Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
Texto Completo: | https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999 |
Resumo: | The sustainable development is entrenched. Your field is characterized by conflicting visions and interests that provide feedback for its fragmentation in two main ideological groups which oppose one another. In one trench are the biocentered, who advocate for the prioritization of natural resources preservation over socio-economic systems; the other trench is occupied by the antropocentered, moved by the belief that Nature exists to serve men and that market growth and technological evolution are enough to create sustainability. This loggerheads makes more difficult to construct a common vision for sustainable development, what results in slow advancement, if not in regress for a bigger equilibrium between economy, society and environment all over the world. Then there is the necessity to make the gap between these two vision smaller, so there is space to the construction of actions and politics towards a really viable sustainable development. That is this paper aim: to propose a new conceptual perspective for sustainable analyses and decision, which allows a closer approach of both visions. From a “general map”, where we track biocentered and antropocentered actors in opposite fields, we begin the construction of the conceptual model. The industrial ecology perspective is integrated to the stakeholders theory and to the Mauerhofer’s (2008) 3-D sustainability for the construction of it, which is conceived to reflect instrinsic sustainable development characteristics and it works as a closed circuit, retrofitted. This model fulfills this theoretical paper objective and is its main contribuition. We suggest the following advancements: (a) the model operation development and its ulterior application over the biocentered and antropocentered main demands, present in the diverse discussion forums; and (b) the model adaption to specific industries. |
id |
MACKENZIE_698f324ff174eacc1065f52a8a9f737a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/2999 |
network_acronym_str |
MACKENZIE |
network_name_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in SustainablitySaliendo de la Trinchera del Desarrollo Sostenible: un Nuevo Modelo para el Análisis y la Decisión SostenibleSaindo da Trincheira do Desenvolvimento Sustentável: uma Nova Perspectiva para a Análise e a Decisão em Sustentabilidadesustainable developmentanalitical and decision modelbiocenteredantropocenteredindustrial ecologydesarrollo sosteniblemodelo analítico e de decisiónbiocentradosantropocentradosecología industrialdesenvolvimento sustentávelmodelo analítico-decisóriobiocentradoantropocentradoThe sustainable development is entrenched. Your field is characterized by conflicting visions and interests that provide feedback for its fragmentation in two main ideological groups which oppose one another. In one trench are the biocentered, who advocate for the prioritization of natural resources preservation over socio-economic systems; the other trench is occupied by the antropocentered, moved by the belief that Nature exists to serve men and that market growth and technological evolution are enough to create sustainability. This loggerheads makes more difficult to construct a common vision for sustainable development, what results in slow advancement, if not in regress for a bigger equilibrium between economy, society and environment all over the world. Then there is the necessity to make the gap between these two vision smaller, so there is space to the construction of actions and politics towards a really viable sustainable development. That is this paper aim: to propose a new conceptual perspective for sustainable analyses and decision, which allows a closer approach of both visions. From a “general map”, where we track biocentered and antropocentered actors in opposite fields, we begin the construction of the conceptual model. The industrial ecology perspective is integrated to the stakeholders theory and to the Mauerhofer’s (2008) 3-D sustainability for the construction of it, which is conceived to reflect instrinsic sustainable development characteristics and it works as a closed circuit, retrofitted. This model fulfills this theoretical paper objective and is its main contribuition. We suggest the following advancements: (a) the model operation development and its ulterior application over the biocentered and antropocentered main demands, present in the diverse discussion forums; and (b) the model adaption to specific industries.El desarrollo sostenible está en una trinchera. Su campo está marcado por las visiones e intereses contrapuestos que pasan a engrosar la fragmentación del tema en dos grandes grupos ideológicos que se oponen. En una trinchera están los biocentrados, abogando por el establecimiento de prioridades de conservación de los recursos naturales en los sistemas socio-económicos, y la otra trinchera está ocupada por los antropocentricos, impulsados por la creencia de que la naturaleza existe para servir al hombre y que el crecimiento de los mercados y mejora de la tecnología son suficientes para generar la sostenibilidad. Este contraste hace que sea difícil de construir una visión compartida para el desarrollo sostenible, dando como resultado un avance lento, cuando no a la inversa en la búsqueda de un mejor equilibrio entre economía, sociedad y medio ambiente en todo el mundo. Luego está la necesidad de cerrar la brecha entre estos dos puntos de vista, por lo que hay espacio para la construcción de acciones y políticas de desarrollo sostenible realmente viable. Este es el objetivo de este estudio teórico: proponer una perspectiva conceptual para el análisis y la toma sostenible, lo que permite un mayor acercamiento de estos dos puntos de vista. Desde un "mapa general", que localiza biocéntrica y antropocéntrica en campos opuestos, se inicia la construcción de una proposición analítica de un modelo conceptual de decisiones. La perspectiva de la ecología industrial se integra en la teoría de los stakeholders y la sostenibilidad 3-D del Mauerhofer (2008) para la construcción de esta propuesta, que está diseñada para reflejar las características intrínsecas del desarrollo sostenible y trabaja en la forma de un circuito cerrado, la retroalimentación. Este modelo responde al propósito de este ensayo teórico y su principal contribución. Se propone como un estudio de futuro: (a) el desarrollo operativo y posterior aplicación de este modelo en los principales argumentos presentes biocéntrica y antropocéntrica en los foros de discusión diferentes; y (b) adaptarlo a industrias específicas.O desenvolvimento sustentável está entrincheirado. Seu campo é marcado por visões e interesses conflitantes que retroalimentam a fragmentação da temática em dois principais grupos ideológicos que se opõem. Em uma trincheira estão os biocentrados, que advogam pela priorização da preservação dos recursos naturais sobre os sistemas sócio-econômicos; a outra trincheira é ocupada pelos antropocentrados, movidos pelas crenças de que a Natureza existe para servir ao homem e de que o crescimento dos mercados e o incremento tecnológico são suficientes para gerar sustentabilidade. Esta contraposição dificulta a construção de uma visão conjunta para o desenvolvimento sustentável, o que resulta no avanço lento, quando não no retrocesso na busca por um maior equilíbrio entre economia, sociedade e meio-ambiente ao redor do mundo. Há então a necessidade de diminuir a distância entre estas duas visões, de forma que haja espaço para a construção de ações e políticas de um desenvolvimento sustentável realmente viável. Este é o objetivo deste ensaio teórico: propor uma nova perspectiva conceitual de análise e decisão sustentáveis, que permita uma maior aproximação destas duas visões. A partir