Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McNaughton,Neil
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882011000200002
Resumo: This paper reviews the historical development of a two-dimensional (direction x distance (?)) neural model of defense. It begins with Miller's (1944) analysis, and model, of approach, avoidance and conflict; adds Hinde's (1966) ethological perspective and Flynn's (1967) neural model of fear; and then considers Gray's (1967, 1970) work linking barbiturate action to the hippocampus, McNaughton's (1977) extension of this to other classes of anxiolytics, and Gray & McNaughton's (1983) detailed behavioral comparison of anxiolytics and hippocampal lesions. This work led to Gray's (1982) detailed model of the neuropsychology of anxiety. Rapoport's (1989) model of the control of obsession by the cingulate cortex, and Ledoux's (1994) model of the control of both fear and anxiety to the amygdala, suggested a more complex organisation of defense systems. McNaughton (1989) argued that evolutionary function defines an emotion, and Blanchard and Blanchard (1990) argued for its assessment via ethoexperimental analysis. Graeff (1994) then produced a neural model that mapped defensive distance to neural level, treating all anxiety as being at a greater defensive distance than fear. Seeing this, and the treatment of anxiety as due to uncertainty (which is inconsistent with Miller's data), as being unsatisfactory, Gray and McNaughton (2000) and then McNaughton and Corr (2004) developed the two-dimensional model of defensive systems. This model is clearly incomplete at the present time and its links with neuroeconomics, personality, and stress and greater specification of frontal cortical contributions are suggested as directions for future development.
id PUCRJ-1_c5ccad312f7a0db114b8d37c74d25b42
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-32882011000200002
network_acronym_str PUCRJ-1
network_name_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theoriesfearanxietyperiaqueductal grayhypothalamushippocampusamygdalacingulate cortexfrontal córtexThis paper reviews the historical development of a two-dimensional (direction x distance (?)) neural model of defense. It begins with Miller's (1944) analysis, and model, of approach, avoidance and conflict; adds Hinde's (1966) ethological perspective and Flynn's (1967) neural model of fear; and then considers Gray's (1967, 1970) work linking barbiturate action to the hippocampus, McNaughton's (1977) extension of this to other classes of anxiolytics, and Gray & McNaughton's (1983) detailed behavioral comparison of anxiolytics and hippocampal lesions. This work led to Gray's (1982) detailed model of the neuropsychology of anxiety. Rapoport's (1989) model of the control of obsession by the cingulate cortex, and Ledoux's (1994) model of the control of both fear and anxiety to the amygdala, suggested a more complex organisation of defense systems. McNaughton (1989) argued that evolutionary function defines an emotion, and Blanchard and Blanchard (1990) argued for its assessment via ethoexperimental analysis. Graeff (1994) then produced a neural model that mapped defensive distance to neural level, treating all anxiety as being at a greater defensive distance than fear. Seeing this, and the treatment of anxiety as due to uncertainty (which is inconsistent with Miller's data), as being unsatisfactory, Gray and McNaughton (2000) and then McNaughton and Corr (2004) developed the two-dimensional model of defensive systems. This model is clearly incomplete at the present time and its links with neuroeconomics, personality, and stress and greater specification of frontal cortical contributions are suggested as directions for future development.Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882011000200002Psychology & Neuroscience v.4 n.2 2011reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)instacron:PUCRJ10.3922/j.psns.2011.2.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcNaughton,Neileng2012-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-32882011000200002Revistahttps://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pnePRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppsycneuro@psycneuro.org1983-32881984-3054opendoar:2012-02-02T00:00Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
title Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
spellingShingle Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
McNaughton,Neil
fear
anxiety
periaqueductal gray
hypothalamus
hippocampus
amygdala
cingulate cortex
frontal córtex
title_short Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
title_full Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
title_fullStr Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
title_full_unstemmed Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
title_sort Fear, anxiety and their disorders: past, present and future neural theories
author McNaughton,Neil
author_facet McNaughton,Neil
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McNaughton,Neil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fear
anxiety
periaqueductal gray
hypothalamus
hippocampus
amygdala
cingulate cortex
frontal córtex
topic fear
anxiety
periaqueductal gray
hypothalamus
hippocampus
amygdala
cingulate cortex
frontal córtex
description This paper reviews the historical development of a two-dimensional (direction x distance (?)) neural model of defense. It begins with Miller's (1944) analysis, and model, of approach, avoidance and conflict; adds Hinde's (1966) ethological perspective and Flynn's (1967) neural model of fear; and then considers Gray's (1967, 1970) work linking barbiturate action to the hippocampus, McNaughton's (1977) extension of this to other classes of anxiolytics, and Gray & McNaughton's (1983) detailed behavioral comparison of anxiolytics and hippocampal lesions. This work led to Gray's (1982) detailed model of the neuropsychology of anxiety. Rapoport's (1989) model of the control of obsession by the cingulate cortex, and Ledoux's (1994) model of the control of both fear and anxiety to the amygdala, suggested a more complex organisation of defense systems. McNaughton (1989) argued that evolutionary function defines an emotion, and Blanchard and Blanchard (1990) argued for its assessment via ethoexperimental analysis. Graeff (1994) then produced a neural model that mapped defensive distance to neural level, treating all anxiety as being at a greater defensive distance than fear. Seeing this, and the treatment of anxiety as due to uncertainty (which is inconsistent with Miller's data), as being unsatisfactory, Gray and McNaughton (2000) and then McNaughton and Corr (2004) developed the two-dimensional model of defensive systems. This model is clearly incomplete at the present time and its links with neuroeconomics, personality, and stress and greater specification of frontal cortical contributions are suggested as directions for future development.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882011000200002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882011000200002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.3922/j.psns.2011.2.002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience v.4 n.2 2011
reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron:PUCRJ
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron_str PUCRJ
institution PUCRJ
reponame_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
collection Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv psycneuro@psycneuro.org
_version_ 1754821072419553280