressões hierárquicas, separadamente para cada país, e os resultados apresentados por amostra. Foram duas amostras: uma amostra de estudantes universitários, com 266 brasileiros e 220 chineses; e uma amostra de gestores, com 101 chineses de Cingapura e 246 brasileiros. Os resultados para o Brasil foram significativamente maiores para os valores de Conservação e Auto-transcendência, quando comparado com a China. Os respondentes chineses perceberam os cenários guanxi como mais típicos quanto ao que acontece na China do que os cenários do jeitinho, e houve um padrão inverso para os respondentes brasileiros. Embora os brasileiros tenham avaliado o jeitinho menos positivamente do que os chineses avaliaram o guanxi, os brasileiros não perceberam o jeitinho como mais positivo que o guanxi. Para a amostra de gestores, observou-se que os brasileiros tiveram uma pontuação significativamente menor em atitudes frente à corrupção nos negócios quando comparados com os gestores chineses. Regressões hierárquicas sugerem que a positividade está associada à corrupção nos negócios para cada respectivo tipo de cenários por nação.Editora Mackenzie2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica DescritivaAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 4 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 4 (2015)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEenghttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/5432https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8898https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8899https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8900Torres, Claudio V.Alfinito, SolangeGalvão, César Augusto de Souza PintoTsé, Bruna Chie Yininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-09-01T17:31:14Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5657Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:00:56.418952RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
Brasileño Jeitinho Versus China Guanxi: Una Investigación de su Influencia Informal para los Negocios Internacionales
Jeitinho Brasileiro Versus Guanxi Chinês Investigando suas Influências Informais para Negócios Internacionais
title Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
spellingShingle Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
Torres, Claudio V.
Cross-cultural management. Informal influence. Corruptibility. International business. Brazilian jeitinho.
Gestión transcultural. Influencia informal. Corruptibilidad. Negocios internacionales. Brasileño jeitinho.
Gestão transcultural. Influência informal. Corrupção. Negócios internacionais. Jeitinho brasileiro.
title_short Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
title_full Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
title_fullStr Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
title_sort Brazilian Jeitinho Versus Chinese Guanxi: Investigating their Informal Influence for International Business
author Torres, Claudio V.
author_facet Torres, Claudio V.
Alfinito, Solange
Galvão, César Augusto de Souza Pinto
Tsé, Bruna Chie Yin
author_role author
author2 Alfinito, Solange
Galvão, César Augusto de Souza Pinto
Tsé, Bruna Chie Yin
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Claudio V.
Alfinito, Solange
Galvão, César Augusto de Souza Pinto
Tsé, Bruna Chie Yin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cross-cultural management. Informal influence. Corruptibility. International business. Brazilian jeitinho.
Gestión transcultural. Influencia informal. Corruptibilidad. Negocios internacionales. Brasileño jeitinho.
Gestão transcultural. Influência informal. Corrupção. Negócios internacionais. Jeitinho brasileiro.
topic Cross-cultural management. Informal influence. Corruptibility. International business. Brazilian jeitinho.
Gestión transcultural. Influencia informal. Corruptibilidad. Negocios internacionales. Brasileño jeitinho.
Gestão transcultural. Influência informal. Corrupção. Negócios internacionais. Jeitinho brasileiro.
description The Brazilian jeitinho and the Chinese guanxi are considered indigenous forms of informal influence. The first can be described as behavior tactics aimed at resolving social problems. The latter is broadly described as achieving goals through the use of social networks. These influence processes were chosen because they are commonly used in business negotiations in Brazil and China. Thus, understand their peculiarity is fundamental for the management of organizations involved in business in those two cultures. Therefore, we seek to determine whether such influence processes differ, as it is possible that a process said to be indigenous to a particular cultural context is in fact also to be found elsewhere. To investigate their uniqueness and the relationship between them, we conducted two studies. In both studies, participants rated representativeness, typicality and positivity of social scenarios, completed a 21-item version of the Schwartz’s Portrait Value Survey and a scale regarding attitudes towards corruption. Data were analyzed by a series of mean differences tests and stepwise regressions, separately for each nation, and the results are presented by sample. There were two samples: university students’ sample (with 266 Brazilian and 220 Chinese) and managers sample (with 101 Singapore Chinese and 246 Brazilian). Brazil scored significantly higher on Conservation and Self-Enhancement values when compared to China. Chinese respondents perceived the guanxi scenarios as more typical of what happens in China than the jeitinho scenarios, with a reverse pattern being observed for Brazilians. Although Brazilian respondents evaluated jeitinho less positively than Chinese respondents evaluated guanxi scenarios, Brazilians did not perceive jeitinho as more positive than guanxi. For the managers’ samples, it was observed that Brazilians had a significantly lower score on attitudes toward business corruptibility when compared to Chinese managers. Stepwise regressions suggest that positivity was linked with business corruptibility for the respective scenario type by nation.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica Descritiva
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/5432
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8898
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8899
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5657/8900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 4 (2015)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 4 (2015)
1678-6971
1518-6776
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1796794718821023744