Invisible science: publication of negative research results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sayão, Luis Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Farias Sales, Luana, Marques Felipe, Carla Beatriz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Transinformação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836
Resumo: An important part of scientific research activities yield negative results – non-confirmatory and null data, inconclusive experiments, unexpected data. These results permeate the entire research cycle and constitute an important part of the full scientific knowledge flow generation. However, despite the acknowledgment that it is the non-confirmatory findings that result in the rejection of consolidated hypotheses that drive the progress of science, most of these investigation routes are not documented. Growing competition for resources, tenure, and impact publications induces researchers to produce “positive” results that are more likely to be published, interfering with the principles of science reproducibility and self-correction and in the scientific communication cycle. This study aims to review negative results incorporation in the traditional academic publication cycle. It also seeks to identify and systematize the main barriers that prevent researchers from publishing negative results. This exploratory study is based methodologically on the scarce literature on the subject. It confirms the initial assumption that few scientific journals accept, edit special issues or are dedicated to the publication of negative results.
id PUC_CAMP-4_0165f30e1c73a5e1a221c43c7f037476
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/5836
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-4
network_name_str Transinformação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Invisible science: publication of negative research resultsAn important part of scientific research activities yield negative results – non-confirmatory and null data, inconclusive experiments, unexpected data. These results permeate the entire research cycle and constitute an important part of the full scientific knowledge flow generation. However, despite the acknowledgment that it is the non-confirmatory findings that result in the rejection of consolidated hypotheses that drive the progress of science, most of these investigation routes are not documented. Growing competition for resources, tenure, and impact publications induces researchers to produce “positive” results that are more likely to be published, interfering with the principles of science reproducibility and self-correction and in the scientific communication cycle. This study aims to review negative results incorporation in the traditional academic publication cycle. It also seeks to identify and systematize the main barriers that prevent researchers from publishing negative results. This exploratory study is based methodologically on the scarce literature on the subject. It confirms the initial assumption that few scientific journals accept, edit special issues or are dedicated to the publication of negative results.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2021-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtículo revisado por paresAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836Transinformação; Vol. 33 (2021)Transinformação; Vol. 33 (2021)Transinformação; v. 33 (2021)2318-08890103-3786reponame:Transinformação (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836/3639Copyright (c) 2022 Transinformaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSayão, Luis Fernando Farias Sales, Luana Marques Felipe, Carla Beatriz2024-04-02T12:28:38Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/5836Revistahttp://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br2318-08890103-3786opendoar:2024-04-02T12:28:38Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Invisible science: publication of negative research results
title Invisible science: publication of negative research results
spellingShingle Invisible science: publication of negative research results
Sayão, Luis Fernando
title_short Invisible science: publication of negative research results
title_full Invisible science: publication of negative research results
title_fullStr Invisible science: publication of negative research results
title_full_unstemmed Invisible science: publication of negative research results
title_sort Invisible science: publication of negative research results
author Sayão, Luis Fernando
author_facet Sayão, Luis Fernando
Farias Sales, Luana
Marques Felipe, Carla Beatriz
author_role author
author2 Farias Sales, Luana
Marques Felipe, Carla Beatriz
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sayão, Luis Fernando
Farias Sales, Luana
Marques Felipe, Carla Beatriz
description An important part of scientific research activities yield negative results – non-confirmatory and null data, inconclusive experiments, unexpected data. These results permeate the entire research cycle and constitute an important part of the full scientific knowledge flow generation. However, despite the acknowledgment that it is the non-confirmatory findings that result in the rejection of consolidated hypotheses that drive the progress of science, most of these investigation routes are not documented. Growing competition for resources, tenure, and impact publications induces researchers to produce “positive” results that are more likely to be published, interfering with the principles of science reproducibility and self-correction and in the scientific communication cycle. This study aims to review negative results incorporation in the traditional academic publication cycle. It also seeks to identify and systematize the main barriers that prevent researchers from publishing negative results. This exploratory study is based methodologically on the scarce literature on the subject. It confirms the initial assumption that few scientific journals accept, edit special issues or are dedicated to the publication of negative results.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artículo revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5836/3639
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Transinformação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Transinformação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transinformação; Vol. 33 (2021)
Transinformação; Vol. 33 (2021)
Transinformação; v. 33 (2021)
2318-0889
0103-3786
reponame:Transinformação (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Transinformação (Online)
collection Transinformação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799125983921438720