Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: dos SANTOS, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille, Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso, Alves BRITO, Thais, FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique, Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Nutrição
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215
Resumo: ObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity.
id PUC_CAMP-2_3cc36ac172d3c476b4d8a5b275e9718f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6215
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-2
network_name_str Revista de Nutrição
repository_id_str
spelling Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off pointsAdipose tissueMuscle weaknessPostmenopauseSkeletal musclesObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2022-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-101678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215/3918Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas dos SANTOS, Camille Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Tasso Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Thais Alves BRITO, Marcos Henrique FERNANDES, José Ailton Oliveira CARNEIROhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdos SANTOS, Lucas Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso Alves BRITO, Thais FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton 2023-03-01T12:29:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6215Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-03-01T12:29Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
title Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
spellingShingle Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
dos SANTOS, Lucas
Adipose tissue
Muscle weakness
Postmenopause
Skeletal muscles
title_short Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
title_full Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
title_fullStr Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
title_full_unstemmed Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
title_sort Body composition of women with and without dynapenia defined by different cut-off points
author dos SANTOS, Lucas
author_facet dos SANTOS, Lucas
Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille
Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso
Alves BRITO, Thais
FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique
Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton
author_role author
author2 Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille
Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso
Alves BRITO, Thais
FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique
Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos SANTOS, Lucas
Giehl Martins MIRANDA, Camille
Carvalho Barberino de SOUZA, Tasso
Alves BRITO, Thais
FERNANDES, Marcos Henrique
Oliveira CARNEIRO, José Ailton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adipose tissue
Muscle weakness
Postmenopause
Skeletal muscles
topic Adipose tissue
Muscle weakness
Postmenopause
Skeletal muscles
description ObjectiveTo compare body composition of postmenopausal women with and without dynapenia, defined by different cut-off points.MethodsBody composition was assessed by electrical bioimpedance and the nutritional status by the body mass index. Dynapenia was diagnosed according to handgrip strength, using the following cut-off points: handgrip strength <16kgf and <20 kgf. ResultsA total of 171 women (50 to 92 years of age) participated in the investigation. The mean age of non-dynapenic and dynapenic women (handgrip strength <20kgf) was 69.4±8.2 and 74.5±8.2 years, respectively. The mean age of women with dynapenia (handgrip strength <16kgf) was 75.0±10.1 years and non-dynapenic women, 71.1±8.2 years. It was found that dynapenic women, with handgrip strength <20 and <16kgf, had an average of 2.38 and 2.47kg less muscle mass respectively, when compared to non-dynapenic women (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in muscle mass between the different dynapenic groups. Non-dynapenic women (handgrip strength ≥20kgf) had more total (3.55kg) and central fat (1.47kg) (p<0.05).ConclusionDynapenic women, diagnosed considering both cutoff points, had less total and segmental muscle mass compared to non-dynapenic women. In addition, dynapenic women with handgrip strength <20kgf had lower total and trunk adiposity.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6215/3918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10
Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10
Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10
1678-9865
reponame:Revista de Nutrição
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Revista de Nutrição
collection Revista de Nutrição
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126067201441792