BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, Henrique Savonitti
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Lucas Vieira da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/235
Resumo: The STF compositional model is analyzed compared to the Italian Constitutional Court, in order to verify the following matter: what is the level of democratic motivation in the minister's designation? The hypothesis was considered: The democratic efficiency in STF's compositional process is debated. Tracing a parallel between Brazilian and Italian Courts is the general purpose. The specific objectives are: to outline the constitutional Courts in broad angle; to detail STF's internal structure, and to differ it from the Italian Court. This paper is relevant to the law agent, due to possibility of have an effect in the law institutions' efficiency; for legal sciences it is relevant due to STF's decisiveness nature; it is also relevant to the society given that the popular participation in these matters legitimizes the Federal Supreme Court. This paper is a theoretical qualitative research.
id PROCESSUS1_a66a952a403e1e81e348c172079df098
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/235
network_acronym_str PROCESSUS1
network_name_str Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social
repository_id_str
spelling BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSBRASIL E ITÁLIA: UM COMPARATIVO ENTRE OS MODELOS DE COMPOSIÇÃO DAS CORTES CONSTITUCIONAISFederal Supreme Court. Italian Constitutional Court. Comparative Constitutional Law. Fundamental Rights. Democracy.Supremo Tribunal Federal. Corte Constitucional Italiana. Direito Constitucional Comparado. Direitos Fundamentais. Democracia.The STF compositional model is analyzed compared to the Italian Constitutional Court, in order to verify the following matter: what is the level of democratic motivation in the minister's designation? The hypothesis was considered: The democratic efficiency in STF's compositional process is debated. Tracing a parallel between Brazilian and Italian Courts is the general purpose. The specific objectives are: to outline the constitutional Courts in broad angle; to detail STF's internal structure, and to differ it from the Italian Court. This paper is relevant to the law agent, due to possibility of have an effect in the law institutions' efficiency; for legal sciences it is relevant due to STF's decisiveness nature; it is also relevant to the society given that the popular participation in these matters legitimizes the Federal Supreme Court. This paper is a theoretical qualitative research.Analisa-se o modelo compositivo do STF contraposto à Corte Constitucional Italiana para examinar o seguinte problema: qual o grau de estí­mulo democrático na indicação dos ministros? Cogitou-se a hipótese: discute-se a eficácia democrática do processo compositivo do STF. O objetivo geral é analisar a estrutura do STF, paralelamente à Corte Italiana. Os objetivos especí­ficos são: delinear os Tribunais Constitucionais em sentido amplo; minuciar o STF; diferir este da Corte Italiana. Este trabalho é importante para o operador do Direito devido à possibilidade de sopesar a eficiência das instituições jurí­dicas; para a ciência jurí­dica, é relevante pela natureza finalí­stica do STF; agrega à sociedade pelo fato da participação popular em tais assuntos reforçar a legitimidade do STF. Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa teórica.Centro Universitário Processus (UniProcessus)2020-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/23510.5281/zenodo.4021677Processus Journal of Public Policy and Social Development; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-56Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas y Desarrollo Social; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-56Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social; v. 2 n. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-562675-0236reponame:Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Socialinstname:Faculdade Processus (DF)instacron:PROCESSUS1porhttp://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/235/331Miranda, Henrique SavonittiSilva, Lucas Vieira dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-04T14:33:10Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/235Revistahttp://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/indexPRIhttp://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/oaidanilocosta@institutoprocessus.com.br||jonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br||2675-02362675-0236opendoar:2022-08-04T14:33:10Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social - Faculdade Processus (DF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
BRASIL E ITÁLIA: UM COMPARATIVO ENTRE OS MODELOS DE COMPOSIÇÃO DAS CORTES CONSTITUCIONAIS
title BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
spellingShingle BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
Miranda, Henrique Savonitti
Federal Supreme Court. Italian Constitutional Court. Comparative Constitutional Law. Fundamental Rights. Democracy.
Supremo Tribunal Federal. Corte Constitucional Italiana. Direito Constitucional Comparado. Direitos Fundamentais. Democracia.
title_short BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
title_full BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
title_fullStr BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
title_full_unstemmed BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
title_sort BRAZIL AND ITALY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPOSITIONAL MODELS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS
author Miranda, Henrique Savonitti
author_facet Miranda, Henrique Savonitti
Silva, Lucas Vieira da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Lucas Vieira da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, Henrique Savonitti
Silva, Lucas Vieira da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Federal Supreme Court. Italian Constitutional Court. Comparative Constitutional Law. Fundamental Rights. Democracy.
Supremo Tribunal Federal. Corte Constitucional Italiana. Direito Constitucional Comparado. Direitos Fundamentais. Democracia.
topic Federal Supreme Court. Italian Constitutional Court. Comparative Constitutional Law. Fundamental Rights. Democracy.
Supremo Tribunal Federal. Corte Constitucional Italiana. Direito Constitucional Comparado. Direitos Fundamentais. Democracia.
description The STF compositional model is analyzed compared to the Italian Constitutional Court, in order to verify the following matter: what is the level of democratic motivation in the minister's designation? The hypothesis was considered: The democratic efficiency in STF's compositional process is debated. Tracing a parallel between Brazilian and Italian Courts is the general purpose. The specific objectives are: to outline the constitutional Courts in broad angle; to detail STF's internal structure, and to differ it from the Italian Court. This paper is relevant to the law agent, due to possibility of have an effect in the law institutions' efficiency; for legal sciences it is relevant due to STF's decisiveness nature; it is also relevant to the society given that the popular participation in these matters legitimizes the Federal Supreme Court. This paper is a theoretical qualitative research.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/235
10.5281/zenodo.4021677
url http://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/235
identifier_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.4021677
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/ppds/article/view/235/331
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Processus (UniProcessus)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Processus (UniProcessus)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Processus Journal of Public Policy and Social Development; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-56
Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas y Desarrollo Social; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-56
Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social; v. 2 n. 4 (2020): Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social (jun./dez.); 40-56
2675-0236
reponame:Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social
instname:Faculdade Processus (DF)
instacron:PROCESSUS1
instname_str Faculdade Processus (DF)
instacron_str PROCESSUS1
institution PROCESSUS1
reponame_str Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social
collection Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Processus de políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social - Faculdade Processus (DF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv danilocosta@institutoprocessus.com.br||jonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br||
_version_ 1797068740372725760

Registros relacionados