Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_d42de5b1246b79d4484447e4016a18d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9418 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?Hortaliças in natura ou minimamente processadas em unidades de alimentação e nutrição: quais aspectos devem ser considerados na sua aquisição?Food supplyFood servicesQuality managementGreensAbastecimento de alimentosAlimentação coletivaGestão de qualidadeHortalObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. ObjetivoO objetivo do estudo foi avaliar as perdas ocorridas no processamento de hortaliças in natura, comparar o custo da aquisição de hortaliças in natura e das minimamente processadas e discutir as vantagens e desvantagens da utilização destas últimas. MétodosForam calculados fatores de correção de sete hortaliças por meio da determinação do peso bruto e do peso líquido em triplicata e o peso aferido por balança digital. Foram calculados média, desvio-padrão e coeficiente de variação. Os custos do peso bruto, considerando a correção pelo seu rendimento líquido, foram comparados aos custos das hortaliças minimamente processadas fornecidos pelo fabricante em dois períodos. ResultadosOs valores da abobrinha, cenoura, chuchu e mandioquinha minimamente processados foram, respectivamente, 8,6%, 14,1%, 4,6% e 13,5% menores em relação ao custo do alimento bruto no tempo 1, mas isso não se repetiu no tempo 2, quando os alimentos in natura apresentavam menor custo. ConclusãoConclui-se que inúmeros fatores inerentes ou externos aos alimentos influenciam diretamente na magnitude das perdas durante o processamento. Os métodos de trabalho e objetivos finais de cada unidade produtora é que devem definir qual produto é o mais vantajoso, considerando que os custos são variáveis, uma vez que a produção pode ser comprometida pela sazonalidade e pela oferta e procura dos alimentos, com repercussão na gestão de qualidade da unidade.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418/6790Copyright (c) 2023 Gabriel Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Camila Cremonezi JAPUR, Ana Paula Lara Michelin SANCHES, Cecília Helena Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Luzania dos Santos MARTINS, Cecília Vilela dos REIS, Marta Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania Vilela dos REIS, CecíliaNeves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta 2023-08-29T14:38:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9418Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-08-29T14:38:45Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? Hortaliças in natura ou minimamente processadas em unidades de alimentação e nutrição: quais aspectos devem ser considerados na sua aquisição? |
title |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
spellingShingle |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel Food supply Food services Quality management Greens Abastecimento de alimentos Alimentação coletiva Gestão de qualidade Hortal |
title_short |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
title_full |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
title_fullStr |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
title_sort |
Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them? |
author |
Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel |
author_facet |
Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania Vilela dos REIS, Cecília Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania Vilela dos REIS, Cecília Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania Vilela dos REIS, Cecília Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Food supply Food services Quality management Greens Abastecimento de alimentos Alimentação coletiva Gestão de qualidade Hortal |
topic |
Food supply Food services Quality management Greens Abastecimento de alimentos Alimentação coletiva Gestão de qualidade Hortal |
description |
ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418/6790 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126073153159168 |