Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating the body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes. MethodsThe body composition of 51 volunteers aged 60 to 70 years, with body mass indices ranging from 19 and 43kg/m2, was determined by anthropometry (triceps, suprailiac and thigh skinfold thicknesses) and dual-energy X-ray, which is considered the gold standard. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement were the standard deviations of the dual-energy X-ray coefficient of variation and the anthropometric values should be in this range. The means were compared by the Student’s t-test followed by the Pearson’s correlation. ResultsLimits of agreement: weight (W, kg) M=0.3, SD=0.1, lean body mass (lear body mass, kg) M=3.0, SD=1.9; fat body mass (fat body mass, kg) M=5.0, SD=3.1, percentage of body fat (% body fat) M=5.0, SD=3.1. The means of the two methods were the same and within the limits of agreement. Anthropometry tended to overestimate lear body mass by 2.31 kg and underestimate fat body mass and % BF by -0.93 kg and -2.7%, respectively. The estimates correlated significantly (W, r=0.99; lear body mass, r=0.79; fat body mass, r=0.93; % body fat, r=0.72; p<0.0001). ConclusionThe anthropometric and dual-energy x-ray results were consistent. Although some lear body mass and % body fat results were beyond the limits of agreement, the others were within. Therefore, anthropometry can be used to assess the body composition of this population. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_ae3ff1556fe30a6ffd59b3101ff55f81 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9405 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryComposição corporal de idosas diabéticas tipo 2: antropometria vs absorcimetria de Raios-X de dupla energiaBody compositionDiabetes mellitus, type 2AgedComposição corporalDiabetes mellitus tipo-2IdosoObjectiveThis study aimed to compare anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating the body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes. MethodsThe body composition of 51 volunteers aged 60 to 70 years, with body mass indices ranging from 19 and 43kg/m2, was determined by anthropometry (triceps, suprailiac and thigh skinfold thicknesses) and dual-energy X-ray, which is considered the gold standard. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement were the standard deviations of the dual-energy X-ray coefficient of variation and the anthropometric values should be in this range. The means were compared by the Student’s t-test followed by the Pearson’s correlation. ResultsLimits of agreement: weight (W, kg) M=0.3, SD=0.1, lean body mass (lear body mass, kg) M=3.0, SD=1.9; fat body mass (fat body mass, kg) M=5.0, SD=3.1, percentage of body fat (% body fat) M=5.0, SD=3.1. The means of the two methods were the same and within the limits of agreement. Anthropometry tended to overestimate lear body mass by 2.31 kg and underestimate fat body mass and % BF by -0.93 kg and -2.7%, respectively. The estimates correlated significantly (W, r=0.99; lear body mass, r=0.79; fat body mass, r=0.93; % body fat, r=0.72; p<0.0001). ConclusionThe anthropometric and dual-energy x-ray results were consistent. Although some lear body mass and % body fat results were beyond the limits of agreement, the others were within. Therefore, anthropometry can be used to assess the body composition of this population. ObjetivoComparar a antropometria ao exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura para estimativa da composição corporal de idosas diabéticas tipo 2. MétodosA composição corporal de 51 voluntárias de 60 a 70 anos de idade e índice de massa corporal de 19 a 43kg/m2 foi avaliada pelas medidas antropométricas das dobras cutâneas do tríceps, suprailíaca e coxa e associadas ao exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura, considerado o padrão ouro. Os intervalos de concordância de Bland e Altman foram os valores do desvio-padrão do coeficiente de variação do exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura e os valores da antropometria deviam estar nessa faixa. Foram comparadas as médias (teste t de Student) e feita a correlação de Pearson. ResultadosOs intervalos de concordância foram os seguintes: peso (kg) Média (M)=0,3, Desvio-Padrão (DP)=0,1, massa corporal magra (kg) M=3,0, DP=1,9, massa corporal gorda (kg) M=5,0, DP=3,1, percentual de gordura corporal (%GC) M=5,0, DP=3,1. As médias entre os métodos eram iguais e estavam dentro do intervalo de concordância; em média, a antropometria superestimava a massa corporal magra em 2,31kg, e subestimava a massa corporal gorda e o percentual de gordura corporal em -0,93 kg e -2,7% respectivamente; a correlação entre as estimativas eram significativas (P, r=0,99; MCM, r=0,79; MCG, r=0,93; %GC, r=0,72; p<0,0001). ConclusãoOs resultados da antropometria e do exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura foram consistentes. Embora tivesse parte dos resultados da massa corporal gorda e do percentual de gordura corporal fora do intervalo de concordância, os outros resultados foram correspondentes, sugerindo o uso da antropometria para avaliação da composição corporal nessa população.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405/6775Copyright (c) 2023 Waléria Christiane Rezende FETT, Carlos Alexandre FETT, Júlio Sergio MARCHINI, Júlio Cesar MORIGUTI, Eduardo FERRIOLLIhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRezende FETT, Waléria Christiane FETT, Carlos Alexandre MARCHINI, Júlio Sergio MORIGUTI, Júlio CesarFERRIOLLI, Eduardo2023-08-29T14:38:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9405Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-08-29T14:38:49Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Composição corporal de idosas diabéticas tipo 2: antropometria vs absorcimetria de Raios-X de dupla energia |
title |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
spellingShingle |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Rezende FETT, Waléria Christiane Body composition Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Aged Composição corporal Diabetes mellitus tipo-2 Idoso |
title_short |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_full |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_fullStr |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_sort |
Body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes: anthropometry vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
author |
Rezende FETT, Waléria Christiane |
author_facet |
Rezende FETT, Waléria Christiane FETT, Carlos Alexandre MARCHINI, Júlio Sergio MORIGUTI, Júlio Cesar FERRIOLLI, Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
FETT, Carlos Alexandre MARCHINI, Júlio Sergio MORIGUTI, Júlio Cesar FERRIOLLI, Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rezende FETT, Waléria Christiane FETT, Carlos Alexandre MARCHINI, Júlio Sergio MORIGUTI, Júlio Cesar FERRIOLLI, Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Body composition Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Aged Composição corporal Diabetes mellitus tipo-2 Idoso |
topic |
Body composition Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Aged Composição corporal Diabetes mellitus tipo-2 Idoso |
description |
ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating the body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes. MethodsThe body composition of 51 volunteers aged 60 to 70 years, with body mass indices ranging from 19 and 43kg/m2, was determined by anthropometry (triceps, suprailiac and thigh skinfold thicknesses) and dual-energy X-ray, which is considered the gold standard. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement were the standard deviations of the dual-energy X-ray coefficient of variation and the anthropometric values should be in this range. The means were compared by the Student’s t-test followed by the Pearson’s correlation. ResultsLimits of agreement: weight (W, kg) M=0.3, SD=0.1, lean body mass (lear body mass, kg) M=3.0, SD=1.9; fat body mass (fat body mass, kg) M=5.0, SD=3.1, percentage of body fat (% body fat) M=5.0, SD=3.1. The means of the two methods were the same and within the limits of agreement. Anthropometry tended to overestimate lear body mass by 2.31 kg and underestimate fat body mass and % BF by -0.93 kg and -2.7%, respectively. The estimates correlated significantly (W, r=0.99; lear body mass, r=0.79; fat body mass, r=0.93; % body fat, r=0.72; p<0.0001). ConclusionThe anthropometric and dual-energy x-ray results were consistent. Although some lear body mass and % body fat results were beyond the limits of agreement, the others were within. Therefore, anthropometry can be used to assess the body composition of this population. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9405/6775 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126073120653312 |