A PESQUISA ACADÊMICA SOBRE COMUNICAÇÃO POPULAR, ALTERNATIVA E COMUNITÁRIA NO BRASIL: análise de dissertações e teses produzidas em Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação entre 1972 - 2012

• Autor(a) principal: OTRE, MARIA ALICE CAMPAGNOLI
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da METODISTA
• Texto Completo: http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/1496
• topic: Comunicação Popular; Comunicação alternativa; Comunicação Comunitária; Pós-graduação; Brasil. 1972 a 2012; Popular Communication; Alternative Communication; Community Communication; Post-Graduation; Brazil;1972 to 2012.; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO

Mapping of the dissertations and theses regarding the subarea of popular, alternative and community communication (PACC) developed in the Post Graduate Programs in sticto sensu Communication in Brazil, from 1972 to 2012. Within the main objectives, we intended to track the researches; the authors; their distribution within time and space; identify the institutions and advisors which promote the subarea; define the theoretical methodological approaches; and point referential authors/concepts. By means of exploratory research and the application of four filters, we got to a final sample of 102 researches, 87 dissertations and 15 theses, subjected to quantitative analysis, by means of Content Analysis towards the pre-established parts (Abstract, Key Words, Introduction, Summary, Closing Remarks and Methodological Chapter, when existing), and a qualitative analysis of the full content of the 15 theses. The method guiding this research is the historical dialectic with a view to finding an analysis of a context and attentive to the contradictions and changes that the object is involved; and the bibliographic research which supports it is anchored in authors, such as, Jorge González, Cicilia Peruzzo, Regina Festa, Pedro Gilberto Gomes, Gilberto Giménez and Augusto Triviños. The research was held with software NVivo support. Quantitative results indicated: a) predominance of community communication research (68%); b) prevalence of empiric studies (79%); c) the variety of denominations attributed to the experiences by the researchers; d) the constant struggle of the popular classes to democratize communication and to achieve social rights; e) the relevance and influence of the organic intellectuals on the studied experiences; f) methodological problems; g) UMESP, USP and UFRJ as the lead producers on this sub-area, and; h) Cicilia Peruzzo and Raquel Paiva as the supervisors who mostly advise theses on the theme. As for the qualitative analysis, there were some criteria that permeate the PACC: 1) the definition of subaltern classes; 2) the importance of the communities’ active participation in the communication processes and; 3) forms, contents and objectives that complement each other and give identity to the experiences