Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila, Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara, Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena, dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania, Vilela dos REIS, Cecília, Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Nutrição
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418
Resumo: ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. 
id PUC_CAMP-2_d42de5b1246b79d4484447e4016a18d1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9418
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-2
network_name_str Revista de Nutrição
repository_id_str
spelling Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?Hortaliças in natura ou minimamente processadas em unidades de alimentação e nutrição: quais aspectos devem ser considerados na sua aquisição?Food supplyFood servicesQuality managementGreensAbastecimento de alimentosAlimentação coletivaGestão de qualidadeHortalObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. ObjetivoO objetivo do estudo foi avaliar as perdas ocorridas no processamento de hortaliças in natura, comparar o custo da aquisição de hortaliças in natura e das minimamente processadas e discutir as vantagens e desvantagens da utilização destas últimas. MétodosForam calculados fatores de correção de sete hortaliças por meio da determinação do peso bruto e do peso líquido em triplicata e o peso aferido por balança digital. Foram calculados média, desvio-padrão e coeficiente de variação. Os custos do peso bruto, considerando a correção pelo seu rendimento líquido, foram comparados aos custos das hortaliças minimamente processadas fornecidos pelo fabricante em dois períodos. ResultadosOs valores da abobrinha, cenoura, chuchu e mandioquinha minimamente processados foram, respectivamente, 8,6%, 14,1%, 4,6% e 13,5% menores em relação ao custo do alimento bruto no tempo 1, mas isso não se repetiu no tempo 2, quando os alimentos in natura apresentavam menor custo. ConclusãoConclui-se que inúmeros fatores inerentes ou externos aos alimentos influenciam diretamente na magnitude das perdas durante o processamento. Os métodos de trabalho e objetivos finais de cada unidade produtora é que devem definir qual produto é o mais vantajoso, considerando que os custos são variáveis, uma vez que a produção pode ser comprometida pela sazonalidade e pela oferta e procura dos alimentos, com repercussão na gestão de qualidade da unidade.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418/6790Copyright (c) 2023 Gabriel Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Camila Cremonezi JAPUR, Ana Paula Lara Michelin SANCHES, Cecília Helena Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Luzania dos Santos MARTINS, Cecília Vilela dos REIS, Marta Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania Vilela dos REIS, CecíliaNeves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta 2023-08-29T14:38:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/9418Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-08-29T14:38:45Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
Hortaliças in natura ou minimamente processadas em unidades de alimentação e nutrição: quais aspectos devem ser considerados na sua aquisição?
title Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
spellingShingle Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel
Food supply
Food services
Quality management
Greens
Abastecimento de alimentos
Alimentação coletiva
Gestão de qualidade
Hortal
title_short Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
title_full Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
title_fullStr Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
title_full_unstemmed Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
title_sort Fresh or minimally processed vegetables in foodservices: what aspects should be considered when purchasing them?
author Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel
author_facet Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel
Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila
Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara
Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena
dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania
Vilela dos REIS, Cecília
Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta
author_role author
author2 Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila
Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara
Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena
dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania
Vilela dos REIS, Cecília
Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho DEGIOVANNI, Gabriel
Cremonezi JAPUR, Camila
Michelin SANCHES, Ana Paula Lara
Peinado de Sampaio MATTOS, Cecília Helena
dos Santos MARTINS, Luzania
Vilela dos REIS, Cecília
Neves Campanelli Marçal VIEIRA, Marta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Food supply
Food services
Quality management
Greens
Abastecimento de alimentos
Alimentação coletiva
Gestão de qualidade
Hortal
topic Food supply
Food services
Quality management
Greens
Abastecimento de alimentos
Alimentação coletiva
Gestão de qualidade
Hortal
description ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to assess the losses that occur when fresh vegetables are processed, to compare the cost of purchasing fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using minimally processed food items. MethodsCorrection factors for seven food items were calculated by determining their gross and net weights in triplicate with a digital scale. Mean, standard deviation and variation coefficient were calculated. The costs of gross weight considering the correction for net yield were compared with the costs of minimally processed vegetables supplied by the manufacturer during two different periods. ResultsThe costs of minimally processed zucchini, carrot, chayote and arracacha were 8.6%, 14.1%, 4.6% and 13.5% lower than their respective fresh counterparts at time 1, a fact that did not repeat itself at time 2, when these vegetables were less expensive when bought fresh. ConclusionIn conclusion, numerous factors associated or not with the food directly influence the magnitude of the losses that occur during processing. The working methods and final objectives of each foodservice should define which product is more advantageoussince costs vary and production can be affected by seasonality and the supply and demand of the food item, with repercussions on the quality management of the foodservice. 
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/9418/6790
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; v. 23 n. 5 (2010): Revista de Nutrição
1678-9865
reponame:Revista de Nutrição
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Revista de Nutrição
collection Revista de Nutrição
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126073153159168