Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Lílian Carneiro
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Rachid, Alessandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968
Resumo: Purpose: This paper presents an overview of the adoption of methods of production management for auto parts  companies in Brazil and the involvement of shop floor workers in their use, taking into consideration the significance of involvement for organizational performance and obtaining the results expected from the adoption of these methods, in line with research on participatory management and the manuals in the area of operations. Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Involvement is a significant construct in product management and has been widely researched, but little research has been dedicated to investigating the involvement of employees in the use of multiple methods. Most of the existing research concentrates analysis on the adoption of only one method in isolation and in the literature it has been observed that companies do not always follow the recommendation to involve workers in their use, thus motivating this study. Key methodological aspects: We conducted a survey in 95 auto parts companies to gain access to information about a wide range of companies, plotting an overview of the production management methods adopted and examining the extent of the involvement of employees.Summary of key results: Most of methods investigated were widely adopted by the companies surveyed. Generally, the companies surveyed responded that there is employee involvement, although this varies from one method to another. The study identified cases in which methods have been adopted and after some time have ceased to be used by some companies. The abandonment of Six Sigma occurred mainly in companies in which there was no involvement of employees in the application of this method. The method most commonly abandoned, however, was the suggestion program, despite exhibiting greater employee involvement, indicating that some companies continue to experience difficulty applying this type of method over time. Limited time for training may also have hampered the use of some methods.Key considerations/conclusions: The research presents a panorama of the main production management methods adopted in a large number of auto parts companies and investigates the involvement of employees in their use. The use of a survey, however, means that it has not been possible to obtain additional information about the use of these methods by workers, or to explore the reasons that led to the abandonment of some methods. It would be interesting to research these aspects in more in-depth case studies.
id MACKENZIE_8de458aab1b4d2b0666d814639092b09
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/7968
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts CompaniesGestión de la Producción y Trabajadores - Una Encuesta en Empresas de AutopartesGestão da Produção e Trabalhadores - Um Survey em Empresas de AutopeçasProduction management. Workers´ involvement. Management methods. Auto parts. Survey.Gestión de la producción. Implicación de los trabajadores. Métodos de gestión. Autopartes. Encuesta.Gestão da produção. Envolvimento dos trabalhadores. Métodos de gestão. Autopeças. Survey.Purpose: This paper presents an overview of the adoption of methods of production management for auto parts  companies in Brazil and the involvement of shop floor workers in their use, taking into consideration the significance of involvement for organizational performance and obtaining the results expected from the adoption of these methods, in line with research on participatory management and the manuals in the area of operations. Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Involvement is a significant construct in product management and has been widely researched, but little research has been dedicated to investigating the involvement of employees in the use of multiple methods. Most of the existing research concentrates analysis on the adoption of only one method in isolation and in the literature it has been observed that companies do not always follow the recommendation to involve workers in their use, thus motivating this study. Key methodological aspects: We conducted a survey in 95 auto parts companies to gain access to information about a wide range of companies, plotting an overview of the production management methods adopted and examining the extent of the involvement of employees.Summary of key results: Most of methods investigated were widely adopted by the companies surveyed. Generally, the companies surveyed responded that there is employee involvement, although this varies from one method to another. The study identified cases in which methods have been adopted and after some time have ceased to be used by some companies. The abandonment of Six Sigma occurred mainly in companies in which there was no involvement of employees in the application of this method. The method most commonly abandoned, however, was the suggestion program, despite exhibiting greater employee involvement, indicating that some companies continue to experience difficulty applying this type of method over time. Limited time for training may also have hampered the use of some methods.Key considerations/conclusions: The research presents a panorama of the main production management methods adopted in a large number of auto parts companies and investigates the involvement of employees in their use. The use of a survey, however, means that it has not been possible to obtain additional information about the use of these methods by workers, or to explore the reasons that led to the abandonment of some methods. It would be interesting to research these aspects in more in-depth case studies.Objetivo: Presentar una visión general de la adopción de métodos de gestión de la producción en empresas de autopartes en Brasil y si hay participación de los trabajadores de la fábrica en su uso, teniendo en cuenta la relevancia de la participación al desempeño de la organización y el logro de los resultados esperados por la adopción de estos métodos, como señala la investigación sobre la gestión participativa y los manuales de la área de gestión de operaciones.Originalidad/Laguna/Relevancia/Implicaciones: La participación es un tema relevante y ampliamente investigado, pero se han identificado pocos estudios dedicados a comprobar si hay la participación de los trabajadores en el uso de un conjunto más amplio de métodos. La mayor parte de las investigaciónes identificadas centra su análisis en la adopción de un único método y, en éstas, ya hay indicios de que las empresas no siempre siguen las recomendaciones de la participación de los trabajadores en su uso, lo que llevó a la realización de esta investigación.Principales aspectos metodológicos: Se realizó una encuesta en 95 empresas de autopartes para acceder a la información