Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Versiani, Angela França
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Oribe, Claudemir Yoschihiro, Rrezende, Sergio Fernando Loureiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200
Resumo: This article aims to assess the degree to which formal practices introduced in work environment contribute to organizational learning. The theoretical background recognizes that companies adapt to the environmental by individual knowledge absorption in collective properties. This knowledge is incorporated in organizational practices. At the moment companies deal to changing environmental they need to exploit current resources, explore new ones and turn into their practices. Such flow is called by organizational learning.The systematic problem-solving method is considered as one of most recommended formal practices to promote organizational learning. However if the one side there is the valuation of such method on the other hand the literature needs its critical evaluation. In other words, there are a few empirical evidences that assess the real contribution of this method to promote organizational learning. Thus there is a gap between recommendation for its use and theoretical underpinning of such suggestion. This article asks in what measure the systematic problem-solving method contribute to organizational learning. This question is important to highlight its effects over the organizations that employ it.Thus the research focus on MASP, one of the systematic problem-solving method more release in Brazil. To do so, it was considered that organizational learning is composed by four dimensions: knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. It was conducted a survey with three different organization. The analyses have been focused on how MASP is related to the four dimension of organizational learning. More specifically, it was identified what dimension and the type of organizational learning that are supported by MASP.The statistical tests pointed out that the using of MASP contributed to learning at all organizational dimension, such as knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. However, this learning was restricted to corrections in routines, which means that the method itself was not able to trigger learning at deeper levels. In reality, the depth of learning seemed to be correlated to the contextual factors in organizations.
id MACKENZIE_e368dcf7afca82ab8898f375ce705dd4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/3200
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work EnvironmentLa Aprendizaje de las Organizaciones Generada por las Prácticas Formales en el Lugar de TrabajoA Aprendizagem das Organizações Gerada pelas Práticas Formais no Ambiente de Trabalhoaprendizagem organizacionalpráticas formais de aprendizagemMASPmétodo de solução sistemática de problemasaprendizagem no ambiente de trabalho.This article aims to assess the degree to which formal practices introduced in work environment contribute to organizational learning. The theoretical background recognizes that companies adapt to the environmental by individual knowledge absorption in collective properties. This knowledge is incorporated in organizational practices. At the moment companies deal to changing environmental they need to exploit current resources, explore new ones and turn into their practices. Such flow is called by organizational learning.The systematic problem-solving method is considered as one of most recommended formal practices to promote organizational learning. However if the one side there is the valuation of such method on the other hand the literature needs its critical evaluation. In other words, there are a few empirical evidences that assess the real contribution of this method to promote organizational learning. Thus there is a gap between recommendation for its use and theoretical underpinning of such suggestion. This article asks in what measure the systematic problem-solving method contribute to organizational learning. This question is important to highlight its effects over the organizations that employ it.Thus the research focus on MASP, one of the systematic problem-solving method more release in Brazil. To do so, it was considered that organizational learning is composed by four dimensions: knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. It was conducted a survey with three different organization. The analyses have been focused on how MASP is related to the four dimension of organizational learning. More specifically, it was identified what dimension and the type of organizational learning that are supported by MASP.The statistical tests pointed out that the using of MASP contributed to learning at all organizational dimension, such as knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. However, this learning was restricted to corrections in routines, which means that the method itself was not able to trigger learning at deeper levels. In reality, the depth of learning seemed to be correlated to the contextual factors in organizations. Este artículo tiene como objetivo evaluar el grado en que las prácticas formales establecidas en el lugar de trabajo contribuye al aprendizaje organizacional. Para este análisis se eligió el método de análisis de la resolución sistemática de problemas, considerado en la literatura como una de las prácticas más recomendadas. Por un lado, está la exaltación de un método para generar el aprendizaje, por el contrario, la literatura sufre su evaluación crítica. Es decir, se observa que hay escasez de investigación empírica que tiene por objeto determinar la contribución real del método para promover el aprendizaje organizacional. Por lo tanto, existe una brecha entre las recomendaciones y que la teoría de tales recomendaciones. Este artículo de preguntar, ¿hasta qué punto los métodos de resolución sistemática de problemas contribuyen al aprendizaje organizacional, tiene la principal contribución aclarar los efectos de estos métodos a las organizaciones que lo utilizan. Así que se centró el MASP, uno de los métodos de resolución sistemática de problemas más extendida en Brasil y en el extranjero. Para hacer esta evaluación es parte del marco teórico del aprendizaje organizacional se compone de cuatro dimensiones: La adquisición de conocimientos, de distribución y La interpretación de La información y La memoria de La organización. Demostró teóricamente, la tesis de que el MASP es uno de los mecanismos que generan el aprendizaje en todas las dimensiones de la organización que tratan de comprobar empíricamente, a través de una encuesta cuantitativa con tres organizaciones diferentes. Los análisis estadísticos mostraron que el uso del MASP contribuye a todos los niveles de aprendizaje organizacional. Sin embargo este aprendizaje a menudo se tiende a limitarse a las reparaciones de rutina, lo que significa que el uso del método en sí no es capaz de generar un aprendizaje más profundo. La profundidad del aprendizaje parece correlacionarse con más fuerza con los factores contextuales en las organizaciones.   