Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
Texto Completo: | https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831 |
Resumo: | This bibliometric study aims to present a characterization of international research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), from the analysis of the articles published in the period 2002 to 2012, in major international journals in the areas of Management and Psychology. The choice of literature analyzed is considered one of the key points of the bibliometric analysis, so the selection criteria involved the cataloging by Journal Citation Report (JCR). For each area searched, Management and Psychology Applied, selected the three journals with the highest impact factors (FI) and elected the three most significant journals common to both areas. Then, was the choice of keywords, which characterize a first filter to select articles. In the second stage, the pre-selected texts were read in full and nine were dropped from the initial set of 157 articles, since it was evident that dealt with issues not related to the specific approach of the OCB. In this way, a total of 148 articles constituted the universe of analysis, which, in the third stage, were analyzed based on a script developed specifically for this study. Through this analysis, it was the recognition of the importance of the OCB, since there are a significant number of investigations on the topic and a growth in production, mainly in the years 2010 and 2011. It was found to predominance of empirical articles, having as object the analysis the individuals. With regard to the method, there was a higher incidence of quantitative research, the type survey, and the models of Williams and Anderson (1991) and Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, and Fetter (1990) the most widely used. The OCB was associated mainly with Organizational Justice and Leadership. However, it was also found that the majority of articles, by using descriptive and quantitative research, analyzes deepened not envision a better understanding about the subject, suggesting the need for expansion of studies. As for the limits of the study cites, in particular, its scope. So, in order to expand this research, it is suggested to carry out a survey of nation studies. |
id |
MACKENZIE_da7ea411bb6bbf33fab070a951a6afd9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5831 |
network_acronym_str |
MACKENZIE |
network_name_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional: Caracterización de la Producción Científica Internacional en el Período 2002-2012Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional: Caracterização da Produção Científica Internacional no Período de 2002 a 2012Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Bibliometric Study. International Scientific Production. Management. Psychology.Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional. Estudio Bibliométrico. Producción Científica Internacional. Administración. Psicología.Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional. Estudo Bibliométrico. Produção Científica Internacional. Administração. Psicologia.This bibliometric study aims to present a characterization of international research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), from the analysis of the articles published in the period 2002 to 2012, in major international journals in the areas of Management and Psychology. The choice of literature analyzed is considered one of the key points of the bibliometric analysis, so the selection criteria involved the cataloging by Journal Citation Report (JCR). For each area searched, Management and Psychology Applied, selected the three journals with the highest impact factors (FI) and elected the three most significant journals common to both areas. Then, was the choice of keywords, which characterize a first filter to select articles. In the second stage, the pre-selected texts were read in full and nine were dropped from the initial set of 157 articles, since it was evident that dealt with issues not related to the specific approach of the OCB. In this way, a total of 148 articles constituted the universe of analysis, which, in the third stage, were analyzed based on a script developed specifically for this study. Through this analysis, it was the recognition of the importance of the OCB, since there are a significant number of investigations on the topic and a growth in production, mainly in the years 2010 and 2011. It was found to predominance of empirical articles, having as object the analysis the individuals. With regard to the method, there was a higher incidence of quantitative research, the type survey, and the models of Williams and Anderson (1991) and Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, and Fetter (1990) the most widely used. The OCB was associated mainly with Organizational Justice and Leadership. However, it was also found that the majority of articles, by using descriptive and quantitative research, analyzes deepened not envision a better understanding about the subject, suggesting the need for expansion of studies. As for the limits of the study cites, in particular, its scope. So, in order to expand this research, it is suggested to carry out a survey of nation studies.Este estudio bibliométrico presenta una caracterización de la investigación internacional sobre el comportamiento de ciudadanía organizacional (CCO), desde el análisis de los artículos publicados en el período 2002-2012, en importantes revistas internacionales en las áreas de Administración y Psicología. La elección de la literatura es considerada