de um “mapa geral”, que localiza biocentrados e antropocentrados em campos opostos, inicia-se a construção de uma proposição de modelo conceitual analítico- decisório. A perspectiva da ecologia industrial é integrada à teoria dos stakeholders e à sustentabilidade 3-D de Mauerhofer (2008) para a construção desta proposição, que é concebida de forma a refletir características intrínsecas do desenvolvimento sustentável e funciona na forma de um circuito fechado, retroalimentado. Este modelo atende ao objetivo deste ensaio teórico e é sua principal contribuição. Sugere-se como estudos futuros: (a) desenvolvimento operacional e a posterior aplicação deste modelo sobre os principais argumentos de biocentrados e antropocentrados presentes nos diversos foros de discussão; (b) desenvolvimento e a adaptação do mesmo a indústrias específicas; e (c) aprimoramento do modelo conceitual de modo a torná-lo mais operativo.Editora Mackenzie2012-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPesquisa Teóricaapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.ms-excelapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentationapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentationapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentationapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentationapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentationapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2013)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2013)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 14 n. 1 (2013)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEporhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/3945https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8387https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8388https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8389https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8390https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8391https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8392https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8393https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8394Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBittencourt Marconatto, Diego AntonioTrevisan, MarceloZonin, Valdecir JoséPedrozo, Eugenio AvilaSaggin, Kleiton2015-06-25T00:07:39Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/2999Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2015-06-25T00:07:39RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity Saliendo de la Trinchera del Desarrollo Sostenible: un Nuevo Modelo para el Análisis y la Decisión Sostenible Saindo da Trincheira do Desenvolvimento Sustentável: uma Nova Perspectiva para a Análise e a Decisão em Sustentabilidade |
title |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
spellingShingle |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity Bittencourt Marconatto, Diego Antonio sustainable development analitical and decision model biocentered antropocentered industrial ecology desarrollo sostenible modelo analítico e de decisión biocentrados antropocentrados ecología industrial desenvolvimento sustentável modelo analítico-decisório biocentrado antropocentrado |
title_short |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
title_full |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
title_fullStr |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
title_sort |
Coming out the Sustainable Development Trench: a New Perspective for Analyses and Decision in Sustainablity |
author |
Bittencourt Marconatto, Diego Antonio |
author_facet |
Bittencourt Marconatto, Diego Antonio Trevisan, Marcelo Zonin, Valdecir José Pedrozo, Eugenio Avila Saggin, Kleiton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Trevisan, Marcelo Zonin, Valdecir José Pedrozo, Eugenio Avila Saggin, Kleiton |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bittencourt Marconatto, Diego Antonio Trevisan, Marcelo Zonin, Valdecir José Pedrozo, Eugenio Avila Saggin, Kleiton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sustainable development analitical and decision model biocentered antropocentered industrial ecology desarrollo sostenible modelo analítico e de decisión biocentrados antropocentrados ecología industrial desenvolvimento sustentável modelo analítico-decisório biocentrado antropocentrado |
topic |
sustainable development analitical and decision model biocentered antropocentered industrial ecology desarrollo sostenible modelo analítico e de decisión biocentrados antropocentrados ecología industrial desenvolvimento sustentável modelo analítico-decisório biocentrado antropocentrado |
description |
The sustainable development is entrenched. Your field is characterized by conflicting visions and interests that provide feedback for its fragmentation in two main ideological groups which oppose one another. In one trench are the biocentered, who advocate for the prioritization of natural resources preservation over socio-economic systems; the other trench is occupied by the antropocentered, moved by the belief that Nature exists to serve men and that market growth and technological evolution are enough to create sustainability. This loggerheads makes more difficult to construct a common vision for sustainable development, what results in slow advancement, if not in regress for a bigger equilibrium between economy, society and environment all over the world. Then there is the necessity to make the gap between these two vision smaller, so there is space to the construction of actions and politics towards a really viable sustainable development. That is this paper aim: to propose a new conceptual perspective for sustainable analyses and decision, which allows a closer approach of both visions. From a “general map”, where we track biocentered and antropocentered actors in opposite fields, we begin the construction of the conceptual model. The industrial ecology perspective is integrated to the stakeholders theory and to the Mauerhofer’s (2008) 3-D sustainability for the construction of it, which is conceived to reflect instrinsic sustainable development characteristics and it works as a closed circuit, retrofitted. This model fulfills this theoretical paper objective and is its main contribuition. We suggest the following advancements: (a) the model operation development and its ulterior application over the biocentered and antropocentered main demands, present in the diverse discussion forums; and (b) the model adaption to specific industries. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Pesquisa Teórica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999 |
url |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/3945 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8387 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8388 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8389 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8390 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8391 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8392 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8393 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/2999/8394 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.ms-excel application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2013) Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2013) Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 14 n. 1 (2013) 1678-6971 1518-6776 reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) instacron:MACKENZIE |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
instacron_str |
MACKENZIE |
institution |
MACKENZIE |
reponame_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
collection |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.adm@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1813820670641963008 |