Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha-Melo,Jose Renan
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Costa,Guilherme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292014000600307
Resumo: Despite early disappointments, the three main types of visceral transplantation (isolated intestine, liver intestine, and multivisceral) have evolved into the standard of care for patients with nutritional failure and complex abdominal pathology. Visceral allografts have been assessed in clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histopathologic studies. Absorptive functions of engrafted intestine have been assessed by body weight, body mass index, and z scores, serum levels of albumin, vitamins, and trace elements, as well as measurements of bone mineral density. Allograft rejection, infection, and renal failure, are the leading causes of death. Additionally, nonfunctional social support and progression of primary disease contribute to mortality rates beyond the fiveand ten-year follow-up landmarks. Remote events, including acute rejection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and graft-versus-host-disease were significantly higher in pediatric recipients. Adult recipients experience higher incidences of de novo malignancy, primary disease recurrence, and impaired skeletal health. The leading causes of death are graft failure, complications of therapy, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, progression of primary disease, and others, such as substance abuse, suicide and lack of support. Health status was sustained with successful interventions to treat hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, and renal failure. In spite of disease recurrence and long-term immunosuppression-related morbidities, the health status of most survivors has been sustained with successful interventions to treat occurring co-morbidities. With continual improvement in early survival and long-term rehabilitative efficacy, visceral transplantation should be considered a better therapeutic option for patients with severe intestinal failure.
id METC-1_ba25c01200785b06ade5f56b6eedc121
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2358-04292014000600307
network_acronym_str METC-1
network_name_str MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current statusIntestinal transplantationGastrointestinal rehabilitationMultivisceral transplantationDespite early disappointments, the three main types of visceral transplantation (isolated intestine, liver intestine, and multivisceral) have evolved into the standard of care for patients with nutritional failure and complex abdominal pathology. Visceral allografts have been assessed in clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histopathologic studies. Absorptive functions of engrafted intestine have been assessed by body weight, body mass index, and z scores, serum levels of albumin, vitamins, and trace elements, as well as measurements of bone mineral density. Allograft rejection, infection, and renal failure, are the leading causes of death. Additionally, nonfunctional social support and progression of primary disease contribute to mortality rates beyond the fiveand ten-year follow-up landmarks. Remote events, including acute rejection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and graft-versus-host-disease were significantly higher in pediatric recipients. Adult recipients experience higher incidences of de novo malignancy, primary disease recurrence, and impaired skeletal health. The leading causes of death are graft failure, complications of therapy, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, progression of primary disease, and others, such as substance abuse, suicide and lack of support. Health status was sustained with successful interventions to treat hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, and renal failure. In spite of disease recurrence and long-term immunosuppression-related morbidities, the health status of most survivors has been sustained with successful interventions to treat occurring co-morbidities. With continual improvement in early survival and long-term rehabilitative efficacy, visceral transplantation should be considered a better therapeutic option for patients with severe intestinal failure.Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292014000600307MedicalExpress v.1 n.6 2014reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEinstacron:METC10.5935/MedicalExpress.2014.06.05info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha-Melo,Jose RenanCosta,Guilhermeeng2016-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-04292014000600307Revistahttp://www.medicalexpress.net.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||medicalexpress@me.net.br2358-04292318-8111opendoar:2016-03-24T00:00MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
title Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
spellingShingle Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
Cunha-Melo,Jose Renan
Intestinal transplantation
Gastrointestinal rehabilitation
Multivisceral transplantation
title_short Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
title_full Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
title_fullStr Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
title_full_unstemmed Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
title_sort Intestinal transplantation: evolution and current status
author Cunha-Melo,Jose Renan
author_facet Cunha-Melo,Jose Renan
Costa,Guilherme
author_role author
author2 Costa,Guilherme
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha-Melo,Jose Renan
Costa,Guilherme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intestinal transplantation
Gastrointestinal rehabilitation
Multivisceral transplantation
topic Intestinal transplantation
Gastrointestinal rehabilitation
Multivisceral transplantation
description Despite early disappointments, the three main types of visceral transplantation (isolated intestine, liver intestine, and multivisceral) have evolved into the standard of care for patients with nutritional failure and complex abdominal pathology. Visceral allografts have been assessed in clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histopathologic studies. Absorptive functions of engrafted intestine have been assessed by body weight, body mass index, and z scores, serum levels of albumin, vitamins, and trace elements, as well as measurements of bone mineral density. Allograft rejection, infection, and renal failure, are the leading causes of death. Additionally, nonfunctional social support and progression of primary disease contribute to mortality rates beyond the fiveand ten-year follow-up landmarks. Remote events, including acute rejection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and graft-versus-host-disease were significantly higher in pediatric recipients. Adult recipients experience higher incidences of de novo malignancy, primary disease recurrence, and impaired skeletal health. The leading causes of death are graft failure, complications of therapy, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, progression of primary disease, and others, such as substance abuse, suicide and lack of support. Health status was sustained with successful interventions to treat hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, and renal failure. In spite of disease recurrence and long-term immunosuppression-related morbidities, the health status of most survivors has been sustained with successful interventions to treat occurring co-morbidities. With continual improvement in early survival and long-term rehabilitative efficacy, visceral transplantation should be considered a better therapeutic option for patients with severe intestinal failure.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292014000600307
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292014000600307
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/MedicalExpress.2014.06.05
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedicalExpress v.1 n.6 2014
reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
instacron:METC
instname_str Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
instacron_str METC
institution METC
reponame_str MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
collection MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||medicalexpress@me.net.br
_version_ 1754734596618977280