Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional PUCRS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/381
Resumo: This in vitro study evaluated the distribution of bending moments, compressive and tensile forces in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses, as a function of the inclination of the distal implants (straight or tilted) and the number of abutments (three, four, or five). Specimens were ten metallic bar structures cast in Pd-Ag alloy, simulating Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by five implants. These structures were made over two master models: one model with parallel and straight implants (n = 5) and one model with the distal implants tilted (n = 5). Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm) of each specimen. The deformation values were measured when the metallic bars were tested over three, four, or five abutments in the two master models. The deformation values were transformed into force and bending moment values and analyzed by ANOVA for randomized blocks design, followed by Tukey's test multiple comparisons, at the 5% level of significance. Abutment #1 (adjacent to cantilever under load) had the highest values of force and saggital bending moment for all tests with three, four, or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, the force in abutment #1 was higher in the straight model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than with three abutments. The results suggest that the inclination of posterior implants allow better distribution of axial forces and bending moments in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by four or five abutments in comparison with the use of only three abutments.
id PUCR_9cf51361b3e4c623768d1693fb58dc9a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucrs.br:10923/381
network_acronym_str PUCR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
repository_id_str
spelling Naconecy, Marcos MichelonShinkai, Rosemary S. A.2011-12-27T14:14:06Z2011-12-27T14:14:06Z2006http://hdl.handle.net/10923/381This in vitro study evaluated the distribution of bending moments, compressive and tensile forces in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses, as a function of the inclination of the distal implants (straight or tilted) and the number of abutments (three, four, or five). Specimens were ten metallic bar structures cast in Pd-Ag alloy, simulating Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by five implants. These structures were made over two master models: one model with parallel and straight implants (n = 5) and one model with the distal implants tilted (n = 5). Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm) of each specimen. The deformation values were measured when the metallic bars were tested over three, four, or five abutments in the two master models. The deformation values were transformed into force and bending moment values and analyzed by ANOVA for randomized blocks design, followed by Tukey's test multiple comparisons, at the 5% level of significance. Abutment #1 (adjacent to cantilever under load) had the highest values of force and saggital bending moment for all tests with three, four, or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, the force in abutment #1 was higher in the straight model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than with three abutments. The results suggest that the inclination of posterior implants allow better distribution of axial forces and bending moments in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by four or five abutments in comparison with the use of only three abutments.Este estudo in vitro teve por objetivo analisar as forças de tração, compressão e momentos fletores exercidos nos pilares de sustentação de próteses tipo protocolo Brånemark em função da variação do número de pilares (três, quatro ou cinco) e da inclinação dos implantes distais (retos ou inclinados). Foram fabricadas dez barras metálicas em liga de Prata-Paládio, as quais simularam uma prótese fixa tipo Protocolo Brånemark sobre dois modelos-mestre: um modelo com todos os implantes retos e paralelos entre si (n=5 barras) e outro com os dois implantes distais inclinados (n=5 barras). Extensômetros foram colados nos pilares protéticos de cada modelo-mestre para medir a deformação quando da aplicação de uma carga estática de 50 N no extremo livre (15 mm) de cada barra metálica. Os valores de deformação foram medidos quando as barras foram testadas sobre três, quatro e cinco pilares dos modelos reto e inclinado. Os valores de deformação dos pilares foram convertidos em força e momento fletor através de cálculos matemáticos e analisados por ANOVA para delineamento em blocos casualizados, complementada pelo Teste de Comparações Múltiplas de Tukey, ao nível de significância de 5%. O pilar 1 (adjacente ao cantilever sob carga) apresentou força e momento ântero-posterior significativamente maiores do que os demais pilares em todas as configurações. Para força no pilar 1, independentemente do número de pilares, o modelo reto apresentou maior força do que no modelo inclinado. O momento geral foi maior com três pilares em relação às configurações com quatro ou cinco pilares. Nas configurações com quatro e cinco pilares, independente da inclinação dos implantes, a média de força foi menor do que na configuração de três pilares. Os resultados sugerem que a inclinação dos implantes posteriores permite uma melhor distribuição de forças e momentos fletores em pilares para próteses tipo Protocolo Brånemark nas configurações com quatro e cinco pilares em relação à configuração com três pilares.Made available in DSpace on 2011-12-27T14:14:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 000347078-0.pdf: 3100717 bytes, checksum: 8eb98e89cc77c38eba3eacc34452c1bb (MD5) license.txt: 581 bytes, checksum: 44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc (MD5)Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreODONTOLOGIAIMPLANTODONTIAPRÓTESE DENTÁRIAForça e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de OdontologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em OdontologiaDoutorado2006porreponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINAL000347078-0.pdfTexto Completoapplication/pdf3100717repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/1/000347078-0.pdf8eb98e89cc77c38eba3eacc34452c1bbMD51LICENSElicense.txttext/plain581repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/2/license.txt44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adcMD52TEXT000347078-0.pdf.txt000347078-0.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain147627repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/3/000347078-0.pdf.txt0bb7bf932dd93969519743826804c411MD5310923/3812017-09-28 11:05:35.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ório InstitucionalPRI
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
title Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
spellingShingle Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
ODONTOLOGIA
IMPLANTODONTIA
PRÓTESE DENTÁRIA
title_short Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
title_full Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
title_fullStr Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
title_full_unstemmed Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
title_sort Força e momento fletor em pilares de prótese tipo protocolo Branemark em função da inclinação dos implantes distais e do número de pilares
author Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
author_facet Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Naconecy, Marcos Michelon
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Shinkai, Rosemary S. A.
contributor_str_mv Shinkai, Rosemary S. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ODONTOLOGIA
IMPLANTODONTIA
PRÓTESE DENTÁRIA
topic ODONTOLOGIA
IMPLANTODONTIA
PRÓTESE DENTÁRIA
description This in vitro study evaluated the distribution of bending moments, compressive and tensile forces in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses, as a function of the inclination of the distal implants (straight or tilted) and the number of abutments (three, four, or five). Specimens were ten metallic bar structures cast in Pd-Ag alloy, simulating Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by five implants. These structures were made over two master models: one model with parallel and straight implants (n = 5) and one model with the distal implants tilted (n = 5). Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm) of each specimen. The deformation values were measured when the metallic bars were tested over three, four, or five abutments in the two master models. The deformation values were transformed into force and bending moment values and analyzed by ANOVA for randomized blocks design, followed by Tukey's test multiple comparisons, at the 5% level of significance. Abutment #1 (adjacent to cantilever under load) had the highest values of force and saggital bending moment for all tests with three, four, or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, the force in abutment #1 was higher in the straight model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than with three abutments. The results suggest that the inclination of posterior implants allow better distribution of axial forces and bending moments in abutments of Brånemark protocol prostheses supported by four or five abutments in comparison with the use of only three abutments.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2011-12-27T14:14:06Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-12-27T14:14:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10923/381
url http://hdl.handle.net/10923/381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
collection Repositório Institucional PUCRS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/1/000347078-0.pdf
repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/2/license.txt
repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/381/3/000347078-0.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8eb98e89cc77c38eba3eacc34452c1bb
44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc
0bb7bf932dd93969519743826804c411
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1731736511547703296