sobre una gran cantidad de empresas de autopartes, dar una visión general acerca de los métodos de gestión de la producción adoptados y averiguar en qué empresas son trabajadores implicados. Síntesis de los principales resultados: La mayoría de los métodos investigados han sido ampliamente desplegados por las empresas encuestadas. La mayoría de las empresas encuestadas respondieron que hay implicación de los trabajadores, aunque esto varía de un método a otro. Hay casos de métodos que se han desplegado y, después de un tiempo, ya no se usa por algunas empresas. El abandono de Six Sigma se produjo principalmente en empresas en las que no hubo participación de los empleados en su uso. El método más abandonado, sin embargo, fue el programa de sugerencias el método en el que hay más implicación de los trabajadores, lo que indica que este tipo de método todavía se enfrenta a dificultades para seguir siendo utilizado a través del tiempo en algunas empresas. El poco tiempo de entrenamiento también puede haber impedido el uso de ciertos métodos.Principales consideraciones/conclusiones: Los métodos encuestados han sido ampliamente aplicadas por las empresas encuestadas. La investigación confirma que la calidad sigue teniendo un papel central en lo que respecta a la implicación de los trabajadores, lo que representa uno de los aspectos más llamativos de la influencia de la producción Lean. La mayor parte de los entreniamentos mencionada se orienta a esta área, pero el tiempo de entrenamiento es corto, lo que ayuda a explicar la dificultad de participar en los métodos que requieren un mayor nivel de capacitación formal. Se han observado casos de empresas que han implementado ciertos métodos, pero dejaram de usarlos, destacando el programa de sugerencias, donde la participación de los trabajadores es fundamental. Esto indica que las dificultades relacionados con esta participación se mantienen en algunas empresas.Objetivo: Apresentar um panorama da adoção de métodos de gestão da produção por empresas de autopeças no Brasil e se há o envolvimento dos trabalhadores da fábrica na sua utilização, considerando a relevância do envolvimento para o desempenho organizacional e para a obtenção dos resultados esperados pela adoção desses métodos, como apontado por pesquisas sobre gestão participativa e pelos manuais da área de gestão de operações.Originalidade/Lacuna/Relevância/Implicações: O envolvimento é um tema relevante e amplamente pesquisado, mas foram identificadas poucas pesquisas dedicadas a verificar se há o envolvimento dos trabalhadores na utilização de um conjunto mais amplo de métodos. A maior parte das pesquisas identificadas concentra sua análise sobre a adoção de apenas um método de forma isolada e, nestas, já se observam indícios de que as empresas nem sempre seguem as recomendações de envolver os trabalhadores em sua utilização, o que motivou a realização dessa pesquisa.Principais aspectos metodológicos: Foi realizado um survey em 95 empresas de autopeças para ter acesso a informações sobre uma grande quantidade de empresas de autopeças e traçar um panorama quanto aos métodos de gestão da produção adotados e verificar em quais há o envolvimento dos trabalhadores.Síntese dos principais resultados: A maior parte dos métodos investigados tem sido amplamente implantada pelas empresas pesquisadas. Em sua maioria, as empresas pesquisadas responderam que há o envolvimento dos trabalhadores, embora isto varie de um método para outro. Foram identificados casos de métodos que foram implantados e, depois de algum tempo, deixaram de ser utilizados por algumas empresas. O abandono do Seis Sigma ocorreu principalmente em empresas nas quais não havia o envolvimento dos trabalhadores em sua utilização. O método mais abandonado, no entanto, foi o programa de sugestões, justamente aquele em que foi apontado o maior envolvimento, o que indica que este tipo de método ainda enfrenta dificuldades para continuar sendo utilizado ao longo do tempo em algumas empresas. O pouco tempo de treinamento também pode ter prejudicado a utilização de alguns métodos.Principais considerações/conclusões: Os métodos pesquisados têm sido implantados pelas empresas pesquisadas. A pesquisa confirma que a qualidade continua tendo um papel central no que diz respeito ao envolvimento dos trabalhadores, representando um dos aspectos mais marcantes da influência da produção enxuta. A maior parte dos treinamentos mencionados é voltada para esta área, mas o tempo de treinamento é curto, o que ajuda a explicar a dificuldade de envolvimento em métodos que requerem maior nível de treinamento formal. Foram observados casos de empresas que implantaram certos métodos, mas depois deixaram de usá-los, destacando-se o programa de sugestões, no qual o envolvimento dos trabalhadores é central, o que indica que persistem dificuldades relacionadas a esse envolvimento em algumas empresas.Editora Mackenzie2016-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesSurveyapplication/pdfapplication/x-zipapplication/x-zipapplication/x-zipapplication/x-zipapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2016)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 2 (2016)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEengporhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/5602https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9372https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9373https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9374https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9375https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9638https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9639https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9640https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9641https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9642https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9643https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9644https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9645https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9646https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9647https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9648https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9649Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Lílian CarneiroRachid, Alessandra2016-04-20T19:28:23Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/7968Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:01:03.495601RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
Gestión de la Producción y Trabajadores - Una Encuesta en Empresas de Autopartes
Gestão da Produção e Trabalhadores - Um Survey em Empresas de Autopeças
title Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
spellingShingle Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
Souza, Lílian Carneiro
Production management. Workers´ involvement. Management methods. Auto parts. Survey.
