Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_3cc36ac172d3c476b4d8a5b275e9718f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6215 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off pointsAdipose tissueMuscle weaknessPostmenopauseSkeletal musclesObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2022-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-101678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215/3918Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas dos SANTOS, Camille Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Tasso Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Thais Alves BRITO, Marcos Henrique FERNANDES, José Ailton Oliveira CARNEIROhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdos SANTOS, Lucas Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso Alves BRITO, Thais FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton 2023-03-01T12:29:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6215Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-03-01T12:29Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
title |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
spellingShingle |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points dos SANTOS, Lucas Adipose tissue Muscle weakness Postmenopause Skeletal muscles |
title_short |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
title_full |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
title_fullStr |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
title_full_unstemmed |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
title_sort |
Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points |
author |
dos SANTOS, Lucas |
author_facet |
dos SANTOS, Lucas Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso Alves BRITO, Thais FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso Alves BRITO, Thais FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
dos SANTOS, Lucas Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso Alves BRITO, Thais FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adipose tissue Muscle weakness Postmenopause Skeletal muscles |
topic |
Adipose tissue Muscle weakness Postmenopause Skeletal muscles |
description |
ObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215/3918 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126067201441792 |