Resumo: O presente artigo tem por objetivo avaliar em que medida práticas formais instituídas no ambiente de trabalho contribuem para a aprendizagem organizacional. Para tal análise escolheu-se o método de análise de solução sistemática de problemas, considerado na literatura como uma das práticas formais mais recomendadas .Se por um lado, constata-se a exaltação de tal método para gerar aprendizado, por outro, a literatura ressente de sua avaliação crítica. Isto é, observa-se que há escassez de pesquisa empírica que visa verificar a real contribuição do método de solução sistemática de problemas em promover a aprendizagem organizacional. Desse modo, verifica-se uma lacuna entre recomendações práticas e sustentação teórica de tais recomendações. Este artigo ao indagar, em que medida os métodos de solução sistemática de problemas contribuem para a aprendizagem organizacional, tem por principal contribuição esclarecer os seus efeitos sobre as organizações que o utilizam. Assim, focalizou-se o MASP , um dos métodos de solução sistemática de problemas mais difundidos no Brasil e no exterior. Para proceder tal avaliação, parte-se do referencial teórico que concebe a aprendizagem organizacional como um ciclo de conversão do conhecimento do nível individual para o da organização, demonstrando como tal ciclo é articulado pelas fases de aplicação do MASP. Demonstrada teoricamente, a proposição de que o MASP é um dos mecanismos capazes de gerar aprendizado nos diversos níveis da organização, busca-se verificá-la empiricamente, mediante uma pesquisa quantitativa junto a três diferentes organizações. Os testes estatísticos revelaram que a utilização do MASP contribui para todos os níveis da aprendizagem organizacional. Contudo tal aprendizagem tende a se restringir freqüentemente às correções em rotinas, o que significa que a utilização do método em si não é capaz de gerar aprendizados mais profundos. A profundidade do aprendizado parece correlacionar-se mais fortemente com os fatores contextuais das organizações.  Editora Mackenzie2013-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesEstudo de caso comparativo de natureza quantitativaapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2013)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2013)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 14 n. 4 (2013)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEporhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200/4437https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200/8274Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVersiani, Angela FrançaOribe, Claudemir YoschihiroRrezende, Sergio Fernando Loureiro2013-09-04T17:50:18Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/3200Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:00:47.408637RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
La Aprendizaje de las Organizaciones Generada por las Prácticas Formales en el Lugar de Trabajo
A Aprendizagem das Organizações Gerada pelas Práticas Formais no Ambiente de Trabalho
title Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
spellingShingle Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
Versiani, Angela França
aprendizagem organizacional
práticas formais de aprendizagem
MASP
método de solução sistemática de problemas
aprendizagem no ambiente de trabalho.
title_short Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
title_full Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
title_fullStr Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
title_full_unstemmed Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
title_sort Learning in Organizations Triggered by Formal Practices in Work Environment
author Versiani, Angela França
author_facet Versiani, Angela França
Oribe, Claudemir Yoschihiro
Rrezende, Sergio Fernando Loureiro
author_role author
author2 Oribe, Claudemir Yoschihiro
Rrezende, Sergio Fernando Loureiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Versiani, Angela França
Oribe, Claudemir Yoschihiro
Rrezende, Sergio Fernando Loureiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aprendizagem organizacional
práticas formais de aprendizagem
MASP
método de solução sistemática de problemas
aprendizagem no ambiente de trabalho.
topic aprendizagem organizacional
práticas formais de aprendizagem
MASP
método de solução sistemática de problemas
aprendizagem no ambiente de trabalho.
description This article aims to assess the degree to which formal practices introduced in work environment contribute to organizational learning. The theoretical background recognizes that companies adapt to the environmental by individual knowledge absorption in collective properties. This knowledge is incorporated in organizational practices. At the moment companies deal to changing environmental they need to exploit current resources, explore new ones and turn into their practices. Such flow is called by organizational learning.The systematic problem-solving method is considered as one of most recommended formal practices to promote organizational learning. However if the one side there is the valuation of such method on the other hand the literature needs its critical evaluation. In other words, there are a few empirical evidences that assess the real contribution of this method to promote organizational learning. Thus there is a gap between recommendation for its use and theoretical underpinning of such suggestion. This article asks in what measure the systematic problem-solving method contribute to organizational learning. This question is important to highlight its effects over the organizations that employ it.Thus the research focus on MASP, one of the systematic problem-solving method more release in Brazil. To do so, it was considered that organizational learning is composed by four dimensions: knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. It was conducted a survey with three different organization. The analyses have been focused on how MASP is related to the four dimension of organizational learning. More specifically, it was identified what dimension and the type of organizational learning that are supported by MASP.The statistical tests pointed out that the using of MASP contributed to learning at all organizational dimension, such as knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation, and organizational memory. However, this learning was restricted to corrections in routines, which means that the method itself was not able to trigger learning at deeper levels. In reality, the depth of learning seemed to be correlated to the contextual factors in organizations.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Estudo de caso comparativo de natureza quantitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200/4437
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/3200/8274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2013)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2013)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 14 n. 4 (2013)
1678-6971
1518-6776
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1796794717973774336