uno de los puntos clave del análisis bibliométrico, así los criterios de selección implicó la catalogación por Journal Citation Report (JCR). Para búsquedas en cada área, Administración (Management) y Psicología (Psychology Applied), seleccionado las tres revistas con los más altos factores de impacto (FI) y elegido las tres revistas más importantes comunes a ambas áreas. Entonces, se deja a la elección de palabras clave, que cuentan con un primero filtro para la selección de los artículos. En la segunda etapa, los textos preseleccionados fueron leídos en su totalidad y nueve fueron retirados de lo conjunto inicial de 157 artículos. De esta manera, un total de 148 artículos constituyen el universo de análisis, que, en la tercera fase, se analizaron basados en un guión desarrollado específicamente para este estudio. A través de este análisis fue el reconocimiento de la importancia de lo CCO, puesto que hay un número significativo de investigaciones sobre el tema y un crecimiento en la producción, principalmente en los años 2010 y 2011. Fue encontrado el predominio de artículos empíricos, teniendo como objeto de análisis los individuos. En relación al método, hubo una mayor incidencia de investigación cuantitativa, el tipo survey, el modelos Williams y Anderson (1991) y Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, y Fetter (1990) el más ampliamente utilizado. El CCO fue asociado, principalmente, a los temas Justicia Organizacional y Liderazgo. Sin embargo, fue encontrado que la mayoría de los artículos, mediante el uso de investigaciones descriptivas y cuantitativas, no profundizó el análisis con una mayor comprensión sobre el tema, lo que sugiere la necesidad de ampliación de estudios. En cuanto a los límites del estudio se cita, en particular, su ámbito de aplicación. Así que, para ampliar esta investigación, se sugiere para llevar a cabo un levantamiento de estudios nacionales.Este estudo bibliométrico se propõe a apresentar uma caracterização das pesquisas internacionais sobre o tema Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional (CCO), a partir da análise dos artigos publicados no período de 2002 a 2012, nos principais periódicos internacionais das áreas de Administração e Psicologia. A escolha da literatura analisada é um dos pontos-chave da análise bibliométrica, assim o critério de seleção envolveu a catalogação pelo Journal Citation Report (JCR). Para cada área pesquisada, Administração (Management) e Psicologia (Psychology Applied), selecionaram-se os três periódicos com maiores fatores de impacto (FI) e elegeram-se também os três periódicos mais significativos comuns às duas áreas. Em seguida, partiu-se para a escolha das palavras-chave, que caracterizam um primeiro filtro para a seleção dos artigos. No segundo estágio, os textos pré-selecionados foram lidos integralmente e nove foram descartados do conjunto inicial de 157 artigos, uma vez que ficou evidente que versavam de assuntos não relacionados com a abordagem específica dos CCO. Dessa forma, um total de 148 artigos constituiu o universo de análise, os quais, no terceiro estágio, foram analisados com base em um roteiro desenvolvido especialmente para este estudo. Por meio desta análise, constatou-se o reconhecimento da importância dos CCO, pois há um número significativo de investigações sobre o tema e, ainda, um crescimento da produção, principalmente, nos anos 2010 e 2011. Verificou-se a predominância de artigos empíricos, tendo como objeto de análise os indivíduos. Em relação ao método, houve a maior incidência de pesquisas quantitativas, do tipo survey, sendo os modelos de Williams e Anderson (1991) e de Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, e Fetter (1990) os mais utilizados. O CCO foi associado, principalmente, aos temas Justiça Organizacional e Liderança. O panorama dos estudos internacionais sobre o tema apontou a relevância do CCO, tanto no âmbito acadêmico, quanto no contexto das organizações. No entanto, apurou-se também que a maioria dos artigos, por utilizarem pesquisas descritivas e quantitativas, não aprofundaram análises que vislumbram a maior compreensão acerca da temática, sugerindo a necessidade de ampliação dos estudos. Quanto aos limites do estudo cita-se, principalmente, a sua abrangência. Assim, visando ampliar esta pesquisa, sugere-se a realização de um levantamento dos estudos nacionais. Editora Mackenzie2014-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesEstudo Bibliométricoapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 2 (2015)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEporhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/5288https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8925https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8926https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8927https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8928https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8929https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8930https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8931https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8932https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8933https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8934Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCOSTA, VÍVIAN FLORESDE ANDRADE, TAÍS2015-04-22T22:08:29Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5831Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2015-04-22T22:08:29RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional: Caracterización de la Producción Científica Internacional en el Período 2002-2012 Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional: Caracterização da Produção Científica Internacional no Período de 2002 a 2012 |
