Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Judice-Daher,Danielle Marcilio
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Bueno,José Lino Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882013000300017
Resumo: The reinforcement omission effect (ROE), reflected by response rates that are higher after reinforcement omission than after reinforcement delivery, has been attributed to both motivational and attentional consequences of the surprising reinforcement omission. These processes depend on the operation of separate amygdala areas and their connections with other brain systems. The interaction between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex has been suggested to be important in the modulation of motivational processes. The present study sought to verify whether the mechanisms involved in the ROE depend on the integrity of the orbitofrontal cortex. Prior to acquisition training, rats received bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex or sham lesions. Following postoperative recovery, the rats were trained on a fixed-interval 12 s limited-hold 6 s signaled schedule of reinforcement. After the acquisition of stable performance, the training was changed from a 100% to 50% schedule of reinforcement. The results showed that rats in both groups exhibited the ROE, with no differences in performance between groups following nonreinforcement. These data do not support the hypothesis that the orbitofrontal cortex is included in the neural substrates related to ROE modulation. The results also showed no difference in response rates between groups in the periods that preceded and followed nonreinforcement. These findings confirm previous studies that showed that the ROE is not related to the facilitation of behavior induced by nonreinforcement.
id PUCRJ-1_2625a0ed5b230f80b0158098c9676185
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-32882013000300017
network_acronym_str PUCRJ-1
network_name_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in ratsreinforcement omission effectorbitofrontal cortexoperant behaviorratsThe reinforcement omission effect (ROE), reflected by response rates that are higher after reinforcement omission than after reinforcement delivery, has been attributed to both motivational and attentional consequences of the surprising reinforcement omission. These processes depend on the operation of separate amygdala areas and their connections with other brain systems. The interaction between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex has been suggested to be important in the modulation of motivational processes. The present study sought to verify whether the mechanisms involved in the ROE depend on the integrity of the orbitofrontal cortex. Prior to acquisition training, rats received bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex or sham lesions. Following postoperative recovery, the rats were trained on a fixed-interval 12 s limited-hold 6 s signaled schedule of reinforcement. After the acquisition of stable performance, the training was changed from a 100% to 50% schedule of reinforcement. The results showed that rats in both groups exhibited the ROE, with no differences in performance between groups following nonreinforcement. These data do not support the hypothesis that the orbitofrontal cortex is included in the neural substrates related to ROE modulation. The results also showed no difference in response rates between groups in the periods that preceded and followed nonreinforcement. These findings confirm previous studies that showed that the ROE is not related to the facilitation of behavior induced by nonreinforcement.Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de São Paulo2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882013000300017Psychology & Neuroscience v.6 n.3 2013reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)instacron:PUCRJ10.3922/j.psns.2013.3.17info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJudice-Daher,Danielle MarcilioBueno,José Lino Oliveiraeng2014-02-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-32882013000300017Revistahttps://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pnePRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppsycneuro@psycneuro.org1983-32881984-3054opendoar:2014-02-28T00:00Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
title Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
spellingShingle Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
Judice-Daher,Danielle Marcilio
reinforcement omission effect
orbitofrontal cortex
operant behavior
rats
title_short Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
title_full Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
title_fullStr Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
title_full_unstemmed Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
title_sort Lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex do not affect the reinforcement omission effect in rats
author Judice-Daher,Danielle Marcilio
author_facet Judice-Daher,Danielle Marcilio
Bueno,José Lino Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Bueno,José Lino Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Judice-Daher,Danielle Marcilio
Bueno,José Lino Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv reinforcement omission effect
orbitofrontal cortex
operant behavior
rats
topic reinforcement omission effect
orbitofrontal cortex
operant behavior
rats
description The reinforcement omission effect (ROE), reflected by response rates that are higher after reinforcement omission than after reinforcement delivery, has been attributed to both motivational and attentional consequences of the surprising reinforcement omission. These processes depend on the operation of separate amygdala areas and their connections with other brain systems. The interaction between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex has been suggested to be important in the modulation of motivational processes. The present study sought to verify whether the mechanisms involved in the ROE depend on the integrity of the orbitofrontal cortex. Prior to acquisition training, rats received bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex or sham lesions. Following postoperative recovery, the rats were trained on a fixed-interval 12 s limited-hold 6 s signaled schedule of reinforcement. After the acquisition of stable performance, the training was changed from a 100% to 50% schedule of reinforcement. The results showed that rats in both groups exhibited the ROE, with no differences in performance between groups following nonreinforcement. These data do not support the hypothesis that the orbitofrontal cortex is included in the neural substrates related to ROE modulation. The results also showed no difference in response rates between groups in the periods that preceded and followed nonreinforcement. These findings confirm previous studies that showed that the ROE is not related to the facilitation of behavior induced by nonreinforcement.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882013000300017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882013000300017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.3922/j.psns.2013.3.17
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience v.6 n.3 2013
reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron:PUCRJ
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron_str PUCRJ
institution PUCRJ
reponame_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
collection Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv psycneuro@psycneuro.org
_version_ 1754821073116856320