Gestión de la producción. Implicación de los trabajadores. Métodos de gestión. Autopartes. Encuesta.
Gestão da produção. Envolvimento dos trabalhadores. Métodos de gestão. Autopeças. Survey.
title_short Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
title_full Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
title_fullStr Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
title_full_unstemmed Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
title_sort Production Management and Employees – A Survey of Automotive Parts Companies
author Souza, Lílian Carneiro
author_facet Souza, Lílian Carneiro
Rachid, Alessandra
author_role author
author2 Rachid, Alessandra
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Lílian Carneiro
Rachid, Alessandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Production management. Workers´ involvement. Management methods. Auto parts. Survey.
Gestión de la producción. Implicación de los trabajadores. Métodos de gestión. Autopartes. Encuesta.
Gestão da produção. Envolvimento dos trabalhadores. Métodos de gestão. Autopeças. Survey.
topic Production management. Workers´ involvement. Management methods. Auto parts. Survey.
Gestión de la producción. Implicación de los trabajadores. Métodos de gestión. Autopartes. Encuesta.
Gestão da produção. Envolvimento dos trabalhadores. Métodos de gestão. Autopeças. Survey.
description Purpose: This paper presents an overview of the adoption of methods of production management for auto parts  companies in Brazil and the involvement of shop floor workers in their use, taking into consideration the significance of involvement for organizational performance and obtaining the results expected from the adoption of these methods, in line with research on participatory management and the manuals in the area of operations. Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Involvement is a significant construct in product management and has been widely researched, but little research has been dedicated to investigating the involvement of employees in the use of multiple methods. Most of the existing research concentrates analysis on the adoption of only one method in isolation and in the literature it has been observed that companies do not always follow the recommendation to involve workers in their use, thus motivating this study. Key methodological aspects: We conducted a survey in 95 auto parts companies to gain access to information about a wide range of companies, plotting an overview of the production management methods adopted and examining the extent of the involvement of employees.Summary of key results: Most of methods investigated were widely adopted by the companies surveyed. Generally, the companies surveyed responded that there is employee involvement, although this varies from one method to another. The study identified cases in which methods have been adopted and after some time have ceased to be used by some companies. The abandonment of Six Sigma occurred mainly in companies in which there was no involvement of employees in the application of this method. The method most commonly abandoned, however, was the suggestion program, despite exhibiting greater employee involvement, indicating that some companies continue to experience difficulty applying this type of method over time. Limited time for training may also have hampered the use of some methods.Key considerations/conclusions: The research presents a panorama of the main production management methods adopted in a large number of auto parts companies and investigates the involvement of employees in their use. The use of a survey, however, means that it has not been possible to obtain additional information about the use of these methods by workers, or to explore the reasons that led to the abandonment of some methods. It would be interesting to research these aspects in more in-depth case studies.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Survey
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/5602
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9372
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9373
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9374
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9375
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9638
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9639
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9640
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9641
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9642
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9643
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9644
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9645
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9646
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9647
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9648
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/7968/9649
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/x-zip
application/x-zip
application/x-zip
application/x-zip
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2016)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 2 (2016)
1678-6971
1518-6776
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1796794719518326785