title |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 COSTA, VÍVIAN FLORES Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Bibliometric Study. International Scientific Production. Management. Psychology. Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional. Estudio Bibliométrico. Producción Científica Internacional. Administración. Psicología. Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional. Estudo Bibliométrico. Produção Científica Internacional. Administração. Psicologia. |
title_short |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
title_full |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
title_fullStr |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
title_sort |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Characterization of International Scientific Production in the Period 2002 to 2012 |
author |
COSTA, VÍVIAN FLORES |
author_facet |
COSTA, VÍVIAN FLORES DE ANDRADE, TAÍS |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
DE ANDRADE, TAÍS |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
COSTA, VÍVIAN FLORES DE ANDRADE, TAÍS |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Bibliometric Study. International Scientific Production. Management. Psychology. Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional. Estudio Bibliométrico. Producción Científica Internacional. Administración. Psicología. Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional. Estudo Bibliométrico. Produção Científica Internacional. Administração. Psicologia. |
topic |
Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Bibliometric Study. International Scientific Production. Management. Psychology. Comportamiento de Ciudadanía Organizacional. Estudio Bibliométrico. Producción Científica Internacional. Administración. Psicología. Comportamento de Cidadania Organizacional. Estudo Bibliométrico. Produção Científica Internacional. Administração. Psicologia. |
description |
This bibliometric study aims to present a characterization of international research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), from the analysis of the articles published in the period 2002 to 2012, in major international journals in the areas of Management and Psychology. The choice of literature analyzed is considered one of the key points of the bibliometric analysis, so the selection criteria involved the cataloging by Journal Citation Report (JCR). For each area searched, Management and Psychology Applied, selected the three journals with the highest impact factors (FI) and elected the three most significant journals common to both areas. Then, was the choice of keywords, which characterize a first filter to select articles. In the second stage, the pre-selected texts were read in full and nine were dropped from the initial set of 157 articles, since it was evident that dealt with issues not related to the specific approach of the OCB. In this way, a total of 148 articles constituted the universe of analysis, which, in the third stage, were analyzed based on a script developed specifically for this study. Through this analysis, it was the recognition of the importance of the OCB, since there are a significant number of investigations on the topic and a growth in production, mainly in the years 2010 and 2011. It was found to predominance of empirical articles, having as object the analysis the individuals. With regard to the method, there was a higher incidence of quantitative research, the type survey, and the models of Williams and Anderson (1991) and Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, and Fetter (1990) the most widely used. The OCB was associated mainly with Organizational Justice and Leadership. However, it was also found that the majority of articles, by using descriptive and quantitative research, analyzes deepened not envision a better understanding about the subject, suggesting the need for expansion of studies. As for the limits of the study cites, in particular, its scope. So, in order to expand this research, it is suggested to carry out a survey of nation studies. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Estudo Bibliométrico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831 |
url |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/5288 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8925 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8926 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8927 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8928 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8929 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8930 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8931 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8932 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8933 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5831/8934 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015) Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2015) Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 2 (2015) 1678-6971 1518-6776 reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) instacron:MACKENZIE |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
instacron_str |
MACKENZIE |
institution |
MACKENZIE |
reponame_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
collection |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.adm@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1813820671610847232 |